The Construction of the Neoliberal Self in Belgrade Psychotherapeutic Practice

Bogdan Vukomanović

doi:10.21301/eap.v15i2.10

Bogdan Vukomanović Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v15i2.10

Keywords:

neoliberalism, psychotherapy, postsocialism, the self, self-improvement, Belgrade

Abstract

The processes of neoliberalization and European integration in Serbia have been underway for some time, and in addition to their effect on certain elements of the social structure such as the family, the economy, political life etc., their impact is also evident in the way that Serbian citizens perceive themselves and their position in this environment. Due to reduced social protection, the withdrawal of the state from the public sphere, and increasing financial and employment insecurity, individuals are obliged to assume responsibility for their lives and to engage in self-improvement with the aim of personal development and the finding of new survival strategies. Through interviews with psychotherapists and persons who have used the services of private psychotherapy, this paper looks at the relationship between private psychotherapeutic practice in Belgrade as a technique for self-improvement and the construction of the self in its clients, and then relates it to the broader socio-economic context in which the respondents live and work. The findings suggest that with regard to its clients, private psychotherapeutic practice mirrors the emphasis on independence, autonomy and responsibility for one's life and life decisions, which are typical features of the entrepreneurial self characteristic of the period of post-socialist neoliberalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bogdan Vukomanović, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade

PhD Candidate at Department of Ethnology and Anthropology

References

Aavik, K. 2017. „Doing Neoliberalism on Campus: The Vulnerability of Gender Equality Mechanisms in Estonian Academia“. Gender and Research 18 (1): 130-153. https://doi.org/10.13060/25706578.2017.18.1.353

Adams, G., Estrada-Villalta, S., Sullivan, D., & Markus, H. R. 2019. „The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology“. Journal of Social Issues 75(1): 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12305

Adams, M. 2003. „The reflexive self and culture: a critique“. British Journal of Sociology 54(2): 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000080212

Adler, J. M., & McAdams, D. P. 2007. „The narrative reconstruction of psychotherapy“. Narrative Inquiry 17(2): 179-202. https://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/docs/publications/106658335347b0761a32bec.pdf

Amable, B. 2011. „Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism“. Socio-Economic Review, No. 9, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq015

Antonijević, D. 2009. „Poraženi od sistema: struktura i značenje ličnih priča o gubitnicima hibridne tranzicije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 4(3): 47-65. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v4i3.3

Baćević, J. 2013. Antropologija, turizam i tranzicija: koncepcije o razvoju turizma u Knjaževcu. U Nova srpska antropologija 9: Antropologija turizma, uredili I. Kovačević i A. Banić-Grubišić, 127-138. http://www.anthroserbia.org/Publications/Details/54

Barker, K. 2002. „Self-Help Literature and the Making of an Illness Identity: The Case of Fibromyalgia“. Social Problems 49(3): 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00015.x

Binkley, S. 2011. „Psychological life as enterprise: social practice and the government of neo-liberal interiority“. History of the Human Sciences 24(3): 83-102.

Bloom, P. 2017. The Ethics of Neoliberalism: The Business of Making Capitalism Moral. New York: Routledge.

Cannizzo, F. 2018. „Tactical Evaluations: Everyday neoliberalism in academia“. Journal of Sociology 54(1): 77-91. doi:10.1177/1440783318759094

Chudakova, T. 2016. „Caring for Strangers: Aging, Traditional Medicine, and Collective Self-care in Post-socialist Russia“. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 31(1): 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12276

Collingsworth, J. 2014. „The Self-Help Book in the Therapeutic Ontosphere: A Postmodern Paradox“. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, No. 6, 755-771. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146755

Coyle, K., & Grodin, D. 1993. „Self‐help books and the construction of reading: Readers and reading in textual representation.“ Text and Performance Quarterly 13(1): 61-78. doi:10.1080/10462939309366032

Crawford, M. 2004. „Mars and Venus Collide: A Discursive Analysis of Marital Self-Help Psychology“. Feminism & Psychology 14(1): 63-79. doi:10.1177/0959-353504040305

Dwairy, M., & Van Sickle, T. D. 1996. „Western Psychotherapy in Traditional Arabic Societies“. Clinical Psychology Review 16(3): 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(96)00011-6

Effing, M. M. 2009. „The Origin and Development of Self-help Literature in the United States: The Concept of Success and Happiness, an Overview“. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 31(2): 125-141.

Erjavec, K., & Volčič, Z. 2009. „Management through spiritual self-help discourse in post-socialist Slovenia“. Discourse & Communication 3(2): 123-143.

Foster, R. 2016. „Therapeutic culture, authenticity and neo-liberalism“. History of Human Sciences 29(1): 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695115617384

Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the Self: A Seminar With Michel Foucault. Edited by M. H. Luther, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton. London: Tavistock Publications.

Gardner, L. B., & Scheffler, R. M. 1988. „Privatization in Health Care: Shifting the Risk“. Medical Care Review 45(2): 215-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/107755878804500203

Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hamann, T. H. 2009. „Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics“. Foucault Studies,No. 6, 37-59.

Hann, C., Humphrey, C., & Verdery, K. 2004. „Postsocialism as a topic of anthropological investigation“. Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia: 1-28.

Harvi, D. 2012. Kratka istorija neoliberalizma. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Hilgers, M. 2011. „The three anthropological approaches to neoliberalism“. International Social Science Journal 61(202): 351-364. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01776.x

Illouz, E. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Iwakabe, S. 2008. „Psychotherapy Integration in Japan.“ Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 18(1): 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.18.1.103

Jovanović, D. 2013. Identitet na prodaju – kreiranje nacionalnog identiteta za potrebe turizma. U Nova srpska antropologija 9: Antropologija turizma, uredili I. Kovačević i A. Banić-Grubišić, 113-126. http://www.anthroserbia.org/Publications/Details/54

Kelly, M. G. 2013. „Foucault, Subjectivity, and Technologies of the Self.“ In A Companion to Foucault, edited by C. Falzon, T. O'Leary, & J. Sawicki, 510-525.

Klein, E., & Mills, C. 2017. „Psy-expertise, therapeutic culture and the politics of the personal in development“. Third World Quarterly, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1319277

Kovačević, I. 2006. „Tranziciona legenda o dobitnicima“. Etnoantropološki problemi 1(2): 11-26. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v1i2.1

Lasch, C. 1979. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.

Lawn, J., & Pentice, C. 2015. „Neoliberal Culture / The Cultures of Neoliberalism“. SITES: New Series 12(1): 1-29. doi:10.11157/sites-vol12iss1id312

Lazzarato, M. 2009. „Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social“. Theory, Culture & Society 26(6) 109-133. doi:10.1177/0263276409350283

Madu, S. N. 2015. „Psychotherapeutic values for modern Africa“. World Journal «Psychotherapy» 8(1): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1509

Manga, P. 1987. „Privatization of Health Care Services in Canada: Reform or Regress?“ Journal of Consumer Policy, 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411942

Marks, S. 2018. „Suggestion, persuasion and work: Psychotherapies in communist Europe“. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling 20(1): 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2017.1421986

Marks, S., & Savelli, M. 2015. „Communist Europe and transnational psychiatry“. Psychiatry in communist Europe, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461516635532

Martin, M. W. 2000. „Moral Health: Responsibility in Therapeutic Culture“. The Journal of Value Inquiry, No.34, 27-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004760902713

Matza, T. 2009. „MOSCOW'S ECHO: Technologies of the Self, Publics, and Politics on the Russian Talk Show“. Cultural Anthropology 23(3): 489-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01038.x

Matza, T. 2012. „’Good individualism’? Psychology, ethics, and neoliberalism in postsocialist Russia“. American Ethnologist 39(4): 804-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01396.x

McGee, M. 2005. Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover Culture in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

McGuigan, J. 2014. „The Neoliberal Self“. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, No.6, 223-240. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146223

Mikuš, M. 2015. „The justice of neoliberalism: moral ideology and redistributive politics of public-sector retrenchment in Serbia“. Social Anthropology 24(2): 211-227.

Miller, P., & Rose, N. 2008. Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Miokov, V., & Vučinić-Nešković, V. 2011. Da li će Knjaz Miloš pripasti strancima? Privatizacija i slika multinacionalnih kompanija u srpskim medijima (2000-2005). Etnoantropološki problemi 6(1): 167-193. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i1.6

Mori, L. 2014. „A Momentary Lapse of Reason. Neoliberal Subjectivity and Recreational Drug Use“. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 6(3): 70-103.

Nwoye, A. 2010. „A Psycho-Cultural History of Psychotherapy in Africa“. Psychotherapy and Politics International 8(1): 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.207

Poon, A. 2015. „Helping the novel: Neoliberalism, self-help, and the narrating of the self in Mohsin Hamid's How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia.“ The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 52(1): 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989415583923

Rakow, K. 2013. „Therapeutic Culture and Religion in America“. Religion Compass 7(11): 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12074

Read, J. 2009. „A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity“. Foucault Studies, No. 6, 25-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2465

Reiff, P. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Reveley, J. 2016. „Neoliberal meditations: How mindfulness training medicalizes education and responsibilizes young people“. Policy Futures in Education, 1-15. doi:10.1177/1478210316637972

Rimke, H. M. 2000. „Governing Citizens Through Self-Help Literature“. Cultural Studies 14(1): 61-78.

Rose, N. 1999. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.

Salecl, R. 2012. Tiranija izbora. Zagreb: Fraktura.

Salmenniemi, S., & Adamson, M. 2015. „New Heroines of Labour: Domesticating Post-feminism and Neoliberal Capitalism in Russia.“ Sociology 49(1): 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513516830

Savelli, M. 2013. „The Peculiar Prosperity of Psychoanalysis in Socialist Yugoslavia“. The Slavonic and East European Review 91(2): 262-288. https://doi.org/10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.91.2.0262

Sima, Y., & Pugsley, P. C. 2010. „The Rise of a 'Me Culture' in Postsocialist China: Youth, Individualism and Identity Creation in the Blogosphere“. The International Communication Gazette 72(3): 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048509356952

Skultans, V. 1999. „Narratives of the body and history: Illness in judgement on the Soviet past“. Sociology of Health & Illness 21(3): 310-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00158

Sökefeld, M. 1999. „Debating Self, Identity, and Culture in Anthropology“. Current Anthropology 40(4): 417-448.

Tiaynen-Qadir, T., & Salmennieni, S. 2017. „Self-help as a glocalised therapeutic assemblage“. European Journal of Cultural Studies 20(4): 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417718205

Trifunović, V. 2009. „Konceptualizacija gubitnika i dobitnika tranzicije u popularnoj kulturi“. Etnoantropološki problemi 4(1): 107-121. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v4i1.5
Trifunović, V. 2011. „Postsocijalistička tr
ansformacija i novi oblici identifikacije u društvu Srbije“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 59(2): 149-159.
Vrasti, W., & Montsion, J. 2014. „No Good Deed Goes Unrewarded: The Values/Virtues of Transnational Volunteerism in Neoliberal Capital“. Global Society 28(3): 336-355.

Vukomanović, B. 2018. „Čitajući neoliberalizam: terapijski i spiritualni elementi literature za samopomoć u postsocijalističkoj Srbiji“. Glasnik Etnografskog muzeja 82: 33-52.

Vuković, D. 2017. Preoblikovanje neoliberalizma: socijalna politika u Srbiji. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Woodstock, L. 2005. „Vying Constructions of Reality: Religion, Science, and Positive Thinking in Self-Help Literature“. Journal of Media and Religion 4(3): 155-178.

Žikić, B. 2007. „Ljudi (koji nisu sasvim) kao mi. Kulturna konceptualizacija pojma privatnik u Srbiji“ U Antropologija postsocijalizma, uredio Vladimir Ribić, 52-74. Beograd. http://www.anthroserbia.org/Publications/Details/5

Žurić-Jakovina, I. 2014. „Samopomoć kao kulturalni fenomen: kontekstualni aspekti nastanka i razvoja knjiga za samopomoć i psihoterapijskog diskurza“. Holon 4(1): 5-34.