Crossroads and Barriers on the Roman Border: Institutional Authority, Roman Heritage and the “Đerdap” Projects

  • Tatjana B. Cvjetićanin National Museum, Belgrade
Keywords:
research projects Đerdap, Roman frontier, interpretation, Romanization, archaeological heritage, presentation, institutional authority

Abstract

Institutional authority, Roman heritage and the “Đerdap” projects Although “the archaeological research in the Đerdap area represents the most important crossroad in Serbian archaeology” (Bikić i Šarić 2017, 67), the role of the two large research projects Đerdap I and II in the development of the discipline and the local archaeological community remains to be thoroughly reconsidered. In search for the answer whether the vast corpus of archaeological material and information gained in the course of these projects influenced the shift in interpretation of the Roman past and in presentation of the Roman frontier on the Danube, the paper presents certain scientific and research aspects and the consequences of the projects for the interpretive framework of the Roman period. It may be expected that, just as the fieldwork itself was a large opportunity for professional training and growing, the huge amount of information on the Roman border collected during the projects became a constant source for further consideration and disciplinary growth. The innovations introduced – multi-disciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, preventive conservation and integral protection of heritage – foreshadowed the space for testing of ideas. However, the archaeological record of the Roman period, approached from the culture-historical point of view, dominant at the time, is still principally interpreted according to the concepts formed in 19th century and significantly reconsidered over the last couple of decades. The majority of the recovered material is not published yet, the limited access to the “finds in boxes” obliges current researchers to work on the base of available publications, and the confidence in “discoveries” induces the transfer of ideas of original researchers without further reconsideration. The abandonment of the concept of Romanization is slow, mainly due to the institutional “keepers”, as illustrated by chosen examples, e.g. the monograph Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier (Golubović, Mrđić 2018) and the exhibition Roman Limes and Cities in Serbia, organized on the occasion of the 24th International Limes-Congress, as well as the new permanent display of the National Museum, opened in 2018. It may be concluded that the constant affirmation of institutional authority, where the archaeological heritage of the Roman frontier acts as an academic symbolic capital, is more important than multivocal interpretation and presentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aronsson, Peter and Simon Knell (coordinators/editors). 2012. National Museums. Making Histories in a Di-verse Europe. Linköping: Linköping University University Electronic Press. EuNaMus Report no 7.
Babić, Staša. 2004. Poglavarstvo i polis – Starije gvozdeno doba centralnog Balkana i grčki svet. Beograd: Balkanološki institut SANU.
Babić, Staša. 2014. “Afterword – When Empires collapse”. In The Edges of the Roman World, edited by Marko A. Janković,Vladimir D. Mihajlović and Staša Babić, 252–256. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publis-hing.
Babić, Staša. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja u prošlosti. Beograd: Klio.
Bikić, Vesna i Josip Šarić (ur.). 2017. Mnemosynon Firmitatis. Sedamdeset godina arheološkog instituta (1947–2017). Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Borić Brešković, Bojana (ur.) 2018. Uđi u priču. Beograd: Narodni muzej, Iz riznice Narodnog muzeja 12.
Breeze, David J. and Sonja Jilek. (eds.) 2008. Frontiers of the Roman Empire. The European Dimensions of a World Heritage Site. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
Cermanović-Kuzmanović, Aleksandrina i Aleksandar Jovanović. 2004. Tekija. Beograd: Arheološki institut, Narodni muzej u Beogradu i Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Đerdapske sveske, Monografije 4.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2015a. „Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: doba artefakata“. Etnoantro-pološki problemi 10 (3): 557–593. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i3.2
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2015b. „Dunavski limes u Srbiji: uloga muzeja u interpretaciji i promociji Granica Rims-kog carstva“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XX-1: 363–383.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2016. Kasnorimska keramika Đerdapa, Beograd: Narodni muzej, Arheološke monografije 24.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2019a. „Prezentacija i reprezentacija. Prošlost u arheološkoj postavci Narodnog muzeja u Beogradu = Presentation and Representation. The Past in the Archaeological Display of the Natio-nal Museum in Belgrade“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XXIV-1: 389–412
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2019b. „Аrtefakti ili narativi – interpretacija rimske prošlosti“. Humboltov klub Srbije – Glasnik 19: 2–21.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2019c. „Teren i javna arheologija (ili Zašto je potrebno preispitivati i naizgled jasne ve-ze?)“. Etnoantropološki problemi 14 (3): 789–809. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i3.3
Ćosić, Natalija. 2016. „Autoritet i proizvodnja arheološkog znanja“. Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (3): 749–774. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i3.6
Ćosić, Natalija. 2018. „Otpakivanje neotpakovanog. Život i budućnost arheoloških zbirki“. Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (3): 595–615. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i3.2
Džonson, Metju. 2008. Arheološka teorija: uvod. Beograd: Clio.
Gardner, Andrew. 2019. „Imperijalizam i identiteti na granici rimskog sveta, Istraživačka stanica Petnica, 20–23. novembar 2018“. Etnoantropološki problemi 14 (3): 1044–1047.
Golubović, Snežana and Nemanja Mrđić. (eds.) 2018. Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology Monographies no. 68/1–2.
Gavrilović Vitas, Nadežda. 2018. “Roman Religion and Cults on the Danube Limes in Serbia”. In Vivere Mili-tare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier, edited by Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 169–196. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology Monographies no. 68/1.
Hingley, Richard. 1997. “Resistance and Domination: Social Change in Roman Britain”. In Dialogues in Ro-man Imperialism. Power, Discourse and Discrepant Experience in the Roman Empire, edited by David J. Mattingly, 81–100. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 23.
Hingley, Richard. 2005. Globalizing Roman Culture. Unity, Diversity and Empire. London: Routledge.
Ivanišević, Vujadin and Michael Kazanski. 2014. „Illyricum Nord et les Barbares à l’époques des Grand Migra-tions (Ve–VIe siècle)“. Starinar LXIV: 131–160.
Janković, Marko A. 2014. “Negotiating Identities at the Edge of the Roman Empire”. In Fingerprinting the Iron Age. Approaches to Identity in the European Iron Age. Integrating South-Eastern Europe into the De-bate, edited by Cătălin Nicolae Popa and Simon Stoddart, 89–96. Oxford & Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
Janković, Marko A., Vladimir D. Mihajlović and Staša Babić. (eds.) 2014. The Edges of the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Janković, Marko A. and Vladimir D. Mihajlović. 2018. Reflections of Roman Imperialisms. Cambridge: Cam-bridge Scholars Publishing
Jeremić, Gordana. 2009. Saldum. Roman and Early Byzantine Fortification. Belgrade: Institut Archéologique, Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 6.
Jeremić, Gordana, Dragana Antonović and Selena Vitezović. 2018. “Craftsmanship Along the Middle Danubi-an Limes”. In Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier, edited by Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 131–168. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology Mo-nographies no. 68/1.
Kondić (Rankov), Jelena. 2009. „Stanica Diana na dunavskim kataraktama. Station Cataractarum Diana – Po-lochrion Zanes. Projekat Diana/Zanes 1978/9–2008/9 (30 godina projekta Đerdap II)“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XIX-1: 367–402.
Kondić (Rankov), Jelena. 2013. „Moesian Late Roman Limes on the Danube“. In Constantin the Great and the Edict of Milan, 313. The Birth of Christianity in the Roman Provinces on the Soil of Serbia, edited by Ivana Popović, Bojana Borić-Brešković, 36–59. Belgrade: National Museum in Belgrade.
Kondić, Vladimir. 1984. „Les formes des fortifications protobyzantines dams la région des Portes de Fer“. In Villes et peuplement dans l’Illyricum protobyzantin, edited by G. Dragon, 131–161. Roma: École française de Rome, Collection de l’École française de Rome 77.
Korać, Miomir. 2018a. Kasnoantička i ranovizantijska utvrđenja Ljubičevac i Ušće Slatinske reke. Beograd: Arheološki institut, Đerdapske sveske. Monografije 8.
Korać, Miomir. 2018b, Preface to Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier, edi-ted by Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 7–8. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology Monographies no. 68/1.
Korać, Miomir, Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić. 2018. „Research of Viminacium and its Suburban Zones“. In Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier, edited by Snežana Go-lubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 41–72. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology Mono-graphies no. 68/2.
Korać, Miomir, Snežana Golubović, Nemanja Mrđić, Gordana Jeremić i Stefan Pop-Lazić. 2014. Roman Limes in Serbia / Rimski Limes u Srbiji (with introduction of Sonja Jilek and Davida Breeze). Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Korać, Miomir i Stefan Pop-Lazić (ur.) 2018. Rimski limes i gradovi na tlu Srbije = Roman Limes and Cities on the territory of Serbia. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Arheološki institut – Beograd, Ga-lerija Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti 145.
Kostić, Đorđe S. 2011. Dunavski limes Feliksa Kanica. Beograd – Viminacijum: Arheološki institut i Centar za nove tehnologije.
Kruljac, Vesna. 2009. Lazar Trifunović. Protagonist i antagonist jedne epohe. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Kuzmanović, Zorica. 2011. „Problem kulturnog identiteta u savremenoj arheološkoj praksi“. Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 595–606. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.3
Mattingly, David. (ed.) 1997. Dialogues in Roman imperialism. Power, discourse and discrepant experience in the Roman Empire. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology 23.
Mattingly, David. 2011. Imperialism, Power, and Identity. Experiencing the Roman Empire. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Mihailović, Srećko. 1985. Omladinske radne akcije. Rezultati socioloških istraživanja. Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar Saveza socijalističke omladine Srbije.
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2011. „Gordijev interpretativni čvor: rimski pisani izvori, ideja socio-kulturne evolu-cije i koncept romanizacije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 679–698. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.8
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2012. „Koncept romanizacije u arheologiji: uspon i pad paradigme“. Etnoantropološki problemi 7 (3): 709–729. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v7i3.5
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2019a. “Critique of Romanization in Classical Archaeology”. In Encyclopedia of Glo-bal Archaeology. Springer, Cham: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–51726–1_3115–1
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2019a. Skordisci između antičkih i modernih tumačenja. Pitanje identiteta u (pro-to)istoriji. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za istoriju, Centar za istorijska istraživanja, Monografije knjiga 2.
Mihajlović, Vladimir V. 2018. Na granicama Balkana. L. F. Marsilji i rimska baština. Beograd: Balkanološki institut SANU, Posebna izdanja 138.
Mirković, Miroslava. 1968. Rimski gradovi na Dunavu u Gornjoj Meziji, Beograd: Arhe­ološko društvo Jugo-slavije, Dissertationes Vol. 6.
Mirković, Miroslava. 2003. Römer an der mittleren Donau. Römische Strassen und Festungen von Singidunum bis Aquae. Beograd: Kompromis design Verlag Požarevac.
Mirković, Miroslava. 2007. Moesia Superior. Eine Provinz an der mittleren Donau. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag, Orbis Provinciarum. Römische Provinzen.
Olsen, Bjornar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheoloških istraživanja. Beograd: Geopo-litika.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beo-gradu.
Pearce, Susan M. 1990. Archaeological Curatorship. London and New York: Leicester University Press (Pa-perback edition 1996).
Petković, Sofija. 2018. “Fibulae and Roman Army on Danube in Moesia Superior”. In Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – living on the Frontier, edited by Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 65–130. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology Monographies no. 68/1.
Petrović, Petar and Miloje Vasić. 1996. “The Roman Frontier in Upper Moesia: Archaeological Investigations in the Iron Gate Area – Main Results”. In Roman Limes on the Middle and Lower Danube, edited by Petar Petrović, 15–26. Belgrade: Archaeological Institute Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 2, 1996,
Prodanović, Zora. 1982. Izložbena aktivnost Narodnog muzeja u Beogradu 1945–1980, Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Pruitt, Tera C. 2011. “Authority and the production of knowledge in archaeology”, Doctoral thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.15966
Senjković, Reana. 2017. Uvod u Omladinske radne akcije – dizajn ideologije, uredili Sanja Bachrach Krištofić i Mario Krištofić, 5–14. Zagreb: Umjetnička organizacija Kultura umjetnosti.
Srejović, Dragoslav. 1984. „Lepenski Vir, mezolitsko i neolitsko naselje“. Starinar XXXIII-XXXIV (1982–83): 195–196.
Srejović, Dragoslav. (ur.) 1993. Rimski carski gradovi i palate u Srbiji. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Galerija Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti 73.
Stare kulture 1969 = Stare kulture u Đerdapu. 1969. Beograd: Galerija Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti, katalog izložbe.
Starinar 1984 = Starinar XXXIII-XXXIV (1982–83)
Špehar, Perica. 2010. Materijalna kultura iz ranovizantijskih utvrđenja u Đerdapu. Beograd: Arheološki insti-tut, Narodni muzej, Cahiers des Portes de Fer, Monographies 7.
Trifunović, Lazar. 1969. „Borba sa vremenom“. Politika. Teleobjektiv: Đerdapska hronika, 13. 7. 1969. godi-ne: 30–32.
Trifunović, Lazar. 1984. „Đerdap 1961–1970“. Starinar XXXIII-XXXIV (1982–83): 1–4.
Vasić, Miloje i Vladimir Kondić. 1986. „Le limes romain et paléobyzantin des Portes de Fer“. In Studien zu den Militärgrenzen Roms III. 13 Internationaler Limeskongress Aalen 1983, 542–560. Stuttgart: Theiss, Vorträge, Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor– und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 20.
Vuković-Bogdanović, Sonja. 2018. “Meat Diet at the Upper Moesian Limes: Archaeozoological Evidences from the City of Viminacium and its Surroundings”. In Vivere Militare est. From Populus to Emperors – li-ving on the Frontier, edited by Snežana Golubović and Nemanja Mrđić, 269–310. Belgrade: Institute of Ar-chaeology, Institute of Archaeology Monographies no. 68/2.
Webster, Jane. 2001. “Creolizing the Roman provinces”. American Journal of Archaeology 105: 209–225.
Wilkes, John. 2005. “The Roman Danube: An Archaeological Survey”. Journal of Roman Studies 95: 124–225.
Woolf, Greg. 1997. “Beyond Romans and Natives”. World Archaeology 28/3: 339–350.
Published
2020-11-06