Those We Love to Hate: An Anthropological Analysis of "Succesion" as a Critique of Late-Stage Capitalism




Succession, family tv drama, late-stage capitalism, incomplete antihero


The paper tackles interpretations of late-stage capitalism and characters as incomplete antiheroes in the Succession tv-series (HBO 2018-). The characters in Succesion are the members of the wealthy American Roy family, in possesion of their own, family-run media conglomerate-empire, named Waystar RoyCo. Family businesses figure as symbols and pillars of success and are thought to preserve "good family values" in the official everyday and western political discourse. But Succession breaks down this myth and glorification of family-run businesses and treats it as a model of corrupted relationships that mirror themselves onto the smaller scales – specially onto family structure as a basic societal denominator. Following this premise is the second compontent – emotional reactions generated through morally ambiguous actions undertaken by every single character in the series. The lack of protagonist in the series and the portrayal of every character as an incomplete antihero leads us to the second important premise of the paper: the tropologization of characters, where every character embodies certain broader system flaw(s). Portrayed in this manner, characters are bearers of identity traits of late-stage capitalism hegemony. By exploiting their flaws, internal conflicts and morally ambiguous acts, the flaws of the system itself are revealed to the viewers. The dynamics of corrupted and broken relationships within the Roy family lead to perceiving it as an anti-family, which mirrors the insanity and downfall of the same system. The sardonic humor and brutalistic portrayal of the lack of ethics and morals generate strong emotional reactions among audiences that result in "liking the unlikeable". This controversial "loving to hate" is rooted in the cognitive and moral distance that builds up during the course of the series, which enables the viewers to take the standpoint of moral superiority.


Download data is not yet available.


Balkeran, Arianna. 2020. “Hustle Culture and the Implications for our Workforce”. Master thesis, Weissman School of Arts and Sciences, Baruch College, The city University of New York.

Bauman, Zygmunt. 2005. Work, Consumerism and the New Poor (Issues in Society). Open University Press: New York

Brunsdon, Charlotte. 2010. „Bingeing on Box-Sets: The National and the Digital in Television Crime Drama.“ In Relocating Television: Television in the Digital Context, edited by Jostein Gripsrud. Routledge: London: 61-75.

Bruun Vaage, Margrethe. 2016. The Antihero in American Television. Routledge: New York

Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, Elzbiseta. 2010. „Tropological space: the imaginary space of figuration“. Studia Linguistica 127: 25-37.

Drappa, Angelica. 2016. “The Visual Representation of the Anti-hero in Quality TV. Case Studies: Breaking Bad, Mad Men and Sons of Anarchy”. MA Thesis, Faculty of Arts, Radboud University

Garcia, N. Alberto (ed). 2016. Emotions in Contemporary TV Series. Palgrave MacMillan: New York.

Jenner, Mareike. 2015. “Binge-watching: Video-on-demand, quality TV and mainstreaming fandom”. International Journal of Cultural Studies 20 (3): 1-29.

Kovačević, Ivan. 2018. “O antropologiji TV serija”. Zbornik radova Fakulteta dramskih umetnosti 33: 97-112. DOI: 10.1177/1367877915606485

Lotz, Amanda D. 2014. The Television Will Be Revolutionized. New York University Press: New York and London.

Lyons, Siobhan. 2021. “The (Anti-)Hero with a Thousand Faces: Reconstructing Villainy in The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, and Better Call Saul”. Canadian Review of American Studies 51 (3): 225-246.

Marinez, Garcia Alejandro and Ana Marta Gonzales. 2016. „Emotional Culture and TV Narratives“. In Emotions in Contemporary TV Series, edited by Alberto N. Garcia,13-25. Palgrave MacMillan: New York:

Marrati, Paola and Martin Shuster. 2012. „Philosophy and New American TV Series“. MLN 127 (5): vii-ix DOI: 10.1353/mln.2012.0138

McGuigan, Jim. 2009. Cool Capitalism. Pluto Press: New York

Milanović, Nevena. 2021. „Binge drinking: pogled na ’pošast’ iz antropološke perspektive”. Antropologija (21) 3: 23-33.

Nannicelli, Ted. 2016. Appreciating the Art of Television. A Philosophical Perspective. Routledge: New York and London

Palaversich, Diana. 2016. „Junaci našeg doba: Lik narko-bosa u kolumbijskim telenovelama“. Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (2): 457-475.

Rodgers, G. 1989. „Precarious work in Western Europe: The state of the debate“. In Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: The growth of atypical employment in Western Europe, edited by G. Rodgers and J. Rodgers. International Institute for Labour Studies.

Rocchi, Marta. 2019. „History, Analysis and Anthropology of Medical Dramas: A Literature Review“. Cinergie II cinema e le altre arti 15. dostupno na:

Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsberry: London and New York

Starčević, Morana. 2014. „Prekarni rad i nemogućnost prekarne klase“. Diskrepancija 19: 37-57.

Thieme, Adeline Tatiana. 2017. “The Hustle Economy: Informality, uncertainty and the geographies of getting by”. Progress in Human Geography 42 (4): 1-20.

Wilkie, Dana. 2019. “Workplace Burnout Is Now an 'Occupational Phenomenon'.”




How to Cite

Milanović MInić, Nevena. 2022. “Those We Love to Hate: An Anthropological Analysis of ‘Succesion’ As a Critique of Late-Stage Capitalism”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 17 (2):561– 576.