Synthesising (Beyond) Ethnographies— Meta-ethnography Revisited
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v18i1.7Keywords:
meta-ethnography, metaphor, reciprocal translation, refutational synthesis, lines of argument, ethnographyAbstract
Meta-ethnography is an interpretive knowledge synthesis used for synthesizing data from ethnographic studies. It compares and analyses metaphors/data, creating a new interpretation or developing a new theory. Meta-ethnography was originally introduced by Noblit and Hare in 1988, and in the past thirty-five years, acquired popularity in different disciplines. But by today’s standards, the seminal text left stages of conducting meta-ethnography insufficiently described in terms of transparency and systematicity and being open to different interpretations. This paper aims to discuss and analyse seven phases of conducting meta-ethnography and to suggest how transparency and systematicity in each phase might be enhanced. The author acknowledges that meta-ethnography is still an evolving method and concludes that suggestions made in this paper may serve meta-ethnographers not as an anchor but as a compass in planning and executing each stage.Downloads
References
Atkins, Salla, Simon Lewin, Helen Smith, Mark Engel, Atle Fretheim, and Jimmy Volmink. 2008. “Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (April). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
Atkinson, Paul. 1990. The Ethnographic Imagination. London: Routledge.
Atkinson, Paul. 1992. Understanding Ethnographic Texts. London: Sage.
Avril Nicoll, “Meta-ethnography: interpretations of interpretations of George Noblit,” Speech and Language Therapy in Practice, June 28, 2016, https://speechmag.com/2016/06/28/meta-ethnography-interpretations-of-interpretations-of-george-noblit/
Barnett-Page, Elaine and James Thomas. 2009. “Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 9 (August). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
Booth, Andrew. 2016. “Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review.” Systematic Reviews 5 (May). https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
Britten, Nicky, Rona Campbell, Catherine Pope, Jenny Donovan, Myfanwy Morgan, Roisin Pill. 2002. “Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 7, no 4 (October): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432732
Cahill, Mairead, Katie Robinson, Judith Pettigrew, Rose Galvin, and Mandy Stanley. 2018. “Qualitative synthesis: A guide to conducting a meta-ethnography.” British Journal of Occupational Therapy 81, no. 3 (January): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022617745016
Campbell, Rona, Pandora Pound, Catherine Pope, Nicky Britten, Roisin Pill, Myfanwy Morgan, and Jenny Donovan. 2003. “Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.” Social Science & Medicine 56, no. 4 (February): 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3
Campbell, R, P Pound, M Morgan, G Daker-White, N Britten, R Pill, L Yardley, C Pope, and J Donovan 2011. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment NIHR HTA programme.
Carter, Daniel D., Katie Robinson, John Forbes, and Sara Hayes. 2018. “Experiences of mobile health in promoting physical activity: A qualitative systematic review and meta-ethnography.” PLoS ONE 13, no. 12 (December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208759
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme 2022. CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist, https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
Cunningham, Maggie, Emma F France, Nicola Ring, Isabelle Uny et al. 2019. “Developing a reporting guideline to improve meta-ethnography in health research: the eMERGe mixed-methods study.” Health Services and Delivery Research 7, no. 4 (February) https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07040
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Sheila Bonas, Andrew Booth, David R. Jones, Tina Miller, Alex J. Sutton, Rachel L. Shaw, Jonathan A. Smith, and Bridget Young. 2006a. “How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective.” Qualitative Research 6, no. 1 (February): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Debbie Cavers, Shona Agarwal, Ellen Annandale, Antony Arthur, Janet Harvey, Ron Hsu et al. 2006b. “Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 6, no. 35 (July). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Andrew Booth, and Alex J. Sutton. 2007. “Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports.” Qualitative Research 7, no. 3 (August). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078517
Doyle, Lynn H. 2003. “Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities.” Qualitative Research 3, no. 3 (December): 321-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033003
Eakin, Joan M. and Eric Mykhalovskiy. 2003. “Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9, no. 2 (May): 187-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x
Erasmus, Ermin. 2014. “The use of street-level bureaucracy theory in health policy analysis in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-ethnographic synthesis.” Health Policy Plan 3, no. iii (December): 70-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu112
Finfgeld-Connett, Deborah. 2014. “Metasynthesis Findings: Potential Versus Reality.” Qualitative Health Research 24, no. 11 (November): 1581-91. doi: 10.1177/1049732314548878
France, Emma F., Nicola Ring, Rebecca Thomas, Jane Noyes, Margaret Maxwell, and Ruth Jepson. 2014. “A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (November). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119
France, Emma F., Mary Wells, Heidi Lang, and Brian Williams. 2016. “Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis.” Systematic Reviews 5 (March). https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4
France, Emma F., Maggie Cunningham, Nicola Ring, Isabelle Uny, Edward A. S. Duncan, Ruth G. Jepson, Margaret Maxwell et al. 2019. “Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 19 (January). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
Garip, G. and L. Yardley. 2011. “A synthesis of qualitative research on overweight and obese people’s views and experiences of weight management.” Clinical Obesity 1, no. 2-3 (April): 110-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00021.x
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
Glenton C, M. A. Bohren, S. Downe, E. J. Paulsen, S. Lewin, on behalf of Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). 2020. EPOC Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Protocol and review template. Version 1.1. EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specific-resources-review-authors
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Glass, Gene V. 1976. “Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research.” Educational Researcher 5, no. 3 (November): 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
Hannes, Karin and Kirsten Macaitis. 2012. “A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers.” Qualitative Research 12, no. 4 (May): 402-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111432992
Hess Rice, Elisabeth. 2002. “The collaboration process in professional development schools results of a meta-ethnography, 1990-1998.” Journal of Teacher Education 53, no. 1 (January/February): 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001006
Kakos, Michalis and Bettina Fritzsche. 2017. “Meta-ethnography E&E.” Ethnography and Education 12, no. 2 (March): 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1278578
Lee, Richard Philip, Ruth Isla Hart, Rose Mary Watson, and Tim Rapley. 2015. “Qualitative synthesis in practice: some pragmatics of meta-ethnography.” Qualitaitve Research 15, no. 3 (February) 334-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114524221
Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage.
Malpass, Alice, Alison Shaw, Debbie Sharp, Fiona Walter, Gene Feder, Matthew Ridd, and David Kessler. 2008. “’Medication career’ or ‘moral career’? The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants.” Social Science and Medicine 68, no. 1 (January): 154-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.068
McCann, Sharon, Marion Campbell, and Vikki Entwistle. 2013. “Recruitment to clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 18, no. 4 (October): 233-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819613483126
Moher, David, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart, and PRISMA-P Group. 2015. “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.” Systematic Reviews 4 (January). https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Noblit, George W., and R. Dwight Hare. 1988. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Quantitative studies. London: Sage.
Noblit, George W. “Meta-Ethnography: Adaptation and Return.” In Cultural Constructions of Identity: Meta-Ethnography and Theory, edited by Luis Urrieta and George W. Noblit, 40-54. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190676087.001.0001
Noyes, Jane, Andrew Booth, Kate Flemming, Ruth Garside, Angela Harden, Simon Lewin, Tomas Pantoja, Karin Hannes, Margaret Cargo, and James Thomas. 2018. “Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020
Paré, Guy, Mary Tate, David Johnstone, and Spyros Kitsiou. 2016. “Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews.” European Journal of Information Systems 25, no. 6 (December). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0020-3
Pope Catherine, Nicholas Mays, and Jennie Popay. “Interpretive approaches to evidence synthesis.” In Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods, edited by Pope Catherine, Nicholas Mays, and Jennie Popay, 72-94. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007.
Pound, Pandora, Nicky Britten, Myfanwy Morgan, Lucy Yardley, Catherine Pope, Gavin Daker-White, and Rona Campbell. 2005. “Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking.” Social Science & Medicine 61, no. 1 (July) 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063
Pursell, Edward and Niall McCrae. 2020. How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review A Guide for Healthcare Researchers, Practitioners and Students. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49672-2
Rowe, Frantz. 2014. “What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations.” European Journal of Information Systems 23 (May): 241-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.7
Sandelowski, Margarete, and Julie Barroso. 2007. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Samnani, Sunil Sadruddin, Marcus Vaska, Salim Ahmed, and Tanvir C. Turin. 2017. “Review Typology: The Basic Types of Reviews for Synthesizing Evidence for the Purpose of Knowledge Translation.” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 17, no. 10 (October): 635-41. https://www.jcpsp.pk/archive/2017/Oct2017/10.pdf
Sattar, Raabia, Rebecca Lawton, Maria Panagioti, and Judith Johnson. 2021. “Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis.” BMC Health Services Research 21 (January). https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-06049-w
Schumm, Kate, Zoe Skea, Lorna McKee, and James N’Dow. 2010. “’They’re doing surgery on two people’: a metaethnography of the influences on couples’ treatment decision making for prostate cancer.” Health Expectations 13, no. 4 (December): 335-49. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1369-7625.2010.00624.x
Schütz, Alfred. 1962. “The Problem of Social Reality.” In Collected Papers I, edited by Maurice Natason. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Smith, Brett and Kerry R. McGannon. 2017. “Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology”. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11, no. 1 (May): 101-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357
Soundy, Andrew and Nicola R. Heneghan 2022. “Meta-ethnography.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 15, no. 1 (January): 266-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966822
Thorne, Sally. 2015. “Qualitative metasynthesis: a technical exercise or a source of new knowledge?” Psycho-Oncology 24 (August): 1347-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3944
Toye, Francine, Kate Seers, Nick Allcock, Michelle Briggs, Eloise Carr, and Karen Barker. 2014. “Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (June). https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
Tondeur, Jo, Johan van Braak, Guoyuan Sang, Joke Voogt, Petra Fisser, and Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2012. “Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence.” Computers & Education 59, no 1 (August): 134-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
Torgerson, Carole. 2003. Systematic Reviews. London and New York: Continuum.
Turner, Stephen R. 1980. Sociological Explanation as Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wurman, Richard Saul. 1989. Information Anxiety. New York: Doubleday.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
