“In Bitcoin We Trust": An Anthropological Approach to Bitcoin as Algorithmic Utopia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i1.3

Keywords:

Bitcoin, algorithm, blockchain, trust, tecnology, method

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contextualize briefly the emergence and development of Bitcoin as well as to offer an anthropological analysis of one such "algorithmic utopia" known as Bitcoin. Bitcoin was officially "born" in 2009. Its foundation was laid by the so-called white paper titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" (2008), authored by Satoshi Nakamoto, a pseudonym for an individual or a group of individuals. In essence, the intention of its creator (or creators) was to solve the technical problem of so-called double-spending of money, aiming to avoid reliance on a third party or institution (such as a bank) and the consequent loss of privacy for its users, with the help of an algorithm called blockchain. Although Bitcoin can be viewed in continuity with movements such as crypto-anarchism and cypherpunk, whose roots trace back to the 1980s of the twentieth century, and although it is not the first cryptocurrency nor the first alternative to fiat money, Bitcoin is indeed the first cryptocurrency to have attracted broader attention in both public and academic discourse. This paper will shed light on the context in which Bitcoin was born and popularized, and will endeavor to defend the assumption that the popular imagination behind the Bitcoin currency is technoutopian. Finally, this paper will seek to demonstrate that the algorithm at the very core of Bitcoin is perceived not only as the fulfillment of an Enlightenment dream of a method itself as a non-cultural and supra-historical guarantor of objectivity (as the one) removed from politics, economy and ideology but also as a democratization method applicable to them all. Apart from the mentioned above, the paper concludes that Bitcoin is seen as the fulfillment of a modernist dream of efficient, formal, predictable, depersonalized bureaucracies in the context of the diminished legitimacy of centralized, hierarchically structured, sluggish, fallible, and abuse-prone economic and state institutions. The focus of trust shifts to technology: to an algorithm seen as self-regulating, efficient, free from ideology, subjective interests, and potential abuse, almost divinely infallible, decentralized, and democratic system that provides a group of individuals not only with the necessary tools to achieve their freedom and privacy, deprived from control and regulations, but also as a tool for reforming the political and economic system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreianova, Marina, Sebastian Sonntag, Teemu Antikainen, Cecilia Alho & Jukka Blomberg. „Bitcoin Usage: Study on Bitcoin Usage Around the World 2020“. The Journal of FinTech 1(2):1-12.

Baldwin, Jon. 2018. „In digital we trust: Bitcoin discourse, digital currencies, and decentralized network fetishism“. Dostupno na: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-018-0065-0

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.

Bjerg, Ole. 2015. „How is Bitkoin Money?“. Theory, Culture and Society 0(0): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415619015

Brunton, Finn. 2019. Digital Cash: The Unknown History of Anrachists, Utopians, And Technologists Who Built Cryptocurrency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Corsín Jiménez, Alberto. 2011. „Trust in Anthropology“. Anthropological Theory 11(2): 177-196.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611407392

D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.

Dickel, Sascha & Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2016. „The Logic of Digital Utopianism“. Nanoethics(11): 47-58. https://doi.org/0.1007/s11569-017-0285-6

Dodd, Nigel. 2014. The Social Life of Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dodd, Nigel. 2017. „Bitcoin as Politics“. In Money in a Human Economy, edited by Keith Hart, 189-209. New York: Berghahn.

Dodd, Nigel. 2018. „The Social Life of Bitcoin“. Theory, Culture and Society 35(3): 35-56.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417746464

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2020. The enforced cooling down of an overheated world. Social Anthropology 28(2): 285-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12847

Eyal, Gil & Thomas Medverz. 2023. „Introduction“. In The Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics edited by Gil Eyal and Thomas Medvetz, 1-29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faustino, Sandra, Ines Faria & Rafael Marques. 2021. „The myths and legends of king Satoshi and the knights of blockchain“. Journal of Cultural Economy 15(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1921830

Foer, Albert Allen. 2018. „Culture, Economics, and Antitrust: The Example of Trust“. The Antitrust Bulletin 63(1): 65-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X18756144

Foley, Sean, Bart Frijns, Alexandre Garel, Tai-Yong Roh. “Who buys Bitcoin? The cultural determinants of Bitcoin activity.” International Review of Financial Analysis. 84:1-15

Forounghi, Hamid, Yannis Gabriel & Marianna Fotaki. 2019. „Leadership in a post-truth era: A new narrative disorder?“ Leadership 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019835369

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. The Concequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gluck, Mary. 1993. „Review: Modernity and Self-Identity“. History and Theory 32(2): 214-220.

Golumbia, David. 2016. The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.

Graeber, David. 2008. „Hope in Common“. Dostupno na: http://web.archive.org/web/20090210032906/http://slash.autonomedia.org/node/11569

Harsin, Jayson. 2020. „Toxic White masculinity, post-truth politics and the COVID-19 infodemic“. European Journal of Cultural Srudies: 23(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420944934

Hart, Keith. 2008. „Anthropology in the Financial Crisis“. Anthropology Today 24(6): 1-3.

Hart 2012. „The roots of the global economics crisis“. Anthropology Today 28(2): 1-3

Hart, Keith. 2015. „Money from a cultural point of view“. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5(2): 411-416.

Ingham, Geoffrey. 2004. The Nature of Money. Cambridge: Polity.

Karlstrøm , Henrik. 2014. „Do libertarians dream of electrical coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin“. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2013.870083

Kulenović, Nina. 2011. Socijalna ontologija u filmu Avatar: Antropološka analiza. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet – Univerzitet u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju.

Kulenović, Nina. 2017. Objašnjenje u antropologiji: polemike. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet – Univerzitet u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju.

Kulenović, Nina. 2021. Koncept kulture između individualizma i holizma: pogled iz prosvetiteljsko-kontraprosvetiteljskog spora. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet – Univerzitet u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju.

Kulenovic, Nina. 2022. „Ogled o dobu postistine: prolegomena za razumevanje pandemije kovid-19“. U: Kovid-19 u Srbiji ’20, uredio Bojan Žikić, 109-127. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.

Maurer, Bill. 2006. „The Anthropology of Money“. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 15-36.

Maurer, Bill, Taylor C. Nelms & Lana Swartz. 2013. „When perhaps the real problem is money itself! : the practical materiality of Bitcoin“. Social Semiotics 23(2): 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.777594

Maurer, Bill. 2021. „Blockchain“. In Digital Anthropology edited by Heather A. Horst & Daniel Miller, 197-218. London: Berg.

Möllering, Guido. 2006. „Trust, institutions, agency: towards a neoinstitutional theory of trust“. In Handbook of Trust Research, edited by Reinhard Bachmann and Akbar Zaheer, 355-376. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Nakamoto, Satoshi. 2008. „Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System“. Dostupno na: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

O’Hara, Kieron. 2004. Trust. Cambridge: Icon Books.

Radonjić, Ognjen. 2010. „Ontologija novca Zimel, Knap i Kejnz“. Theoria 53(1): 45-66.

Roth, Felix. 2009. „The Effect of the Financial Crisis on Systemic Trust“. Dostupno na: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-86024-0

Salazar, Noel B. (2020). „Anthropology and anthropologists in the times of crisis“. Social Anthropology 28(2), 346-347.

Swartz, Lana. 2018. „What was Bitcoiin, what it will be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology“. Cultural Studies 32(4) : https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.141642

Vidan, Gili & Vili Lehdonvirta. 2018. „Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness“. New Media & Society 21(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818786220

Warren, Mark. 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wälti, Sébastien. 2012. „Trust no more? The impact of the crisis on citizens’ trust in central banks. Journal of International Money and Finance 31: 593-605.

Weingart, Peter. 2023. „Trust and Distrust of Scientific Experts and the Challanges of the Democratization of Science“. In The Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics edited by Gil Eyal and Thomas Medvetz, 29-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

White, Lawrence H. 2023. Better Money: Gold, Fiat, or Bitcoin? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-10

How to Cite

Kulenović, Nina. 2024. ““In Bitcoin We Trust": An Anthropological Approach to Bitcoin As Algorithmic Utopia”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 19 (1):65–85. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i1.3.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>