Constructing a Scientific Explanation in Anthropology on the Principles of Methodological Individualism


  • Suzana Ignjatović Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Bošković Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade and Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia



Methodological individualism, methodological holism, scientific explanation, cognitivism, agency


The paper deals with methodological individualism in sociocultural anthropology. Key theories and debates within the framework of methodological individualism in anthropology are presented in the paper. The authors discuss criticisms aimed at the use of methodological individualism in anthropology as not suitable for anthropology, due to its specificity. Instead, they argue that methodological individualism has advantages for a better understanding of many anthropological topics, especially compared to methodological holism. The authors’ assumption is that anthropology is not exclusively a holistic science, as the history of anthropological theory points to an important tradition of methodological individualism. The focus is placed on alternative models of scientific explanation, found in the works of contemporary anthropologists (Holy, Stuchlik), as well as methodological individualists from other disciplines (Boudon), whose conclusions are applicable to anthropology. Methodological individualism does have a significant place in anthropology. There are areas of anthropology that can draw heuristic benefit from epistemological approaches based on the principles of methodological individualism.


Download data is not yet available.


Barth, Fredrik. 1959. Segmentary Opposition and the Theory of Games: A Study of Pathan Organization. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 89 (1): 5-21.

Barth, Fredrik. 1966. Models of Social Organisation. Occasional Paper 23. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.

Barth, Fredrik. 2007. Overview: Sixty Years in Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 1-16.

Bell, Duran. 1995. On the Nature of Sharing: Beyond the Range of Methodological Individualism. Current Anthropology 36 (5): 826-830.

Boettke, Peter. 1998. Rational Choice and Human Agency in Economics and Sociology: Exploring the Weber-Austrian Connection. In: Merits and Limits of Markets, ed. H. Giersch. Berlin: Springer.

Bošković, Aleksandar. 2008. Napomena priređivača. U: Kliford Gerc, ur. Aleksandar Bošković, Kultura 118/119.

Bošković, Aleksandar. 2010. Kratak uvod u antropologiju. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.

Bošković, Aleksandar. 2015. Ozbiljne igre: Teorija u antropologiji posle 1980-ih. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (1): 19-41.

Bošković, Aleksandar i Suzana Ignjatović. 2012. Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice. Ethnos 77 (2): 289-294.

Boudon, Raymond. 1998. Etudes sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: PUF.

Boudon, Raymond. 2001. Sociology that Really Matte., Inaugural Lecture. European Academy of Sociology, Swedish Cultural Center.

Boudon, Raymond. 2003a. Raison, bonnes, raisons. Paris: PUF.

Boudon, Raymond. 2003b. La conversion de Coleman à la théorie du choix rationnel: impressions et conjectures. Revue française de sociologie 44 (2): 389-398.

Boudon, Raymond. 2004. [2002] Théorie du choix rationnel ou individualisme méthodologique? Revue du MAUSS, 2 (24): 281-309.

Boudon, Raymond. 2009 [1977]. Effets pervers et ordre social. Paris: PUF.

Boudon, Raymond. 2011. Ordinary rationality: the core of analytical sociology. In: P. Demeulenaere (eds.) Analytical sociology and social mechanisms.Cambridge University Press.

Boudon, Raymond and François Bourricaud. 2003. A Critical Dictionary of Sociology. London: Routledge.

Bubandt, Nils, and Ton Otto. 2010. Anthropology and the predicaments of holism. In: (eds.), Experiments in Holism, eds. T. Otto and N. Bubandt. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bush, Paul D. 2008. Culture, values and institutions. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Davidson, Donald. 1963. Actions, Reasons, and Causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685-700.

Davis, John B. 2008. The conception of the socially embedded individual. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Dirkem, Emile. 1963. [1895] Pravila sociološke metode. Beograd: Savremena škola.

Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on individualism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Durkheim, E. (1968) [1912] Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: PUF. URL:

Đurić, Mihailo. 1964. Sociologija Maksa Vebera. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

Edling, Christofer and Peter Hedström. 2005. Analytical Sociology in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 15 (4): 511.

Elster, Jon. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Paris: Edition de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland and Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of anthropology. London: Pluto Press.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Hawkes, Kristen, et al. 1993. Hunter-gatherers: Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods. Current Anthropology 34 (4): 341-361.

Hedström, Peter and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. In: Peter Hedström, Richard Swedberg (ed.) Social Mechanisms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2007. Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2): 211-26.

Holy Ladislav. 1976. Kin Groups: Structural Analysis and the Study of Behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 107-131.

Holy, Ladislav and Milan Stuchlik. 1983. Actions, Norms and Representations: Foundations of an anthropological inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ignjatović, Suzana. 2012. Komparacija primene teorije racionalnog izbora u sociologiji i antropologiji. U: Pomeraćemo granice, ur. Mirjana Rasević i Milan Marković. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Ignjatović, Suzana. 2015. „Eshatološka“ rasprava o budućnosti antropologije. Koncept krize antropologije u zborniku The End of Anthropology. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (1): 43-54.

Ignjatović, Suzana. 2016. Nasleđe Rejmona Budona. Sociologija 58 (1): 32-52.

Keyes, Charles. 2002. Weber and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 233-255.

Kincaid, Harold. 2014. Dead Ends and Live Issues in the Individualism-Holism Debate. In: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, eds. Julie Zahle, Finn Collin. Berlin: Springer.

Kulenović, Nina. 2014. Metodološki individualizam nasuprot metodološkom holizmu. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (2): 309-333.

Little, Daniel. 2014. Actor-Centered Sociology and the New Pragmatism. In: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, eds. Julie Zahle, Finn Collin. Berlin: Springer.

Lukes, Steven. (1968) Methodological Individualism Reconsidered. The British Journal of Sociology 19 (2): 119-129.

Mayhew, Anne. 2008. Institutions, culture and values. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis, Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar.

Nettle, Daniel. 1997. On the Status of Methodological Individualism. Current Anthropology 38(2): 283-286.

Ortner, Sherry. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126-166.

Parker, Wayne D. 2006. “Methodological individualism vs. methodological holism: neoclassicism, institutionalism and socionomic theory”. Paper presented at the joint annual congress of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP) and the Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), Paris, France, July 5-8, 2006.

Peacock, James. 2004. The Anthropological Lens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Poper, Karl. 1993. Otvoreno društvo i njegovi neprijatelji. Tom II, Beograd: BIGZ.

Rapport, Nigel. 1997. Transcendent Individual. London and New York: Routledge.

Rapport, Nigel, and Joanna Overing. 2000. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.

Samuels Warren. 1972. The Scope of Economics Historically Considered. Land. Economics 48 (3): 248-268.

Steel, Daniel. 2006. Methodological Individualism, Explanation, and Invariance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4): 440-463.

Stuchlik, Milan. 2014 [1977]. Goals and Behaviour. Historická sociologie 2/2014: 9-42.

Udehn, Lars, 2001. Methodological Individualism. London: Routledge.

Udehn, Lars. 2002. The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 479-507.

Udehn, Lars. 2003. The methodology of rational choice. In: The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, eds. Stephen Turner, Paul Roth. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Vargas, Eduardo Viana et al. 2008. The debate between Tarde and Durkheim. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2006: 761-777.

Veber, M. (1976) Privreda i društvo (tom 1). Beograd: Prosveta.

Watkins, J. W. N. 1955. Methodological Individualism: A Reply. Philosophy of Science 22 (1): 58-62.

Watkins, J. W. N. 1957. Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (30): 104-117.

Watkins, J. W. N. 1958. The Alleged Inadequacy of Methodological Individualism. The Journal of Philosophy 55 (9): 390-395.

Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2009. Comments on Rational Choice and the Humanities. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities 1(1).




How to Cite

Ignjatović, Suzana, and Aleksandar Bošković. 2018. “Constructing a Scientific Explanation in Anthropology on the Principles of Methodological Individualism”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 13 (1):17-40.