The Serbian family in the late Middle ages

  • Siniša Mišić Department of History Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade
Keywords:
family, nuclear family, cooperative family, marriage, children, dowry, Serbia, middle ages

Abstract

Marriage in Serbia in the middle ages was conducted only between persons belonging to the same social class. It was arranged and the woman would bring a dowry which would be controlled by the husband as long as the marriage lasted. Male children would inherit their father. Daughters played a significant role in connecting families through marriage. A man, unlike a woman would not bear any consequences in case of adultery. The consequence of this was a large number of extramarital children. In the Serbian state in the middle ages the family, or the “home” (kuća as it is named in sources), was the basic unit of society. The family could be nuclear or cooperative. Through the analysis of diplomatic data, as well as the first Turkish books – defters, one can see that one quarter of the population lived in nuclear families. More than half of the families which lived in cooperative arrangements were made up of small cooperatives numbering no more than two or three members. Almost all cooperative families were made up of father-son or brotherly cooperatives. The type of cooperative was largely influenced by the length of life or the capability of giving birth. The source material shows a small number of large cooperatives. Nuclear families and cooperative families are present in both the nobility and the small folk (dependents). There is no difference in the family structure with regard to social status. Nuclear families are omnipresent, and the characteristics of cooperative families are the same in nobility, serfs, sokalniks (a class a little above the serfs, who were most often servants, with certain privileges), priests, repairmen or fishermen. The difference is seen only within the Vlach population where in the cooperative there are more sons in law than in other populations. This is the result of an attempt of an agrarian population to move toward the status of herdsmen which was more favorable for them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blagojević, M. 1970. Kada je kralј Dušan potvrdio dečansku hrisovulјu? IČ 16 – 17.
Blehova – Čelebić, L. 2002. Žene srednjovjekovnog Kotora. Podgorica.
Bobić, M. 1998. Srpska srednjovekovna porodica u oblasti Brankovića. Sociologija 3: 393 – 410.
Bobić, M.1996. Proučavanje porodice i domaćinstava na osnovu popisa oblasti Brankovića iz 1455. godine. Stanovništvo 34 (1–2): 29 – 38.
Bobić, M. 2001. „Kuće, porodice i zadruge“. U Naselјa i stanovništvo oblasti Brankovića 1455. godine, ur. M. Macura, 316 – 372. Beograd.
Bogišić, V. 1927. Pravni članci i rasprave 1. Beograd.
Gabarahmanov, P. Š. 1996. Srednevekovыe krestьяne i ih semьi. Moskva.
Mišić, S. 2010. Zakonske odredbe o vlasima u povelјama Nemanjića. Braničevski glasnik 7: 36 – 48.
Mišić, S. 2005. Naselјenost Polimlјa u srednjem veku. Mileševski zapisi 6: 63 – 78.
Mišić, S. 1996. Humska zemlјa u srednjem veku. Beograd.
Novaković, St. 1965. Selo. Beograd.
Rašević, M. 2001. „Demografske prilike i stnovništvo“. U Naselјa i stanovništvo oblasti Brankovića 1455. godine, ur. M. Macura. Beograd.
Taranovski, T. 1996. Istorija srpskog prava u Nemanjićkoj državi. Beograd.
Fostikov, A. 2004. „Žena – između vrline i greha“. U Privatni život u srpskim zemlјama srednjeg veka, S. Marjanović-Dušanić i D. Petrović (prir.), 323 – 366. Beograd.
Published
2015-07-10
How to Cite
Mišić, Siniša. 2015. “The Serbian Family in the Late Middle Ages”. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 10 (2), 357-81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i2.4.