Evolution of students’ friendship networks: Examining the influence of group size


  • Valentina Sokolova Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Tomašević Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Bojana Dinić Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Isidora Jarić Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia




social networks, students’ friendship network, network evolution, group size


The main aim of this study was to examine the effect of the network size on formation and evolution of students’ friendship relations. Data was collected from two groups of sociology freshmen: a group from the University of Belgrade, which represents a larger group, and a group from the University of Novi Sad, which represents a smaller group. The data was collected in three periods of one academic year. We analyzed the structural features of students’ networks and constructed a stochastic model of network evolution in order to explore how friendships form and change during one year. The results showed that structural features of the larger and the smaller group differ in each stage of friendship formation. At the beginning of group forming, small world structure was noticeable in the larger group, although full small world structure was not confirmed in both groups. Furthermore, transitivity of triads had effect on the evolution of the larger network, while balance or structural equivalence had effect on the evolution of the smaller network. Results of the structural analysis are in line with findings of the network evolution model and together they provide an insight into how friendship evolves in groups of different sizes.


Download data is not yet available.


Allan, G. 1988. Friendship, sociology and social structure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship 15(5): 661-670.

Blieszner, R. M., and G. R. Adams. 1992. Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Brewer, D. D. and C. M. Webster. 2000. Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks. Social Networks 21(4): 361-373. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00018-0.

David-Barrett, T. A. Rotkirch, J. Carney, I. B. Izquierdo, J. A. Krems, D. Townley, E. McDaniell, A. Byrne-Smith, and R. I. M. Dunbar. 2015. Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: Cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PloS One 10(3): e0118329. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118329.

Davis, J. A. 1963. Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations. American Journal of Sociology 68: 444–462. doi:10.1086/223401.

DeLay, D. B. Laursen, N. Kiuru, K. Salmela-Aro, and J. E. Nurmi. 2013. Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence 23: 464-473. doi:10.1111/jora.12017.

Demeulenaere, P. Ed. 2011. Analytical sociology and social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921315.

Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469.

Granovetter, M. S. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201-233. doi:10.2307/202051.

Hallinan, M. T. 1978/79. The process of friendship formation. Social Networks 1: 193-210. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90019-9.

Hedström, P. 2009. The analytical turn in Sociology. In The Frontiers of Sociology, eds. Hedström P. and B. Wittrock, 331-342. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004165694.i-450.105.

Johnson, A. M. 1989. Variables associated with friendship in an adult population. Journal of Social Psychology 129(3): 379-390. doi:10.1080/00224545.1989.9712054.

McCarty, C. 2002. Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure 3(1). Retreived from https://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html

Mercken, L., T. A. B. Snijders, C. Steglich, E. Vartiainen, and H. de Vries. 2010. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks 32: 72-81. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.

Milgram, S. 1967. The small world problem. Psychology Today 1: 61-67.

Mizruchi, M. S. 1993. Cohesion, equivalence, and similarity of behavior: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Social Networks 15: 275–307. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(93)90009-A.

Newcomb, T. M. 1961. The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. doi:10.1037/13156-000

Newman, M. E., D. J. Watts, and S. H. Strogatz. 2002. Random graph models of social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 2566-2572. doi:10.1073/pnas.012582999.

Ripley, R. M., T. A. B. Snijders, Z. Boda, A. Voros, and P. Preciado. 2014. Manual for RSiena Version 4.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College.

Roberts, S. G., R. I. Dunbar, T. V. Pollet, and T. Kuppens. 2009. Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks 31(2): 138-146. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002.

Roberts, S. G., and R. I. Dunbar. 2011. Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Personal Relationships 18(3): 439-452. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01310.x.

Runger, G., and S. Wasserman. 1979/80. Longitudinal analysis of friendship networks. Social Networks 2: 143-154. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(79)90003-0.

Steglich, C., T. A. Snijders, and M. Pearson. 2010. Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological methodology 40(1): 329-393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x.

Travers, J., and S. Milgram. 1969. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4): 425-443. doi:10.2307/2786545.

Ueno, K. and R. G. Adams. 2006. Adult friendship: A decade review. In Close relationships eds. Noller P. and J. A. Feeney, 151-170. New York: Psychology Press.

Van de Bunt, G. G., M. A. Van Duijn, and T. A. Snijders. 1999. Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5(2): 167-192. doi:10.1023/A:1009683123448.

Van Duijn, M. A., E. P. Zeggelink, M. Huisman, F. N. Stokman, and F. W. Wasseur. 2003. Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27(2-3): 153-191. doi:10.1080/00222500305889.

Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815478.

Watts, J. D., and S. H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393(6): 440-442. doi:10.1038/30918.

Watts, J. D. 1999. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 105(2): 493-527. doi:10.1086/210318.

Weiss, S. R. 1988. A taxonomy of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15(5): 671-683. doi:10.1177/0265407598155006.




How to Cite

Sokolova, Valentina, Aleksandar Tomašević, Bojana Dinić, and Isidora Jarić. 2016. “Evolution of students’ Friendship Networks: Examining the Influence of Group Size”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 11 (4):1135-51. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i4.10.



Other Humanities and Social Sciences