Chaos and Order: Contemporary Cosmology and Myth


  • Milan Tomašević The Institute of Ethnography SASA, Belgrade, Serbia



cosmology, cosmogony, myth, popular cosmology, anthropology


The paper offers a definition of cosmology and its connections with mythology, and presents contemporary theories as a secular mythical narrative suitable for anthropological analysis. The paper is dedicated to emphasizing the folklore characteristics of modern cosmology and points to the importance of popular cosmological narratives as reading that contains culturally, philosophically and even religiously relevant elements. Special attention is paid to cosmogonic myths that describe the state of the universe before the creation of space and time. A parallel has been drawn between modern cosmology and conventional cosmogonic myths. In the end, the paper offers a concise definition of popular cosmology and recalls the most important authors and popularizers of modern theories.

The main task of the paper is to present the basic concepts that can contribute to a complete understanding of the anthropological character of the presentation of contemporary cosmology that we encounter in popular narratives. The aim of such an analysis is to observe the depth of the significance of modern science for creating a philosophical picture of the world that inherits secular worldviews. By treating popular cosmology as a modern myth, the paper presents a new dimension of the significance of scientific theories for today's civilization. Such an approach unravels the strictly positivist halo of cosmology and points to its anthropological character.

The concepts highlighted in the paper serve as an illustration of the significance that the image of the universe and the position of the Earth has for the history of civilization. By presenting the cultural dimension of cosmology, it opens a space for dialogue between different branches of scientific research, i.e. it contributes to the communication of philosophy and science. Equally important, by illuminating the folklore character of the narrative of the origin and history of the universe, a training ground is created for philosophers and theologians who, in their own ways, interpret the creation of everything around us.

By drawing attention to authors such as Neil deGrasse Tyson, Lawrence Kraus, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku and others, as contemporary bards and narrators, the paper seeks to contribute to the understanding of popular cosmology as an expression of modern man's need for great stories, for narratives that transcend the spatial and temporal frames of one generation, and that is exactly what myths do.


Download data is not yet available.


Barrow, John D. 1991. „The Evolution of the Universe“. New Literary History 22 (4): 835–856.

Campion, Nicholas. 2012. Astrology and Cosmology in the World’s Religions. New York and London: New York University Press.

Danesi, Marcel. 2002. Understanding Media Semiotics. London: Arnold.

Davies, Paul. 1988. The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature`s Creative Ability to Order the Universe. Philadelphia and London: Templeton Foundation Press.

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London and New York. Routledge.

Douglas Mary. 2006. Natural Symbols – Explorations in Cosmology. London and New York: Routledge.

Dundes, Alan. 1997. „Binary Opposition in Myth: The Propp/Levi-Strauss Debate in Retrospect.“ Western Folklore 56 (1): 39–50.

Eagleton, Terry. 1997. Iluzije postmodernizma. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Eliade, Mircea. 1970. Mit i zbilja. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.

Fengren, Gary B. 2000. The History of Science and Religion on the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing INC.

Gleiser, Marcelo. 2005. The Dancing Universe: From Creation Myths to the Big Bang. Hanover – New Hampshire: Dartmouth College Press.

Guth, A. H. and S. P. Bhavsar. 1982. Phase Transitions in the Embryo Universe [and Discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 307 (1497): 141–148.

Kearney, M. 1975. „World View Theory and Study“. Annual Review of Anthropology (4): 247–270.

Knobe, Joshua. Ken D. Olum and Alexander Vilenkin, 2006. Philosophical Implications of Inflationary Cosmology. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1): 47–67.

Kragh, Helge. S. 2007. Conceptions of Cosmos – From Myths to the Accelerating Universe: A History of Cosmology. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.

Leeming. David A. 2010. Creation Myths of the World: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.

Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1989. Strukturalna antropologija. Zagreb: Stvarnost.

Lič, Edmund. 2002. Kultura i komunikacija: Logika povezivanja simbola – Uvod u primenu strukturalističke analize u socijalnoj antropologiji. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.

Malinovski, Bronislav. 1971. Magija, nauka i religija i druge studije. Beograd: Prosveta.

Meletinski, E. M. 1982. Poetika mita. Beograd: Nolit.

Ridpat, Jan. 2007. Veliki rečnik astronomije. Beograd: Dereta.

Ruggles, Clive. 2005. Ancient Astronomy: An Encyclopedia of Cosmologies and Myth. Santa Barbara/Denver/Oxford: ABC Clio.

The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. 2010. Ed. Alan Barnard and Jonathan Spencer. Oxon. New York: Routledge.

Turner. Victor W. 1969. The Ritual Process – Structure and Anti-Structure, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Weinberg, Steven. 2008. Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Čapo, Erik. 2008. Teorija mitologije. Beograd: Clio.




How to Cite

Tomašević, Milan. 2020. “Chaos and Order: Contemporary Cosmology and Myth”. Etnoantropološki Problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 15 (4):1101–1118.