Vinča Burials in the Research of Miloje M. Vasić
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v15i3.2Keywords:
history of ideas, archaeological documentation, excavations, graves, Vinča, Middle Ages, archival materialAbstract
Miloje M. Vasić (1869–1956) is considered to be the founding father of Serbian archaeology. This paper directly challenges, as based on detailed archival research, the prevailing view that his excavation of the Vinča archaeological site is a model standard for Serbian archaeology. Instead, Vasić’s handling of the excavation was selective, non-systematic and destructive when viewed today from the perspective of modern practices.
Vasić originally gained authority based on the discovery of Vinča, a prehistoric archaeological site that contains layers from the Neolithic to the middle ages. In his zeal to uncover “prehistory”, he deliberately ignored the other archaeological layers present. The most significant example of neglected archaeological remains is his excavations of Vinča’s medieval cemetery where he did not document observations systematically. This prioritization of the importance of one archaeological period over another was reflected in the further development of archaeology in Serbia, so that medieval archaeology was treated as marginal and second-rate compared to others.
The aim of this paper, therefore, is to contextualize Vasić’s approach through the methods used in the history of archaeology. The key research question thereof is how Miloje M. Vasić failed to document the burials at the Vinča site, which is the consequent reason why there is little to no documented evidence of them.
The theoretical and methodological basis of the analysis is based on the approach of Gavin Lucas who views the creation of the primary field documentation as testimony. Lucas notes that the debate concerning knowledge production had drifted from merely an epistemological issue to a phenomenon centered around archaeological practice. Here the key questions have come to concern the social and material setting of knowledge production and not the objective coherence of the argument.
Burials that were noted in Vasić’s documentation are categorized into four groups: 1) unwanted or medieval burials; 2) incidental burials originating from prehistory 3) an “ossuary” from Vinča containing nine skeletons and 4) imagined multiple cremations based on one found cremation. Therefore, even while documenting several “lateral” prehistoric graves, he entirely omitted any thorough documentation of the medieval cemetery, considering them of less import.
If there is any lesson that may be learned from this journey through the history of archaeological practice, it is that archaeological documentation as a form of testimony should be done ethically, adequately and responsibly. It should not be done according to the practices of the “bad science” of its founding-fathers.
Downloads
References
Babić, Staša. 2011. „Čemu još istorija arheologije?“ Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 565–577. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.1
Bandović, Aleksandar i Jovan Mitrović. 2015. „Od muzejskog poslužitelja do kustosa: 90 godina od smrti Ante Mudrovčić“. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (3): 769–773.
Bandović, Aleksandar. 2012. „Gustaf Kosina i koncept kulture u arheologiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi 7 (3): 629–648. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v7i3.2
Borić, Dušan. 2016. “A view of Vinča from Cambridge: Minns’ reviews of the 1930s publications by Vasić”. Istraživanja 27: 7–32. https://doi.org/10.19090/i.2016.27.7–32
Bradley, Richard. 2015. “Repeating the unrepeatable experiment”. In Material Evidence. Learning from archaeological practice, edited by Robert Chapman & Alison Wylie, 23–41. London: Routledge.
Chapman, Robert and Alison Wylie. 2016. Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury.
Ćorović-Ljubinković, Mirjana. 1983. „Srednjovekovna arheologija u Srbiji između dva svetska rata“. U Spomenica Srpskog arheološkog društva 1883–1983, uredio Nikola Tasić, 27‒40. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.
Garašanin, Milutin. 1973. Praistorija na tlu SR Srbije. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
Jovanović, Borislav. 1963. „Les groupes de civilisation de l’âge métaux à Vinča“. Archaeologia Iugoslavica IV: 19–24.
Jovanović, Borislav. 1984. „Stratigrafija“. U Vinča u praistoriji i srednjem veku, uredio Stojan Ćelić, 23–34. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Jevtić, Miloš, Miodrag Sladić i Miroslav Lazić. 2006. Židovarsko blago. Ostava srebrnog nakita iz naselja Skordiska. Vršac: Gradski muzej Vršac.
Kaninia, Eriphyle and Stine Schierup. 2017. “Vroulia Revisited. From K.F. Kinchs excavations in the early 20th century to the present archaeological site”. In Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens vol. VIII, edited by Kristina Winther, Jacobsen Rune Frederiksen and Søren Handberg, 89–129. Athens: Danish Institute at Athens.
Kinch, Karl Frederik. 1914. Fouilles de Vroulia (Rhodes). Berlin: Goerg Reimer, librairie-éditeur et imprimeur.
Kovačević, Jovan. 1949. „Slovenske i srpske starine u Vinči kraj Beograda i manastir Vinča“. Muzeji 3–4: 114‒128.
Lucas, Gavin. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, Gavin. 2019. Writing the Past. Knowledge and Literary Production in Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Marjanović-Vujović, Gordana. 1981. „Gde je bio manastir Vinča u Vinči“. Starinar XXXI/1980: 193–202.
Marjanović-Vujović, Gordana. 1983. „Razvoj nacionalne arheologije“. U Spomenica Srpskog arheološkog društva 1883–1983, uredio Nikola Tasić, 83‒89. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.
Marjanović-Vujović, Gordana. 1984. „Srednjovekovna Vinča“. U Vinča u praistoriji i srednjem veku, uredio Stojan Ćelić, 87–106. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Marjanović-Vujović, Gordana. 1986. „Prilog proučavanju istorijata istraživanja srednjovekovnih nekropola u Srbiji“. Starinar XXXVI/1985: 105–114.
Milosavljević, Monika. 2015. „Koncept drugosti varvarstva i varvarizacije u srpskoj arheologiji“. Doktorska dis. Filozofski fakultet: Univerzitet u Beogradu.
Milosavljević, Monika i Aleksandar Palavestra. 2016. „Vasićev zakon periferije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 11(3): 775–808. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i3.7
Nikolić, Dubravka. 2006. “On the Issue of Fortifications at Vinča”. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 22: 9–22.
Nikolić, Dubravka i Jasna Vuković. 2008. „Od prvih nalaza do metropole kasnog neolita, otkriće Vinče i prva istraživanja“. U Vinča, praistorijska metropola, uredila Dubravka Nikolić, 39–86. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Novaković, Predrag. 2015. Historija arheologije u novim zemljama Jugoistočne Evrope. Sarajevo: Univerzitet u Sarajevu.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. „U službi kontinuiteta. Etno-arheologija u Srbiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi 6 (3): 579–606. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.2
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2012. „Vasić pre Vinče (1900–1908)“. Etnoantropološki problemi 7 (3): 649–679. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v7i3.3
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2013. „Čitanja Miloja M. Vasića u srpskoj arheologiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi 8 (3): 681‒715. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v8i3.4
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2020. Usamljeni arheolog. Terenski metod Miloja M. Vasića. Beograd (u štampi).
Palavestra, Aleksandar i Monika Milosavlević. 2016. „Hiperboreja u srpkoj arheologiji“. Arhaika 4: 118–140.
Pruitt, Tera. 2011. “Authority and the Production of Knowledge in Archaeology”. PhD diss. University of Cambridge.
Srejović, Dragoslav. 1984. „Miloje M. Vasić, tvorac srpske arheološke nauke“. Starinar n. s. XXXV: 25–32.
Stefanović, Sofija, Jelena Jovanović, Maja Miljević, Saša Živanović. 2016. „Starčevačka grupna grobnica na Vinči ili mesto neolitskog zločina?“ U XXXIX godišnji skup Srpskog arheološkog društva, Vršac, 2–4. 6. 2016. Program, izveštaji i apstrakti, priredili Adam Crnobrnja i Vojislav Filipović, 88. Beograd: Srpsko arheološko društvo.
Tasić, Nikola. 1984. „Naselje vatinske kulture“. U Vinča u praistoriji i srednjem veku, uredio Stojan Ćelić, 76-–83. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Tasić, Nenad, Miroslav Marić, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Bernard Kromer, Alistair Barclay, Alex Bayliss, Nancy Beavan, Bisserka Gaydarska, Alasdair Whittle. 2015. “Vinča Belo Brdo Serbia: The times of a tell”. Germania 93: 1–75.
Todorović, Jovan. 1971. Katalog praistorijskih predmeta. Beograd: Muzej grada Beograda.
Vasić, M. Miloje. 1906. „Starosrpska nalazišta u Srbiji“. Starinar n.r. 1: 39–88.
Vasić, M. Miloje. 1909. „Narodni muzej u 1908. god. A. Istorijsko-umetnički odeljak“. Godišnjak Srpske kraljevske akademije XXII: 147–179.
Vasić, M. Miloje. 1928. Žiča i Lazarica. Studije iz srpske umetnosti srednjeg veka. Beograd: Izdavačka knjižarnica Gece Kona.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1932. Preistoriska Vinča I. Industrija cinabarita i kosmetika u Vinči. Beograd: Državna štamparija Kraljevine Jugoslavije.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1936a. Preistoriska Vinča II. Oblici grobova. Mistične oči. Igra na tabli. Datovanje Vinče. Beograd: Državna štamparija Kraljevine Jugoslavije.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1936b. Preistoriska Vinča IV. Keramika. Beograd: Državna štamparija Kraljevine Jugoslavije.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1938a. „Dunavska Dolina i Italija u gvozdenom dobu“. Starinar XIII: 3–40.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1938b. „Starosrpski grobovi oko crkve manastira Vinče“. Prilozi za književnost, jezik, istoriju i folklor XVIII: 366–374.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1948. „Jonska kolonija Vinča“. Zbornik Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu I: 85–224.
Vasić, Miloje M. 1950. „Kroz kulturni sloj Vinče I, II“. Spomenik Srpske akademije nauka Odeljenje društvenih nauka, nova serija 100/2 (1): 1–87.
Vassits, Miloje M. 1910. „Die Hauptergebnisse der praehistorischen Ausgrabung in Vinča im Jahre 1908“. Praehistorische Zeitshrift II: 23–39.
Arhivska građa
Foto-dokumentacija i planovi sa arheoloških iskopavanja Vinče pod rukovodstvom Miloja M. Vasića, Arheološka zbirka Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, Fond Miloje M. Vasić
„Skicen blok 1“, Arheološka zbirka Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, Fond Miloje M. Vasić
„Skicen blok 2“, Arheološka zbirka Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, Fond Miloje M. Vasić
Žurnal, 1911 – terenski dnevnik sa arheoloških iskopavanja Vinče u rukopisu, Narodni muzej u Beogradu
Žurnal, 1912 – terenski dnevnik sa arheoloških iskopavanja Vinče u rukopisu, Narodni muzej u Beogradu
Žurnal, 1931 – terenski dnevnik sa arheoloških iskopavanja Vinče u rukopisu, Narodni muzej u Beogradu
Žurnal, 1933 – terenski dnevnik sa arheoloških iskopavanja Vinče u rukopisu, Narodni muzej u Beogradu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Aleksandar Palavestra, Monika Milosavljević
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.