Biography of a Painted Vessel from Starčevo: Discovering Layers of Meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v15i3.6Keywords:
painted pottery, Starčevo culture, Starčevo-Grad, biography of things, archaeological practice, relations between people and thingsAbstract
Scientific interest in the painted pottery of the Starčevo culture in Serbia dates back to the very beginnings of research and the first works on the relative-chronological systematization of the Early and Middle Neolithic of the central Balkans. This paper presents the deconstruction of our established notion of painted ceramics as the ultimate parameter of relative-chronological dating, the most representative material reflection of the cultural identity of the people of Starčevo culture and the highest achievements of Starčevo culture. The paper discusses circumstances and archaeological practices through which this ingrained view and knowledge of painted pottery was formed. The research is based on the analysis of the biography of a painted vessel from the Starčevo-Grad site, having in mind that a detailed life history of an object can shed light on wider phenomena in the archaeological discipline. The aim of this paper is to remind that objects do not have a single essential meaning, but that their meaning shifts and builds through changes in the historical and social context, as well as through changes of actors gathered around certain practices in which the objects are used. The biography of the painted vessel is therefore viewed as a series of assemblages of relations in two planes, through which its identity and layers of meaning were built. The first plane is the Neolithic, in which the focus is on the practices of painting and use, and the second is her life in the role of an archaeological artifact, during which she moves from the sphere of scientific research and musealization to the sphere of negotiating contemporary cultural identities. By applying a new analytical approach, we discovered that this vessel was not very skilfully and carefully painted, and that as such it does not testify to the highest achievements of Starčevo culture, but to a social practice, learning, apprentices and mastering the skill of pottery painting. Therefore, I believe that by reducing painted pottery to relative-chronological parameters and luxury objects, we lose sight of the possibilities through which we can build much more diverse interpretations of the past.
Downloads
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and Politics of Value”. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by Аrjun Appadurai, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582
Aranđelović-Garašanin, Draga. 1954. Starčevačka kultura. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.
Bajčev, Olga. 2018. “Painted Pottery and Culinary Practices: Use-alteration Analysis of Painted Pottery from the site of Starčevo-Grad”. In Social Dimensions of Food in the Prehistoric Balkans, edited by Maria Ivanova, Bogdan Athanassov, Vanya Petrova, Desislava Takorova, and Philipp W. Stockhammer, 86–108. Oxford: Oxbow Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dsx3
Bajčev, Olga. 2019. „Slikana grnčarija ranog i srednjeg neolita centralnog Balkana: između stila i prakse“ Doktorska dis. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.
Bandović, Aleksandar. 2019. „Miodrag Grbić i nastanak kulturno-istorijske arheologije u Srbiji“ Doktorska dis. Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu.
Benac, Alojz. (ur.) 1979. Praistorija jugoslovenskih zemalja II. Neolitsko doba, Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine i Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja.
Bogdanović, Milenko. 1998. „Prilog proučavanju neolitizacije kontinentalnog dela Balkanskog poluostrva“. U Rad Dragoslava Srejovića na istraživanju praistorije centralnog Balkana, uredio Nikola Tasić, 61–70. Kragujevac: Centar za naučna istraživanja Srpske akademije nauka i umetnosti i Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
Castro Gessner, Ana G. 2008. “The Technology of Learning: Painting Practices of Early Mesopotamian Communities of the 6th Millennium, B. C.” PhD Thesis, Graduate School of Binghamton University, State University of New York.
Castro Gessner, Ana G. 2010. “The Practice of Decorating Late Neolithic Pottery in Northern Mesopotamia”. In Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East, edited by Sharon R. Steadman and Jennifer C. Ross, 99–116. London and Oakville: Equinox Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315539256
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2014. „Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: utemeljenje muzejske arheologije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 575–596. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i3.2
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2015. „Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: doba artefakata“. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (3): 557–593. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i3.2
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2019. „Prezentacija i reprezentacija: Prošlost u arheološkoj postavci narodnog muzeja u Beogradu“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XXIV (1): 385–422.
Ćosić, Natalija. 2015. „Biografija nalaza ‘ritualne grupe’ sa Medvednjaka“. Arhaika 3: 15–41.
Dimitrijević, Stojan. 1974. „Problem stupnjevanja starčevačke kulture s posebnim osvrtom na doprinos južnopanonskih nalazišta rešavanju ovih problema“. Materijali X: 59–123.
Fewkes, Vladimir J., Hetty Goldman, and Robert. W. Ehrich, 1933. “Excavations at Starčevo, Yugoslavia, Seasons 1931 and 1932: а Preliminary Report”. Bulletin of American School of Prehistoric Research 9: 33–54.
Gačić, Divna. 2005. Miodrag Grbić (1901–1969): Život i delo. Novi Sad: Muzej grada Novog Sada.
Garašanin, Milutin.1973. Praistorija Srbije. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
Gosden, Chris and Yvonne Marshall. 1999. “The Cultural Biography of Objects”. World Archaeology 31 (2): 169–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/125055
Grbić, Мiodrag. 1930a. “Bemalte Keramik aus Starčevo im Banater Danaugelände – Jugoslavien”. Księga pamiątkowa ku uczczeniu siedemdziesiątej rocznicy urodzin Prof. Dr. Włodzimierza Demetrykiewicza, pod redakcja J. Kostrzewskiego, 111–112. Poznan.
Grbić, Мiodrag. 1930b. „Keramika bakarnog doba iz nalazišta kod Čoke u Banatu“. Glasnik istorijskog društva u Novom Sadu III (2): 198–206.
Hodder, Ian.2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118241912
Joy, Jody. 2009. “Reinvigorating Object Biography: Reproducing the Drama of Object Lives“. World Archaeology 41 (4): 540–556. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40388274
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process”. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in cultural perspective, edited by Ajrun Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lucas, Gavin. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. London and New York: Routledge.
Milojčić, Vladimir. 1949. Chronologie der jüngeren Steinzeit Mittel– und Südosteuropas. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.
Narodni muzej Beograd: Vodič. 1979. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Trifunović, Lazar. (ur.) 1968. Neolit centralnog Balkana. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Stalio, Blaženka. 1977. Neolit na tlu Srbije. 1977. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Nikolić, Dubravka. 2001. „Rani neolit u Srbiji – kulturno hronološki odnosi“. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 17: 9–20.
Nikolić, Dubravka. 2005. “The Development of Pottery in the Middle Neolithic and Chronological Systems of the Starčevo Culture”. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 21: 45–70.
Ninković, Veselinka. 2009. „Arheološko odeljenje Muzeja kneza Pavla“. U Muzej kneza Pavla, uredila Tatjana Cvjetićanin, 124–141. Beograd: Narodni muzej.
Schanks, Michael. 1998. “The life of an Artifact in an Interpretive Archaeology”. Fennoscandia archaeological 15: 15–30.
Shanks, Michael. 2005. Art and the Early Greek State. An Interpretive Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1975. “Behavioral Chain Analysis. Activities, Organization, and the Use of Space”. Fieldiana. Anthropology 65, Chapters in the Prehistory of Eastern Arizona IV: 103–119. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29782476?seq=1
Schiffer, Michael B. 1976. Behavioral Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
Skibo, James M. 1992. Pottery Function: A Use-Alteration Perpective. New York: Plenum Press.
Skibo, James M. 2013. Understanding Pottery Function. New York: Springer.
Skibo, James M. and Michael B. Schiffer. 2008. People and Things: A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. New York: Springer.
Tasić, Nenad N. 1997. „Hronologija starčevačke kulture“. Doktorska dis. Filozofski fakultet Univerzitet Beogradu.
Tasić, Nenad N. 2009. Neolitska kvadratura kruga. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Tripković, Ana i Boban Tripković. 2018. „Neolitsko nalazište i javnost: primer Donje Branjevine kod Odžaka“. Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (3): 651–675. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i3.5
Van Keuren, Scott and Grace E. Cameron. 2015. “The Lives of Painted Bowls at Ancestral Pueblos in East-Central Arizona”. American Antiquity 80 (1): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002–7316.79.4.25
Vitezović, Selena i Ivan Vranić. 2017. „Studije tehnologije i studije materijalne kulture: mogućnosti bliže saradnje na primeru koštanih artefakata“. Etnoantropološki problemi 12 (3): 703–724. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v12i3.2
Vuković, Jasna. 2011. “Early Neolithic Pottery from Blagotin, Central Serbia: A Use-Alteration Analysis”. In Beginnings – New Research in the Appearance of the Neolithic between Northwest Anatolia and the Carpathian Basin. Papers of the International Workshop 8th-9th April 2009, Istambul, edited by Raiko Krauß, 205–211. Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH.
Vuković, Jasna. 2017. Studije keramike, Teorija i metodologija u analizama grnčarije u arheologiji. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Whittle, Alasdair, Laszlo Bartosiewicz, Dušan Borić, Paul Pettitt, and Michael Richards. 2002. “In the Beginning: New Radiocarbon Dates for the Early Neolithic in Northern Serbia and South-East Hungary”. Antaeus 25: 63–117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Olga Bajčev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.