The Phenomenon of University Americanization: A Critical Review by Max Weber

Authors

  • Isidora Jarić Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosphy, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nataša Jovanović Ajzenhamer Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosphy, University of Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.4

Keywords:

Max Weber, higher education, bureaucracy, democracy, the process of Americanization

Abstract

The paper discusses the phenomenon of Americanization of European universities in a historical perspective, referring to the critical comparison of higher education in Germany and the United States, conceived by Max Weber after the experience of his stay at American universities in 1904. In accordance with the subject and goal, the paper is divided into several thematic units that include the historical context of European university development, defining the research question, the historical and theoretical context (his trip to the International Congress of Arts and Sciences in St. Louis and defining two of Weber's key theoretical concepts (rationalization and bureaucratization) which are necessary for understanding his analysis of higher education), consideration of Weber's most important  work on this topic (Wissenschaft als Beruf), and presentation of the conclusions of our analysis. The paper provides an overview of Weber's comparison of two university models: (a) the American model, which he sees as market-oriented, democratized and meritocratic, and (b) the German model, which he sees as critical, holistic and humanistic. Despite the prevailing opinion in modern Weberology that Weber was an apologist of the way in which American higher education works, in this paper we try to show that Weber in his deliberations offered a far more balanced view of the situation at universities in the two countries (United States and Germany), and that he managed to show different aspects, i.e. the advantages and disadvantages of these two, in many respects different, models of higher education and academic communities derived from them. Although the paper deals with a part of Max Weber's legacy and in that sense with a discussion that is part of the history of sociological ideas, the basic ideas that Weber argues in it have not lost their relevance in contemporary discussions on higher education reform in Europe.

References

Aron, Raymond. 1998. Predgovor. U Veber M. Duhovni rad kao poziv, 5-54. Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka kuća Zorana Stojanovića,

Arthur, Lore and Brenda Little. 2010. The REFLEX study: exploring graduates’ views on the relationship between higher education and employment. http://oro.open.ac.uk/21279/1/Higher_Education_and_Society._Chapter_2_-_The_REFLEX_study.pdf

Ash, Mitchell G. 2006. “Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-Speaking Europe and the USA”. European Journal of Education. 41(2): 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x

Bendix, Reinhard. 1966. Max Weber: An Intelectuall Portrait. London and New York: Routledge.

Carlsson, Bo, Zoltan Acs, David Audretsch and Pontus Braunerhjelm. 2009. “Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship and economic growth: A historical review”. Industrial and Corporate Change. 18(6): 1193-1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043

Eliaeson, Sven. 2000. “Constitutional Caesarism: Weber’s politics in their German context”. In The Cambridge Companion to Weber, edited by S. Turner, 131-148. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Elster, Jon. 2000. “Rationality, economy, and society”. In The Cambridge Companion to Weber, edited by S. Turner, 21-41. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Forfar, David. 1996. “What became of the Senior Wranglers?” Mathematical Spectrum. 29 (1). https://clerkmaxwellfoundation.org/WranglersWhatBecame2008_1_24.pdf

Gerth, Hans and Wright Mills. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Halsey, A.H. 1961. “University Expansion and the Collegiate Ideal”. Higer Education Quarterly 16 (1): 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1961.tb00696.x

Herbst Mikolaj, Agnieszka Olechincka and Asam Ploszaj. 2011. “Higher education institutions: Potential barriers, costs, opportunities”. U The resource-integrating state: Development potential vs. the quality of public regulations, edited by Mazur Stanislaw, 107-137. The Malopolska School of Public Administration: Cracow University of Economics. https://www.academia.edu/2351749/Higher_Education_Institutions_Potential_Barriers_Costs_Opportunities

Ilić, Vladimir. 2017. “Veberova metodološka rešenja na planu proučavanja spasenja”. Pregled LVIII (1): 69-90.

Jarić, Isidora i Nataša Jovanović Ajzenhamer. 2020. “The Forgotten Controversy: Evidence for a World of Alternative Values”. Limes Plus 2, 9-31. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4621699

Jeremić Molnar, Dragana i Aleksandar Molnar. 2013. “Lutalački etos i duh romantike. Razmatranja na tragu sociologije Maksa Vebera”. Sociološki pregled XLVII (3): 355-372. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0085-6320/2013/0085-63201303355J.pdf

Jovanović Ajzenhamer, Nataša. 2019. Veberovo shvatanje značaja ratničkog ethosa za nastanak i razvoj islama (doktorska disertacija).

Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History”. The American Journal of Sociology 85 (5): 1145-1179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778894?origin=JSTOR-pdf

Liessmann, Konrad Paul. 2008. Teorija neobrazovanosti: Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb; Jasenski i Turk.

Loader, Colin and Jeffrey C. Alexander. 1985. “Max Weber on Churches and Sects in North America: An Alternative Path toward Rationalization”. Sociological Theory 3(1): 1-6. doi: 10.2307/202165

Mazón, Patricia. 2003. Gender and the Modern Research University: The Admission of Women to German Higher Education, 1865–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Molnar, Aleksandar. 2014. “Predgovor”. U M. Veber, Država: racionalna ustanova države i moderne političke partije i parlamenti: sociologija države, 9-30. Novi Sad: Meditterran Pubslishing.

Offe, Claus. 2005. Reflections on America. Tocqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Owen, David and Tracy B. Strong. 2004. “Introduction”. In M. Weber, The Vocation Lectures, x-xvii. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

Radkau, Joachim. 2009. Max Weber: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Reckling, Falk. 2001. “Interpreted Modernity. Weber and Taylor on Values and Modernity”. European Journal of Social Theory 4 (2): 153-176.

Rogers, Howard Jason. 2011. International Congress of Arts and Science, Volume I Philosophy and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge Edition.

Roth, Guerlther. 1976. “History and sociology in the work of Max Weber”. British Journal of Sociology 27(3): 306-318. https://doi.org/10.2307/589618

Sam, Chanphirun and Peter van der Sijde. 2014. “Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models”. Higher Education 68 (6): 891-908. doi:10.1007/sl0734-014-9750-0

Schluchter, Wolfgang. 2006. Grundlegungen der Soziologie. Eine Theoriegeschichte in systematischer Absicht. Morh Sledbbek. Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck.

Veber, Maks. 1998. Duhovni rad kao poziv. Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka kuća Zorana Stojanovića.

Veber, Maks. 2006. Politički spisi. Beograd: “Filip Višnjić” i Službeni glasnik.

Veber, Maks. 2011. Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Veber, Maks. 2014. Država: racionalna ustanova države i moderne političke partije i parlamenti. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Weber, Max. 1975. Max Weber: A Biography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Weber, Max. 1989. Metodologija društvenih nauka. Zagreb: Globus.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Jarić, Isidora, and Nataša Jovanović Ajzenhamer. 2021. “The Phenomenon of University Americanization: A Critical Review by Max Weber”. Etnoantropološki Problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 16 (4):1083–1100. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.4.