The Story of Dorćol: The “Jevremova – Street of Meetings” Manifestation and the Multicultural Construction of Place of Memory




Dorćol, place of memory, multicultural past, “branding” of the urban center


The paper considers the manifestation “Jevremova Street – Street of Meetings” as a new custom instated by the Belgrade municipality of Stari Grad (Old Town), as a means to promote the spirit of neighborly relations and tolerance, as well as evoke the collective memory of the multiethnic and multiconfessional makeup of the inhabitants of the oldest part of the city – Dorćol. The obvious intent to keep up with the global trend of multicultural policies initiated not only this manifestation, but also a specific kind of “branding” of Dorćol through a series of different activities and publications dedicated to emphasizing the cultural specificity of this part of the city which is characterized by a unique topography, the great age of the city center, and a multicultural past. The attempts made by administrative governments and cultural organizations to promote Dorćol and revitalize its significance as a “place of memory” and an attractive tourist, cultural, educational and commercial location, a multiethnic location rife with urban spirit was motivated, in this author’s opinion, by political reasons and was supposed to serve as a means to demonstrate the extent of the democratic and civil changes in Serbia after the year 2000. The data presented here was gathered through the ethnographic method of participant observation. The main characteristics of the “Jevremova – Street of Meetings” celebration have been described, and its function within the context of historical, ethnic and confessional specificities of Dorćol have been analyzed. The paper also includes an analysis of the urban semiotics of the neighborhood.


Download data is not yet available.


Barth, F. 1969. „Introduction“. In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organisation of Cultural Difference, Frederic Barth (ed), 9-38. Boston: Little and Brown.

Barthes, R. 1997. „Semiology and the Urban“. In Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory, Neil Leach (ed.), 166-172. London: Routledge.

Belgrade: maps and plans from the 18th – 21st century. 2008. Belgrade. Avaliable at:

Carlson, M. A. 1993. Places of Performance: The Semiotics of Theatre Architecture. Cornell University Press.

Dorćol. Manuel for lost, found & around. 2010. Belgrade: Supermarket Concept Store &

Đorđević Jovanović, J. 2004. Grci u Beogradu. In Skrivene manjine na Balkanu, Biljana Sikimić (ed.), 157-176. Beograd, Balkanološki institut SANU, Posebna izdanja 82. [Greeks in Belgrade, in Hidden Minorities in the Balkans, Biljana Sikimić (ed.)].

Gottdiener, M. 1983. „Urban Semiotics“. In Remaking the City: Social Science Perspectives on Urban Design, Pipkin, John, Mark La Gory and Judith R. Blau (eds), 101-114. State University of New York Press.

Greimas, A. J. 1990. The Social Sciences: A Semiotic View. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Handelman, D. 1998. Models and Mirrors: Towards an Anthropology of Public Events. New Yotk – Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Istorija Beograda. 1974. „Etnički odnosi u XIX veku“, vol. 2. Vasa Čubrilović (ed.). Beograd: Prosveta.

Janjetović, Z. 2002. „Uloga Cincara u stvaranju srpske elite i modernizaciji srpskog društva“. In Dijalog Povjesničara-istoričara 6, Hans-Georg Fleck, Igor Graovac (eds.), 173-189. Zaklada Friedrich Naumann.

Jordan, J. A. 2006. Memorial Projects as Sites of Social Inetgration in Post-1989 Berlin? German Politics and Society 24 (81-4): 77-94.

Kanitz F. 1985. Srbija. Zemlja i stanovništvo, knj. 1. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga – Rad. [Felix Kanitz, Das Königreich Serbien und das Serbenvolk von der Römerzeit bis zur Gegenwart, 1904, Leipzig: Verlag von Bernh. Meyer].

Kuljić, T. 2006. Kultura sećanja. Teorijska objašnjenja upotrebe prošlosti. Beograd: Čigoja. [Memory Culture: Theoretical Explanations of the Use of the Past].

Lagopoulos, A. Ph. 2009. The social semiotics of space: Metaphor, ideology, and political economy. Semiotica 173 (1/4): 169–213.

Malešević, S. 2011. Ethnicity in Time and Space: A Conceptual Analysis. Critical Sociology 37 (1): 67-82.

Mišković, N. 2010. Bazari i bulevari. Svet života u Beogradu 19. veka. Beograd: Muzej grada Beograda. [Basare und Boulevards. Belgrad im 19. Jahrhundert. 2008. Wien: Böhlau Verlag].

Nedeljkovič, S. 2007. Čast, krv i suze. Ogledi iz antropologije etniciteta i nacionalizma. Beograd: Zlatni zmaj. [Honor, Blood and Tears: Essays on Anthropology of Ethnicity and Nationalism].

Nora, P. 1989. Between memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations 26: 7-24.

Plasković, Z. 2004. „Status i etnički identitet Cincara između očekivanja i stvarnosti“. In Skrivene manjine na Balkanu, Biljana Sikimić (ed.), 147-156. Beograd, Balkanološki institut SANU, Posebna izdanja 82. [Status and Ethnic Identity of Tzintzars: Between Expactations and Reality, in Hidden Minorities in the Balkans, Biljana Sikimić (ed.)].

Popović, D. J. 2008. [1937]. O Cincarima. Prilozi pitanju postanka našeg građanskog društva. Treće izdanje. Beograd: Prometej. [On Tzintzars. Contributions to Considerations of the Foundation of Our Civil Society].

Promicer, K. 2004. „(Ne-)Vidljivost skrivenih manjina na Balkanu. Neka teorijska zapažanja“. In Skrivene manjine na Balkanu, Biljana Sikimić (ur.), 11-24. Beograd: Balkanološki institut SANU, Posebna izdanja 82. [(In-) Visibilities of Hidden Minorities in the Balkans: Some Theoretical Remarks, in Hidden Minorities in the Balkans, Biljana Sikimić (ed.)].

Stojković, B. 2004. „Multikulturalizam, Balkan i planetarna kultura“. Pogovor u Multikulturalizam, A. Semprini, 147-159. Beograd: Clio. [Multiculturalism, the Balkans and Planetary Culture. Afterword to A. Semprini’s Multiculturalisme].

Wertsch, J. 2009. Collective remembering. Semiotica 173 (1/4): 233-247.




How to Cite

Antonijević, Dragana. 2013. “The Story of Dorćol: The ‘Jevremova – Street of Meetings’ Manifestation and the Multicultural Construction of Place of Memory”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 8 (1):149-72.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>