What Makes a Contemporary Werewolf? The Semiological Analysis of Articles about the “Werewolf of Tamnava County”


  • Sonja Žakula Institute of Ethnography SASA, Belgrade, Serbia




mutant, folk interpretations, the werewolf of Tamnava county, semiological analysis


The paper offers a semiological analysis of narratives about the “werewolf of Tamnava County” which were published in Serbian daily newspapers in June 2005. I will attempt to show the ways in which the folk appropriation of terms from scientific discourse is used to lend legitimacy to stories about the mysterious pest, and how this kind of speech about werewolves is nothing new. Narratives about the “werewolf of Tamnava County” will be broken down to their constitutive elements which will be interpreted singularly. Finally, the paper will offer a number of possible interpretations of the function these narratives hold within the specific context of human-animal relations in which they are created.



Download data is not yet available.


Antonijević, D. 2009. Poraženi od sistema: struktura i značenje ličnih priča o gubitnicima tranzicije, u: Etnoantropološki problemi, n.s. 4 (3): 47-65.

Agapkina, T.A. et al. (ur) 2001. Slovenska mitologija – enciklopedijski rečnik, Beograd: Zepter Book World.

Bandić, D. 1997. Carstvo zemaljsko i carstvo nebesko. Beograd: XX vek.

Bourgault du Codrey, C. 2006. The Curse of the Werewolf: Fantasy, Horror and the Beast Within. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.

Bratić, D. 1993. Gluvo doba: Predstave o noći u narodnoj religiji Srba. Beograd: XX vek.

Burdije, P. 1999. Nacrt za jednu teoriju prakse. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

Campion-Vincent, V. 1992. Appearences of Beasts and Mystery-Cats in France. Folklore 103 (2): 160-183.

Cassidy, R. and Mullin, M. 2005. Where the Wild Things Are Now: Domestication Reconsidered. Oxford: Berg.

Cassidy, R. 2005. „Domestication Reconsidered“. U Where the Wild Things Are Now: Domestication Reconsidered, Cassidy, R. And Mullin, M. 2005. Oxford: Berg.

Daglas, M. 2001. Čisto i opasno. Beograd: XX vek.

Đorđević, T. 1953. Vampir i druga bića u našem narodnom verovanju i predanju. Srpski etnografski zbornik LXVI. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka.

Fernandez-Armesto, F. 2004. So you think you’re human? A Brief History of Humankind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Isaacs, A. et al. (eds). 1996. Oxford Concise Dictonary of Science, New York: Oxford University Press.

Kulišić, Š. et al. (ur.). 1970. Srpski mitološki rečnik. Beograd: Nolit.

Leach, E. 1964. „Anthropological aspects of language: animal categories and verbal abuse“. U New Directions in the Study of Language, Lenneberg, E.H. (ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lič, E. 2002. Kultura i komunikacija. Beograd: XX vek.

Mullin, M. 1999. Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 201-224.

Pandian, A. 2008. Pastoral Power in the Postcolony: On the Biopolitics of the Criminal Animal in South India. Cultural Anthropology 3 (1): 85-117.

Ritvo, H. 1987. The Animal Estate: the English and Other Creatures in Victorian England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ritvo, H. 1998. The Platypus and the Mermaid and Other Figments of the Classifying Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.




How to Cite

Žakula, Sonja. 2012. “What Makes a Contemporary Werewolf? The Semiological Analysis of Articles about the ‘Werewolf of Tamnava County’”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 7 (4):1017-32. https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v7i4.7.