Fieldwork and Public Archaeology (or: Why Even the Seemingly Clear Connections Should Be Examined?)
Abstract
Downloads
References
Asman, Alaida. 2018. Oblici zaborava. Beograd: XX vek.
Assmann, Jan. 1995. „Collective Memory and Cultural Identity“. New German Critique 65: 125–133.
Babić, Staša. 2001. „Janus on the bridge“. In Images of Rome: perceptions of ancient Rome in Europe and the United States in the modern age, edited by Richard Hingley, 309–322. Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series no. 44.
Babić, Staša. 2014a. „Afterword: When empires collapse“. In The Edges of the Roman World, edited by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and Staša Babić, 252–256. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Babić, Staša. 2014b. „Zanat arheologa i dijalog sa javnošću“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 563–573. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i3.1
Babić, Staša. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti. Beograd: Clio.
Balaban, Radmila. 2018. „‘Izgubljeni u prevodu’ – uloga arheologije u društvenom kontekstu Srbije“. U Srpska arheologija između teorije i činjenica VI. Arheološko nasleđe. Knjiga apstrakta, uredili Zorica Kuzmanović i Marko A. Janković, 50–53. Filozofski fakultet: Beograd.
David W. Blight (2009). „Memory Boom: Why and Why Now?“. In Memory in Mind and Culture, edited by Pascal Boyer, 238–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crnobrnja, Adam N. 2017. „Arheološko nasleđe u Srbiji danas – briga države ili posao entuzijasta“. Moderna konzervacija 5: 77–96.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2015a. „Dunavski limes u Srbiji: uloga muzeja u interpretaciji i promociji Granica Rimskog carstva“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja 22(1): 365–385.
Cvjetićanin, Tatajana. 2015b. „Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: doba artefakata“. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (3): 557–593. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i3.2
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2018. „Muzejska arheologija u Srbiji i mit o neutralnosti“. Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (3): 575–594. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i3.1
Ćosić, Natalija. 2016. „Autoritet i proizvodnja arheološkog znanja“. Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (3): 749–774. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i3.6
Faulkner, Neil (2000). „Archaeology from below“. Public Archaeology 1(1): 21–33.
Gavrilović, Eliana, Ivana Janković, Ivan Kručičanin, Marina Pejović i Ljubica Vinulović. 2017. Priručnik za muzejsku edukaciju. Beograd: Narodni muzej u Beogradu.
Claire Giraud-Labalte, Kate Pugh, Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga, Brian Smith, Aziliz Vandesande, Clara Thys (eds). 2015. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Krakow: Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe Consortium by the International Cultural Centre (dostupno na: http://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope/outcomes/).
Glasnik SAD 30. 2015. Sesija „Uništavanje arheološke baštine u Srbiji“, održana na XXXVII skupu i godišnjoj skupštini Srpskog arheološkog društva u Kragujevcu, 14. oktobra 2014. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 30: 259–371.
Grima, Reuben. 2016. „But Isn’t All Archaeology ‘Public’ Archaeology?“ Public Archaeology 15 (1): 50–58.
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2007a. Archaeology is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2007b. „Can You Hear Me at the Back? Archaeology, Communication and Society“. European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957108095982
Huyssen, Andreas. 2000. „Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia“. Public Culture 12 (1): 21–38.
Karl, Raimund. 2016. „Archaeological Responses to 5 Decades of Metal Detecting in Austria“. Open Archaeology 2 (1): 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0020
Kajda, Kornelia, Amala Marx, Holly Wright, Julian Richards, Arkadiusz Marciniak, Kai Salas Rossenbach, Michal Pawleta, Monique H. van den Dries, Krijn Boom, Maria Pia Guermandi, Felipe Criado-Boado, David Barreiro, Anita Synnestvedt, Kostantinos Kotsakis, Kostantinos Kasvikis, Eleftheria Theodoroudi, Friedrich Lüth, Mayssoun Issa and Isabelle Frase. 2017. „Archaeology, Heritage, and Social Value: Public Perspectives on European Archaeology“. European Journal of Archaeology 21 (1): 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2017.19
Korać, Miomir, Snežana Golubović, Nemanja Mrđić, Gordana Jeremić i Stefan Pop-Lazić. 2014. Roman Limes in Serbia / Rimski Limes u Srbiji. Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Kuzmanović, Zorica and Vladimir D. Mihajlović. 2015. „Roman Emperors and Identity Construction in Modern Serbia“. Identities 22(4): 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.969269
Matsuda, Akira. 2004. „The Concept of ‘the Public’ and the Aims of Public Archaeology“. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 15: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.5334/257
Matsuda, Akira. 2016. „A Consideration of Public Archaeology Theories“. Public Archaeology 15 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1209377
Matsuda, Akira and Katsuyuki Okamura. 2011. Introduction to New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology, edited by Katsuyuki Okamura and Akira Matsuda, 1–18. London: Springer.
Merriman, Nick (ed). 2004. Public Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Milosavljević, Monika. 2011. „Arheologija nad moštima“. Antropologija 11 (2): 115–140.
Moshenska, Gabriel. 2009. „What is Public Archaeology?“ Present Pasts 1(1): 46–48. https://doi.org/10.5334/pp.7
Moshenska, Gabriel. 2017a. „Introduction: Public Archaeology as Practice and Scholarship Where Archaeology Meets the World“. In Key Concepts in Public Archaeology, edited by Gabriel Moshenska, 1–13. London: University College London Press.
Moshenska, Gabriel (ed). 2017b. Key Concepts in Public Archaeology. London: University College London Press.
Oldham, Mark. 2017. „Bridging the Gap: Classification, Theory and Practice in Public Archaeology“. Public Archaeology 16 (3–4): 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398
Pruitt, Tara C. 2011. „Authority and the production of knowledge in archaeology“, Doctoral thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.15966
Ramos, Maria, and David Duganne (prepared by). 2000. Exploring Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Archaeology. Washington, D.C.: Reprot by Harris Interactive on the behalf of the Society for American Archaeology.
Richardson, Lorna-Jane and Jaime Almansa-Sánchez. 2015. „Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics“. World Archaeology 47 (2): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599
Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2008. Archaeology Matters. Action Archaeology in the Modern World. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Scarre, Chris and Goeffrey Scarre. 2006. Introduction to The Ethics of Archaeology. Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice, edited by Chris Scarre and Geoffrey Scarre, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schadla-Hall, Tim. 1999. „Editorial: Public Archaeology“. European Journal of Archaeology 2 (2): 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.147
Skeates, Robin, John Carman and Carol McDavid. 2012. „Introduction: questioning archaeology’s place in the world“. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology, edited by Robin Skeates, John Carman and Carol McDavid, 1–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meisels, Tamar. 2009. „‘Historical Rights’ to Land“. In Territorial Rights, edited by Tamar Meisles, 31–49. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9262-6_3
Marek, Tamm. 2013. „Beyond History and Memory: New Perspectives in Memory Studies History“. Compass 11 (6): 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12050
Vuković, Jasna i Vujović, Miroslav. 2014. „Od informacije do poruke: arheologija i mediji u Srbiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 609–624. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i3.4
All articles in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows authors and users to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the article under the same conditions as in the licence.
The CC BY SA license permits non-commercial and commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published by Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology is retained by the author(s).
Authors grant to the Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Copyright and source must be acknowledged and a link must be made to the article's DOI.