Harmonization of the agricultural policy of the Republic of Serbia with the the European Union acquis – environmental protection and impact on the position of farmers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v18i3.11Keywords:
Common Agricultural Policy, European Union, agricultural producers, EU accession, economic changes, cultural changesAbstract
Agricultural policy is one of the key public policies and has a significant impact on farmers as well as on the population living in rural areas. The policy comprises various development goals and represent the starting point for the adoption of regulations that have a direct impact on agricultural producers and their lives. The paper first analyzes the current agricultural policy in Serbia. The second part of the paper is dedicated to the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union, followed by an analysis of the level of harmonisation of the agricultural policy and regulations of the Republic of Serbia with the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union. Bearing in mind that the Common Agricultural Policy is currently undergoing transformation and that the implementation of new measures is expected from 2023, it is analysed how this change will affect Serbia in the coming years, given that the new Agriculture Strategy is to be adopted as the current one expires in 2024. The paper specifically analyzes how measures for environmental protection and climate change will affect the lives of the rural population. Introduction and implementation of new and increasingly complex measures, such as new ways of agricultural production, soil cultivation, reduced use of pesticides and artificial fertilizers, as well as greater representation of organic production bring significant benefits to the environment and contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and to climate change mitigation. Until now, farmers have been expected to change their former traditional approaches to agricultural production, among which the burning crop residues stands out as important for the environment, and in the future the greater demands will be placed on farmers, especially having in mind climate change mitigation and adaptation measures. As the paper concludes, the key role in this process must be played by the farmers themselves, who are expected to change, often traditional patterns of production and living in rural areas.
Downloads
References
Albrecht, Juliane, Nikolić Popadić, Sofija. 2022. „Legal challenges of restricting land use for natural flood protection in the hinterland”. In T. Hartmann, L. Slavíková, M. E. Wilkinson (Eds.), Spatial Flood Risk Management: Implementing Catchment-based Retention and Resilience on Private Land, 33–51. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379534
Bauer, Michael W. Guy B. Peters, Jon Pierre, Kutsal Yesilkagit, and Stefan Becker (eds.). 2021. Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bello, Walden. 2009. The food wars. London and New York: Verso.
Brass, Tom. 2000. Peasants, populism, and postmodernism: The return of the agrarian myth. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass Publishers.
Burds, Jeffrey. 1998. Peasant dreams and market politics: labor migration and the Russian village, 1861–1905. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cairney, Paul. 2019. Understanding Public Policy, Theories and Issues, 2nd Edition. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Čolović, Ivan. 1997. Politika simbola: ogledi o političkoj antropologiji. Beograd: Radio B92.
Danielsen, Jens Hartig. 2013. EU Agricultural Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dessart, F. J., Rommel, J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Thomas, F., Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Espinosa-Goded, M., Zagórska, K., Czajkowski, M., van Bavel, R. 2021. Farmers and the new green architecture of the EU common agricultural policy: a behavioural experiment. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/718383
Đurić Mila. 2018. Poljoprivreda i ruralni razvoj Srbije u procesu evropskih integracija, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad.
Ellis, Frank. 1992. Agricultural Policies in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Głowacka-Grajper, Małgorzata. 2018. „Memory in Post-communist Europe: Controversies over identity, conflicts, and nostalgia”. East European Politics and Societies 32(4): 924–935.
Götz, Volkmar. 2012. „Das Recht der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik – Kontinuität, Wandel, Systematik”, in: José Martinez (Hrsg.), Die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik vor neuen Herausforderungen, 50 Jahre Institut für Landwirtschaftsrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Griffin, Keith. 1990. The political economy of agrarian change: An essay on the Green Revolution. London and Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Grimm, Heike M. 2019. Public Policy Research in the Global South. Cham: Springer.
Harwood, Jonathan. 2012. Europe’s Green Revolution and Others Since: The Rise and Fall of Peasant-Friendly Plant Breeding. New York: Routledge.
Isić, Momčilo. 2000. Seljaštvo u Srbiji 1918–1941: Socijalno-ekonomski položaj seljaštva. Knjiga 1. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva i Institut za noviju istoriju Srbije.
Jack, Brian. 2009. Agriculture and EU environmental law. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Marina Kesner-Škreb. 2008.„Zajednička poljoprivredna politika Europske unije”. Financijska teorija i praksa, 4.
Milenković, Marko. 2010. „Prihvatanje evropskih standarda u oblasti ekonomskog prava i (anticipirane) kultur-ne promene u Republici Srbiji”. Etnoantropološki problemi, 5(1): 111 – 135. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i1.6
Milenković, Miloš. 2013. „On Maintaining National Identity and Cultural Heritage in European Integrations: Basic Misconceptions and Important Possibilities”. Etnoantropološki problemi/Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 8(2): 453–470. https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v8i2.6
Milenković, Miloš. 2016. „Identitetske subvencije: Identitet „skriven” u prividno neutralnoj (ekonomskoj) politici”. U: Milenković, Miloš. Antropologija multikulturalizma, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet i SGC, 207–228.
Milenković, Miloš. 2022. „Metodologija društvenih nauka i humanistike u doba populističkog poricanja nauke”. Antropologija 22(3): 9–19.
Naumović, Slobodan. 2009. Upotreba tradicije u političkom i javnom zivotu Srbije na kraju dvadesetog i početkom dvadeset prvog veka. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Naumović, Slobodan. 2013. Fields of paradox: three case studies on the Europeanisation of agriculture in Serbia. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar. Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.
Nikolić Popadić, Sofija. 2020. „Način upotrebe poljoprivrednog zemljišta i zdravlje ljudi u Republici Srbiji i Evropskoj uniji”. U Promišljanja aktuelnih društvenih izazova: regionalni i globalni kontekst, uredili Ivana Arsić, Vladimir, Mentus 86–107. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.
Nikolić Popadić, Sofija. 2022. „Zabrana spaljivanja žetvenih ostataka na poljoprivrednom zemljištu”. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 94(2): 465–510 https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv94-36068
Nikolić Popadić, Sofija. 2023. „Klimatske promene i poljoprivredna proizvodnja – pravni i strateški okvir”. U Klimatske promene – pravni i društveni izazovi, uredili Sofija Nikolić Popadić, Marko Milenković, 169–195. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.
Papadopoulos, Apostolos G. 2015. „The Impact of the CAP on Agriculture and Rural Areas of EU Member States”. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 4(1): 22–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976015574054
Ristić, Lela. 2016. „Spoljni izazovi razvoja agrara Republike Srbije”. U Institucionalne promene kao determi-nanta privrednog razvoja Republike Srbije, redaktor Vlastimir Leković, 211–229. Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
Simantov, A. 1973. „Economic, Social and Political Priorities in Agricultural Policy Formulation in Industria-lized Countries”. Conference International Association of Agricultural Economists, August 19–30, 1973, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stojiljković, Zoran i Dušan Spasojević. 2018. Populistički Zeitgeist u „proevropskoj” Srbiji. Politička misao 55(3): 104–128. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.55.3.04
Van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe. 2009. The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Sources
European Commission. 2021. Commission staff working document Serbia 2021 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2021 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy, SWD/2021/288 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021SC0288
European Commission. 2022. Commission staff working document Serbia 2022 Report Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2022 Communication on EU Enlargement policy, SWD/2022/338 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0338
European Court of Auditors, Special Report No 21, Greening: a more complex income support scheme, not yet environmentally effective, 2017 https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR17_21/SR_GREENING_EN.pdf (pristupljeno 12.2.2023)
European Commission. 2023. The common agricultural policy at a glance. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en#cap-2023-27 (pristupljeno 12.2.2023)
Eurostat. 2022. Enlargement countries – agriculture, forestry and fishing statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Enlargement_countries_-_agriculture,_forestry_and_fishing_statistics (pristupljeno 12.2.2023)
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede. 2022. Izveštaj o stanju u poljoprivredi u Republici Srbiji u 2021. godini, Knjiga I. http://www.minpolj.gov.rs/download/ZK-2021-I-knjiga.pdf?script=lat (pristuplje-no 28.4.2023)
Ministarstvo za evropske integracije Republike Srbije. 2023. Pregovaračka poglavlja. https://www.mei.gov.rs/srp/dokumenta/eu-dokumenta/pristupni-pregovori-sa-eu/pregovaracki-klasteri/ (pri-stupljeno 12.2.2023)
Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013, OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1–186.
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013.
Strategija poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja Republike Srbije za period 2014–2024. godine, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 85/2014.
Zakon o podsticajima u poljoprivredi i ruralnom razvoju, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 10/2013, 142/2014, 103/2015 i 101/2016.
Zakon o poljoprivredi i ruralnom razvoju, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 41/2009, 10/2013 – dr. zakon, 101/2016, 67/2021 – dr. zakon i 114/2021.
Zakon o poljoprivrednom zemljištu, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 62/2006, 65/2008 – dr. zakon, 41/2009, 112/2015, 80/2017 i 95/2018 – dr. zakon.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Consolidated version), Official Journal of the European Union, C 202/47, 7.6.2016.
Zakić, Zorka, Žaklina Stojanović. 2008. Ekonomika agrara. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku declatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


