Premises of the Educational System versus Professional Expectations of the Performing Arts on the Peripheries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v20i1.10

Keywords:

performing arts, higher education in performing arts, informal professional development, independent troupes, peripheries

Abstract

This article presents the findings of 11 focus groups with a total of 59 performing artists from different countries in Southern and Central Europe, on the topic of the ‘need to strengthen the capacity’ of this group of actors in the international art sector. The research is grounded in contemporary career theories, the hybridization of professional engagement, and precariat in the arts sector. The study mapped significant differences in national as well as regional contexts within Central and Southern Europe, but also the widespread gap between formal education and informal professional development and lifelong learning in the field of performing arts. Despite the Bologna Process, formal education has largely remained locally specific, partly due to different traditions, which has led to the situation where, in some countries of the region, the higher education infrastructure in performing arts is well developed, while in others it is underdeveloped or nonexistent. Where it does exist, state higher education in performing arts predominantly focuses on performance skills and techniques, often neglecting interdisciplinary approaches and the contextualization of artistic work within social and political theories or practices. A key factor in strengthening the capacity of performing artists lies in international platforms, including both collaborative projects and donors who finance and facilitate such projects, primarily the European Union, but also other organizations. These projects and platforms simultaneously serve as sources of pressure on artists to engage with contemporary social issues and to assume multiple roles within the cultural sector, which requires additional sets of skills, knowledge, and competencies. In this context, many research participants identified producers and managers interested in working within smaller collectives and independent troupes as one of the missing profiles, those professionals who possess the competencies for both operational and administrative tasks as well as for providing creative support to the artistic process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arthur, Michael B. and Rousseau, Denise M. 2001. “Introduction: The Boundaryless Career as a New Employment Principle”. In The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, edited by Michael B. Arthur and Denise M. Rousseau, 3-20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barada, Valerija, Jaka Primorac i Edgar Burčić. 2016. Osvajanje prostora rada: uvjeti rada organizacija civilnog društva na području suvremene kulture i umjetnosti. Zagreb: Kulturanova.

Bennett, Dawn. 2008. “Dancer or Dance Artist? Dance Careers and Identity”. The International Journal Of the Arts In Society 3 (3): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1866/CGP/v03i03/35472

Bennett, Dawn. 2009. “Academy and the Real World”. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (3): 305–324. DOI: 10.1177/1474022209339953

Briscoe, Jon P. and Douglas T. Hall. 2006. “The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 69: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.002

Cvetičanin, Predrag, Tatjana Nikolić, Nađa Bobičić. 2023. Rod i rad u kulturnom polju u Srbiji. Beograd: Asocijacija Nezavisna kulturna scena Srbije, Niš: Fakultet umetnosti.

Cvetičanin, Predrag, neobjavljeno. Vežbe iz anatomije kulture: 10 godina monitoringa trošenja budžetskih sredstava za kulturu u Republici Srbiji. Beograd: Asocijacija nezavisna kulturna scena Srbije, Niš: Centar za empirijske studije kulture Jugoistočne Evrope. Preliminarni rezultati studije predstavljeni 5. decembra 2024. godine u Medija centru u Beogradu.

Defillippi, Robert J. And Michael B. Arthur. 1994. “The boundaryless career: a competency-based perspective”. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 (4): 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403

Cooper, Paul. 2007. “Knowing your ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty in UK Higher Education”. Quality in Higher Education 13 (1): 19-29, https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272698

Dragićević Šešić, Milena. 2019. “Contemporary arts in adaptable quality management: Questioning entrepreneurism as panacea in Europe”. In The Routledge Companion to Arts Management, edited by Byrnes, William and Aleksandar Brkić, 39-53. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351030861

Dragićević Šešić, Milena. 2024. “Tears in the classroom: teaching and learning cultural policy in a multicultural environment. Can the subaltern talk?”. International Journal of Cultural Policy, February, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2024.2305263

OECD. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

Farinha, Cristina. 2012. Bound to Mobility: The building up of a performing arts community in the European Union, PhD Dissertation, Porto, Fundação para a Ciênca e a Tecnologia – Ministerio da Educação e Ciência.

Gačanović, Ivana. 2010. „Problem globalnog rangiranja univerziteta ili o iskušenjima savremenih visokoobrazovnih sistema”. Etnoantropološki problemi, n. s. 5 (2): 185-204. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i2.9

Greenhaus, Jeffrey H., Gerard A. Callanan and Marco DiRenzo. 2008. “A boundaryless perspective on careers”. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume I -Micro Approaches, edited by Julian Barling and Cary L. Cooper, 277–299. London: SAGE Publications ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n16

Ilić, Isidora. 2021. „Status samostalnog umetnika u Republici Srbiji: profesija, dužničko ropstvo ili socijalni slučaj?”. U RAD u umetnosti: zbornik Udruženja likovnih umetnika Srbije, uredili Ramujkić Vahida i Milan Đorđević, 159-166. Beograd: ULUS.

Ivić, Milica. 2020. „Obrazovanje u oblasti izvođačkih umetnosti u Srbiji između akademskih i samoobrazovnih praksi”. Etnoantropološki problemi 15 (2): 581-600. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v15i2.11

Jyrämä, Annukka, Anna Maria Ranczakowska, eds. 2023. Perspectives on Mentorship –Reinventing Mentoring in Arts and Creative Industries Management. Talinn: Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre Press.

Klaić, Dragan. 2007. Mobility of imagination: a companion guide to international cultural cooperation. Budapest: Center for Arts and Culture, Central European University.

Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at work: proximity of art and capitalism. Winchester: UK; Washington, USA: Zero Books.

Letunic, Ana. 2019. “Instrumental value of culture and curatorial responses from the European independent performing arts field. A plea for an arts-driven cultural policy research”. In Forschungsfeld Kulturpolitik – eine Kartierung von Theorie und Praxis, edited by: Daniel Grad, Katharina Schröck and Aron Weigl, 341-349. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

Liessemann, Konrad Paul. 2008. Teorija neobrazovanosti: Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.

Marković Božović, Ksenija. 2020. „Negovanje pozorišne publike kao društvena funkcija savremenih pozorišta”. Zborniku Matice srpske za društvene nauke 175 (3): 437-451

Marković Božović, Ksenija. 2021. “Public theatre’s social role and its audience”. Teme 45 (1): 213-229. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190702012M

Milen, Anneli. 2001. What do we know about capacity building? A overview of existing knowledge and good practice. Geneve: Department of Health Service Provision, World Health Organization. https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/Milen-2001-What.pdf

Nenić, Iva and Tatjana Nikolic. 2022. “Treball I Lideratge Femení En La Música. Contextos, Restriccions, futur(s): Contexts, Constraints, future(s)”. Debats. Revista De Cultura, Poder I Societat 136 (2):10-26. https://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats-136-2.1.

Nikolić, Tatjana. 2020. „Društveni angažman mladih umetnica u digitalnom kontekstu”. Kultura 169: 86-112. https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2069086N.

PEARLE (Live Performance Europe). n.d. On the European Stage 2019-2024: Priorities for the live performance sector. Brussels: PEARLE. https://www.pearle.eu/publication/on-the-european-stage-20192024-priorities-for-the-live-performance-sector

Praznik, Katja. 2021. Art Work: Invisible Labor and the Legacy of Yugoslav Socialism. University of Toronto Press.

Primorac, Jaka. 2021. Od projekta do projekta: rad i zaposlenost u kulturnom sektoru. Zagreb: BLOK.

Ramujkić, Vahida i Milan Đorđević, uredili. 2021. RAD u umetnosti: zbornik Udruženja likovnih umetnika Srbije. Beograd: ULUS.

Ristić, Irena. 2021. Mala vrata: o zajedničkom i putevima radikalne imaginacije. Beograd: Geopoetika.

Sarvanović, Ana. 2017, „Umetničko obrazovanje u doba kognitivnog kapitalizma”, Andragoške studije, br. 11, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.5937/andstud1702063S

Vincs, Kim. 2005. “Follow your heart and something will come: Subjective factors in the sustainability of early to mid-careers contemporary dance artists”, Dance Rebooted: Initializing the Grid Conference Proceedings. Tertiary Dance Council of Australia. https://ausdance.org.au/articles/details/follow-your-heart-and-something-will-come

Downloads

Published

2025-04-03

How to Cite

Markovic Božović , Ksenija, Tatjana Nikolić, and Jovana Karaulić. 2025. “Premises of the Educational System Versus Professional Expectations of the Performing Arts on the Peripheries”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 20 (1):243–264. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v20i1.10.

Issue

Section

Other Humanities and Social Sciences