Antiquarians between Nature and Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V12I3.5Keywords:
antiquarians, scientific revolution, theory, archaeology, natural sciences, dichotomy artifact/ecofactAbstract
From the second half of the 16th century to the beginning of the 18th century, the foundations of modern science were laid through the wide-ranging changes in comprehension of both nature and European societies, today labeled as “scientific revolution”. By the end of this period in the history of European science, the interpretation of universe did not necessarily include the divine intervention and, along with the objectification of nature, the past was objectified as well.
The approaches articulated during the scientific revolution were applied to the investigation into the human past in the works of the antiquarians. The new ways of observation, description, and collection of antiquities were generated as a part of the wider interests in natural history. On the other hand, it may be argued that the antiquarians’ practice joined together the approaches we would today judge as opposed: the ones derived from social theory , as well as the ones based upon natural sciences. In their studies of the past, the antiquarians equally used written sources as well as “naturalistic” methods, such as careful observation, establishment of classifications, or experimental design.
Taking into account the significant contribution of antiquarians to the establishment of disciplinary foundations of archaeology, the paper aims to point to some new possibilities of approaching the study of the past, primarily beyond the established dichotomy of artifacts/ecofacts, and to offer the ways of bridging the present divisions inside the discipline.
Downloads
References
Adler, Mortimer Jerome. 1993. The four dimensions of philosophy: metaphysical, moral, objective, categorical. New York: Macmillan.
Ashworth, William B. Jr. 2003. “Natural History and the Emblematic World View”. In The scientific revolution: the essential readings, ed. By Marcus Hellyer, 132–156. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Banchig, Pierluigi. 2012. Balcani con tesi: i luogi di Roma anticha nel confronto fra Asburgo e Ottomani. In La Scienza delle Armi: Luigi Ferdinando Marsili 1658–1730, a cura del Museo di Palazzo Poggi, 59–79. Bologna: Pendragon.
Bene, Sandor. 2006. ACTA PACIS – PEACE WITH THE MUSLIMS (Luigi Ferdinando Marsili’s Plan for the Publication of the Documents of Karlowitz PeaceTreaty. Camonae Hungaricae 3: 113–146.
– – –. 2010. “Illyria or What You Will: Luigi Ferdinando Marsigli’s and Pavao Ritter Vitezović’s ‘Mapping’ of the Borderlands Recaptured from the Ottomans”. In Whose Love of Which Country, ed. byBalázs Trencsényi and Márton Zászkaliczky, 351–403. Leiden: Brill.
Brajzah, Ernst. 2009. Istoriografija: stari vek, srednji vek, novo doba. Beograd: CLIO.
Burns, William E. 2001. The scientific revolution: an encyclopedia. Santa Barbara:
ABC-CLIO.
Daniel, Glyn. 1975. One hundred and fifty years of archaeology. London: Duckworth.
Fuko, Mišel. 1971. Riječi i stvari. Nolit: Beograd.
Gherardi, Raffaella. 1980. Potere e constituzione a Vienna fra Sei e Settecento: Il „buon ordine” di Luigi Ferdinando Marsili. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Gherardi, Raffaella. 2010. „Introduzione. Sul confine dell’Impero e dell’Europa: la ‘prudenza politica’ e la scienza di Luigi Ferdinando Marsili”. In La politica, la scienza, le armi: Luigi Ferdinando Marsili e la construzione della frontiera dell’Impero e dell’Europa, a cura di Raffaella Gherardi, 7–19. Bologna: CLUEB.
Gillings, Mark. 2011. Chorography, Phenomenology and the Antiquarian Tradition.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Volume 21, Issue 1: 53–64.
Grin, Kevin. 2003. Uvod u arheologiju. Beograd: CLIO.
Hellyer, Marcus 2003. The Scientific Revolution: The Essential Readings. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Henry, John. 2002. The Scientific Revolution and Origins of Modern Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kaljanac, Adnan. 2014. Historija arheologije. U potrazi za prošlošću. Sarajevo: Univerzitet u Sarajevu.
Kristiansen, Kristian. 2014. Towards a New Paradigm? The Third Science Revolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, Vol. 22: 11–34.
Mihajlović, Vladimir V. 2015. L. F. Marsilji – prvi antikvar Srbije. Etnoantropološki problemi 10/3: 595–617.
– – –. 2016. „Luiđi F. Marsilji i recepcija antičkog nasleđa u srpskoj arheologiji”. Doktorska disertacija. Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Milosavljević, Monika i Aleksandar Palavestra. 2017. Zloupotreba prirodnih nauka u (pseudo)arheologiji. Etnoantropološki problemi 12/3: 825-851.
Momigliano, Arnold. 1950. Ancient History and the Antiquarian. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 13/3-4: 285–315.
Moser, Stephanie. 2014. Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between the Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration. Isis Vol. 105, No. 1: 58–99.
Nagy, Levente. 2010. „La frontiera, il buongoverno e l’armonia mondiale. L. F. Marsili sulla frontiera della Transilvania”. In La politica, la scienza, le armi: Luigi Ferdinando Marsili e la construzione della frontiera dell’Impero e dell’Europa, a cura di Raffaella Gherardi, 173–197. Bologna: CLUEB.
Novaković, Predrag. 2003. Osvajanje prostora. Razvoj prostorske in krajinske arheologije. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.
Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
Penington, Donald H. 2002. Evropa u sedamnaestom veku. Beograd: CLIO.
Peri, Marvin. 2000. Intelektualna istorija Evrope. Beograd: Clio.
Piggott, Stuart. 1976. Ruins in a Landsape: Essays in Antiquarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
– – –. 1978. Antiquity Depicted. Aspects of Archaeological Illustration. London: Themes and Hudson.
Schnapp, Alain. 1996. The Discovery of the Past. London: British Museum Press.
Shanks, Michael and Christopher Witmore. 2010. Echoes across the Past. Chorography and topography in antiquarian engagements with place. Performance Research 15(4): 97–106.
Stoye, John. 1994. Marsigli’s Europe, 1680–1730: The Life and Times of Luigi Ferdinando Marsigli, Soldier and Virtuoso. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thomas, Julian. 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2008. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.