From feeling to naming: A sensitive approach to managerial newspeak through bullying at work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v10i2.8Keywords:
clinical sociology, emotion, language, management discourse, managerial discourse, newspeak, workplace bullyingAbstract
By accessing language, an individual is granted the means to represent experiences and to share meaning. However, ill-being resulting from workplace bullying makes it hard for the subject to put his/her experience into words. I explored this uneasiness through qualitative research conducted through an interdisciplinary approach. My fieldwork led me to raise questions about the influence of modern managerial discourse on the individual and his/her relation to language. After conducting in-depth interviews with individuals confronted with bullying at work and crossing their narratives with information from organisational websites, I suggest that modern managerial discourse hinders the expression of emotions and thereby the understanding of subjective experiences (both the informants’ understanding of their own subjective experience and the understanding of their experiences by others). I argue that this process is rooted in an internalization of managerial discourse, which weakens the subject as it diminishes his/her enunciative autonomy and limits his/her ability to make sense of his/her emotional experiences. This article considers these findings. Through excerpts from organisational communications, the first part calls on the heuristic dimension of knowing via the senses to question the subjective influence of managerial discourse. The narrative of an experience of workplace bullying then allows for display of the ambivalence of managerial discourse. It appears to be a tool both enabling and hindering subjective expression, as it allows sharing of facts at the expense of sharing emotions. Considering my argument that the internalization of managerial discourse by the subject turns this discourse into “managerial newspeak”, the third and concluding part of the article addresses the issue of sharing understanding of psychosocial processes in scientific work.
Downloads
References
Aulagnier, Piera. 1975. La violence de l’interprétation. Du pictogramme à l’énoncé. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bakhtine, Mikhaïl. 1977 [1929]. Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Paris: Minuit.
Bilheran, Ariane. 2006. Le harcèlement moral. Paris: Armand Colin.
Boltanski, Luc and Ève Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
Boltanski, Luc and Ève Chiapello. 2007. The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
Both, Anne. 2007. Les Managers et leurs discours. Anthropologie de la rhétorique managériale. Pessac: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Paris: Seuil, Points.
Boussard, Valérie. 2008. Sociologie de la gestion. Les faiseurs de performance, Paris : Belin
Butler, Judith. 2008 [1997]. Le pouvoir des mots: discours de haine et politique du performatif. Paris: éditions Amsterdam.
Canut, Cécile. 2000. Le nom des langues ou les métaphores de la frontière. Ethnologies comparées 1 [online]. http://recherche.univ-montp3.fr/cerce/r1/c.c.htm (consulted on 22/05/2015).
Crapanzano, Vincent. 1994. Réflexions sur une anthropologie des émotions. Terrain, 22: 109-117.
Devereux, Georges. 1980 [1967]. De l’angoisse à la méthode dans les sciences du comportement. Paris: Flammarion.
Gaulejac (de), Vincent. 2008. La sociologie clinique entre psychanalyse et socioanalyse. SociologieS [online]. http://sociologies.revues.org/1713 (consulted on 14/05/2015).
Gaulejac (de), Vincent et Fabienne Hanique, Pierre Roche (ed.). 2007. La sociologie clinique. Enjeux théoriques et méthodologiques. Ramonville Saint-Agne: érès.
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen C. Levinson. 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haden, Catherine A. and Rachel A. Haine, Robyn Fivush. 1997. Developing narrative structure in parent-child reminiscing across the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 33 (2): 295-307.
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1983. The Managed Heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85 (3): 551-575.
Joffe, Helene. 2007. Le pouvoir de l'image : persuasion, émotion et identification. Diogène, 217: 102-115.
Krieg-Planque, Alice. 2012. « La “novlangue” : une langue imaginaire au service de la critique du “discours autre” ». In L’hétérogène à l’œuvre dans la langue et les discours. Hommage à Jacqueline Authier-Revuz, ed. Sonia Branca-Rosoff et al., 69-83. Limoges : Editions Lambert-Lucas.
Kuzmanić Tonči, Ante and Suzana Sedmak, Boris Kobeja. 2005. “Managerial discourse as an aspect of globalization: from self-management to management”. Managing the Process of Globalisation in New and Upcoming EU Members, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia [online].: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/961-6573-03-9/kuzmanic.pdf (consulted on 29/01/2013).
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1955. “The structural study of myth”. The Journal of American Folklore 70 (268): 428-444.
Norlyk, Birgitte. 2009. Management discourse: Talking the power walk in organizational communication. Language at Work - Bridging Theory and Practice 4 [online]. http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/law/article/view/6186 (consulted on 31/01/2013).
O’Moore, Mona and Niall Crowley. 2011. The clinical effects of workplace bullying: a critical look at personality using SEM. International Journal of Workplace Health Management 4 (1): 67-83.
Orwell, George. 2008 [1949]. Appendix to 1984, ed. George Orwell, 312-326. London: Penguin Books.
Rimé, Bernard and Catrin Finkenauer, Olivier Luminet, Emmanuelle Zech, Pierre Philippot. 1998. Social sharing of emotion: new evidence and new questions. European Review of Social Psychology 9 (1): 145-189.
Stein, Howard F. 2000. From Countertransference to Social Theory: A Study of Holocaust Thinking in U.S. Business Dress. Ethos 28 (3): 346-378.
Vandevelde-Rougale, Agnès. 2012. L’organidrame ou organiscope: un dispositif clinique pour approcher la complexité des organisations. Revue ¿ Interrogations ? 15 [online]. http://www.revue-interrogations.org/L-organidrame-ou-organiscope-un (consulted on 26/05/2015).
Vandevelde-Rougale, Agnès. 2014. Malaise dans la symbolisation. La subjectivité à l’épreuve de la novlangue managériale [Facing managerial newspeak. Uneasiness in symbolization]. PhD diss. Paris Diderot-Paris VII University (France).
Vandevelde-Rougale, Agnès et Pascal Fugier. 2014. « Discours managérial ». In Dictionnaire des risques psychosociaux, ed. Philippe Zawieja and Franck Guarnieri, 210-211. Paris: Seuil.
Wilce, James M. 2009. Language and Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Živković, Milan. 2012. Orvelov novogovor: između literarne distopije i stvarnosti. Civitas: časopis za društvena istraživanja II (3): 56-71.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.