Theoretical orientation and validity of observation in sociology and anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v9i2.2Keywords:
observation, validity, qualitative and quantitative orientation, analytical inductionAbstract
This article discusses closely related issues of the theoretical orientation and the validity of the application of the method of observation in sociology and anthropology. It was preceded by a text which discussed issues of meeting the principles of objectivity, systematicity and reliability when using observation as a research method. General problem of the relationship between theory and research in the application of observation will be analyzed in the subsequent article.
Introductory section shows the general framework of a hypothetical - deductive conception of science and the role of the method of observation in this context. The next section of the article analyzes the effort of finding denying cases and discusses the limits of the method of analytical induction. This section deals with the influence of data analysis in qualitative form obtained by (usually participatory) observation and constructing explanations on the validity of the observation. The next section of the article shows the possibility of increasing the validity of the observation by including other sources and methods of data collection. The final section shows the impact of over-emphasizing the epistemological difference between qualitative and quantitative orientation in sociology and anthropology on the possibility of increasing the validity of the observation as a research method.
Downloads
References
Angrosino, M.V., Mays de Perez, K.A. 2000. „Rethinking observation: From method to context“. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Atkinson, Paul, and Martyn Hammersley. 1998. „Ethnography and Participant Observation“. In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Norman K. Denzin, Ivonna S. Lincoln (eds). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Bales, Robert F. 2009/1950. „Interaction Process Analysis“. In The Content Analysis Reader, Klaus Krippendorfand, Mary Angela Bock (eds), 75-83. Los Angeles: Sage.
Becker, Howard S. 1996. „The Epistemology of Qualitative Research“. In Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, Richard Jessor, Anne Colby and Richard A. Shweder (eds), 53–71. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bendix, Reinhard. 1963. Concepts and generalizations in comparative social studies. American Sociological Review 28: 536.
Bogdanović, Marija. 1993. Metodološke studije. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Branković, Srbobran. 2009. Metodi iskustvenog istraživanja društvenih pojava. Beograd: Univerzitet Megatrend.
Bryman, Alan . 2001/ 2012. Social Research Methods,. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1964. Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York- London: The Free Press, Collier-Macmillan Limited.
Douglas, Jack, D. 1976. Investigative social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland and Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of Anthropology. London, Sterling: Pluto Press.
Fine, Gary Alan. 1999. Field labor and ethnographic reality. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28:532-540.
Gordon, Tuula and Elina Lahelma. 2003. From etnography to life history: tracing transitions of school students. Inernational Journal of Social Research Methodology, Theory and Practice 6 (3) July – September: 245-254.
Goody, Jack. 1961. Religion and ritual. The definitional problem. British Journal of Sociology 12 (2): 142-164.
Hammersley, Martyn. 1992. „By what Criteria should Ethnographic Research be Judged“. In What`s Wrong with Ethnography, M. Hammersley (ed). London: Routledge.
Heyns, Roger W. and Alvin F. Zander. 1953. „Observation of Group Behavior“. In Research methods in behavioral sciences, Leon Festinger and Daniel Katz (eds). New York: The Dryden Press.
Ilić, Vladimir. 1990. Karakteristike uporednog pristupa u delu L.H.Morgana. Sociologija 32 (1-2): 33-42.
Ilić, Vladimir. 2002. Dirkemov doprinos razvoju uporednog pristupa. Zbornik Filozofskog fakulteta, Serija B. Društvene nauke XVII, Spomenica Mihaila V. Popovića: 225-263.
Ilić, Vladimir. 2013. „Odnos posmatranja i drugih istraživačkih postupaka“. U Promene osnovnih struktura društva Srbije u periodu ubrzane transformacije, Mladen Lazić i Slobodan Cvejić (prir.), 78-96. Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Lazarsfeld, Paul.F. and Allen.H. Barton. 1969. „Qualitative measurement: A codification of techniques for social science“. In The nature and scope of social science: A critical anthology, L. I. Krimerman (ed), 514-559. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.
Mabry, Edward A. 1975. An instrument for assesing content themes in group interaction. Speech Monographs 42:291-297.
Mayntz, Renate, Kurt Holm and Roger Huebner. 1979. Introduction to Empirical Sociology. Bungay, Suffolk: Penguin Education.
McCall, George. J. 1984. Structured Field Observation. Annual Review of Sociology 10: 263-282.
McKeon, Richard. 1969. Gibson Winter`s “Elements of a social ethic“. Journal of Religion 49: 77-84.
Mead, Margaret. 1933. More Comprehensive Field Methods. American Anthropologist 35: 1-15.
Milić, Vojin. 1978. Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit.
Milić, Vojin. 1986. Sociologija saznanja. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.
Nejgel, Ernest. 1974. Struktura nauke, Beograd: Nolit.
Neuman, William Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods – Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 6th edition. Boston: Pearson.
Novaković, Staniša. 2007. Filozofija nauke u Srbiji 1960-1990, (Osvrti i kritike), Izabrani radovi, IV. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
Peel, John David Yeadon. 1969. Understanding alien belief systems. British Journal of Sociology 20 (1): 69-84.
Poole, Scott M. and Joseph P. Folger. 2009. „Modes of Observation and the Validation of Interaction Analysis Scheme“. In The Content Analysis Reader, Klaus Krippendorfand and Mary Angela Bock (eds), 367-375. Los Angeles: Sage.
Qyen, Else. 1990. „The Imperfection of Comparisons. In Comparative Methodology – Theory and Practice in International Social Research, Else Oyen (ed). Newbury Park California, New Delhi: SAGE.
Redklif–Braun, Alfred Redžinald. 1982. Struktura i funkcija u primitivnom društvu. Beograd: Prosveta.
Radin, Paul. 1965/1933. The Method and Theory of Ethnology, An Essay in Criticism, With an Introduction by Arthur J. Vidich. New York - London: Basic Books, Inc.
Sapir, Edvard. 1984. Ogledi iz kulturne antropologije. Beograd: Prosveta.
Sjoberg, Gideon and Roger Nett. 1968. A Methodology for Social Research. New York, Evanston and London: Harper and Row Publishers.
Stacey, Margaret. 1969. Methods of Social Research. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Braunschweug: Pergamon Press.
Taylor, Ian. 1978. „Football Mad: A Speculative Sociology of Football Hooliganism“. In Footbal Hooliganism: The Wider Context, Roger Ingham (ed.), 352-357. London: Inter-Action Imprint.
Tilley, Nicholas. 1980. Popper, positivism and ethnometodology. British Journal of Sociology 31(1): 28-45.
Tomanović, Smiljka. 1995. Detinjstvo u Rakovici. Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta.
Vidich, Arthur J. 1954-1955. Participant observation and the collection and interpretation of data. American Journal of Sociology 60: 354-360.
Vučinić-Nešković, Vesna. 2013. Metodologija terenskog istraživanja u antropologiji. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.
Vučković Juroš, Tanja. 2011. Reporting on the Issues of Research Rigour and Ethics: The Case of Publications Using Qualitative Methods in the Croatian Social Science Jounals. Revija za sociologiju 41 (2): 161–184.
Ward, Barbara E. 1969. „Varieties of the Conscious Model: The Fishermen of Sout China“. In The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology, Michael Banton (ed). London, New York, Sydney, Toronto, Wellington: Tavistock Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
