Student Protest Banners as Analog Memes
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v21i2.5Mots-clés :
intertextuality, citability, banners, student protests 2024/25, content analysis, critical discourse analysisRésumé
During the 2024/25 student protests across Serbia, protest banners emerged as the dominant form of communication. In the age of digital media and social networks, Generation Z students unexpectedly chose (analog) banners as a communication tool that not only conveys political and social messages, but also incorporates elements of memes and viral culture. The aim of this paper is to examine the discursive features of banners characterized by social engagement, intertextuality, and humor. The features of mimetic media (multimodality, reappropriation, resonance, collectivism, and specific modes of dissemination) are interpreted through various forms of student protest banners as a medium for conveying protest messages. By applying content analysis, the key messages of the protests were identified, along with their thematic, linguistic and visual/formal classification. Forms of citationality were observed, as well as the interaction between digital and physical forms of communication, in which protest banners become a link between offline actions and online reactions, but also a specific symbiosis of different elements of art and popular culture. The results obtained were further examined from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, while the conclusions point to the specific potential of this form of communication as an example of the realization of intertextual relations which, in comparison with meme culture, are interpreted as part of a broader, metamodern paradigm.
Téléchargements
Références
Ajdžanović, Jelena, Strahinja Stepanov i Jasmina Dražić. 2025. „Semantičko-sintaksičke odlike i pragmatički potencijal studentskih političkih slogana tipa X Vs Y: ‘Ili ćemo promeniti državu, Ili ćemo promeniti državu’“. U Govoriti, razumeti, relovati: Vpogled u uporabno jezikoslovje, edited by Tatjana Balažic Bulc and Vojko Gorjanc, 179–96. Ljubljana, SI: Založba Univerze v Ljubljani. https://ebooks.uni-lj.si/ZalozbaUL/catalog/book/820/chapter/4391
Aristotel, 2008. Retorika. Podgorica: ITP Unireks.
Bagić, Krešimir. 2012. Rječnik stilskih figura. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2023. Internet mimovi između folklora i popularne kulture. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju.
Bahtin, Mihail. 1967. Problemi poetike Dostojevskog, prevela Milica Nikolić, Beograd: Nolit.
Barthes, Rolan. (1990). „Retorika slike“. Novi prolog 17/18, 58–65.
Bekar, Mira. 2015. „Space, language and power: The rhetoric of street protests“. Sociološki pregled 49(3): 337–348.
Blagojević, Marko. 2025. „Ko se smeje zlo ne misli: Politički humor kao metoda nenasilne akcije građanskih protesta u Srbiji“. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 19(33–34): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.18485/fpn_godisnjak.2025.19.33_34.4
Ćirković, Simo. 2016. Rečnik urbane svakodnevice. Beograd: HERAedu.
Čikić, Jovana i Ana Bilinović Rajačić. 2025. „Blokiram zato što... – Motivi studenata za učestvovanje u studentskom protestu u Srbiji 2024/2025. godine“. Političke perspektive 15(2): 7 – 30. https://doi.org/10.20901/pp.15.2.01
De Fazio, Debora e Pierluigi Ortolano. 2023. La lingua dei meme. Roma: Carocci.
Dragićević Šešić, Milena. 2001. „The street as political space: Walking as protest, graffiti, and the student carnivalization of Belgrade“. New Theatre Quarterly, 17(1), 74–86.
Đorđević, Jelena. 2009. Postkultura. Beograd: Clio.
Eco, Umberto. 1964. Apocalittici e integrati. Milano: Bompiani.
Fajgelj, Stanislav. 2004. Metode istraživanja ponašanja. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
Fisk, Džon. 2001. Popularna kultura. Beograd: Clio.
Frank, Russell. 2011. Newslore. Contemporary Folklore on the Internet. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Guiraud, Pierre. 1976. Les jeux de mots. P.U.F: Presses Universitaires de France.
Huckin, Thomas. 2002. „Critical Discourse Analysis and the Discourse of Condescension“. In Discourse Studies in Composition, edited by Elizabeth Barton and Gail Stygall, 155–176. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Ilić, Vladimira. 2025. „Protest ‘Bitnish’: Political Communication Through Banners at Student Protests in Serbia (2024 2025)“. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 20(2): 497–534. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v20i2.7
Jelačić Srbulj, Violeta. 2007. Retorička veština kroz retorske vežbe. Novi Sad: Artprint
Juvan, Marko. 2013. Intertekstualnost. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
Katnić Bakaršić, Marina. 2016. „Peruasivni diskursni žanrovi – političke parole i reklamni slogani“. Sarajevski filološki susreti: zbornik radova, vol. 1, 167–180.
Kalda, Mare and Lisi Laineste. 2004. „Be Like Bill: An Anatomy of an Internet Meme“. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica. DOI: 10.1556/022.2025.00005
Kiklewicz, Aleksander. 2022. „Pragmatic Aspects of Street Protests Discourse (on the Example of Protests in Belarus in 2020)“. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 2, 297–315.
Koprivica Lelićanin, Marija i Bojana Radenković Šošić. 2021. „Metamodernizam i jezik: reklama u doba pandemije“. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 16(4), 1101–1122. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.5
Koprivica Lelićanin, Marija. 2024. „Italianicity Is in the Eye of a Beholder: Analysis of Audience Reception to the Italian Tourist Campaign Italia. Open to Meraviglia“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 72(1): 201–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2401201K
Koprivica Lelićanin, Marija. 2025. Leggere i media. Teorie, metodi e pratiche. Torino: Utet.
Koprivica Lelićanin, Marija. 2025. „Kitsch Me If You Can: O digitalnom italijanstvu sa Umbertom Ekom“. Zbornik radova Fakulteta dramskih umetnosti 97–110. https://doi.org/10.18485/fdu_zr.2025.48.6
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kristeva, Julija. 1967. „Bahtin, le mot, le dialogue et le roman“. Critique 23, 438–465.
Milner, Ryan. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Oraić Tolić, Dubravka. 1990. Teorija citatnosti. Zagreb: Grafički zavod Hrvatske.
Popadić, Dragan, Zoran Pavlović i Iris Žeželj. 2018. Alatke istraživača: metodi i tehnike istraživanja u društvenim naukama. Beograd: Clio.
Prošić Dvornić, Mirjana. 1998. „The topsy turvy days were there again: Student and civil protest in Belgrade and Serbia, 1996/1997“. Anthropology of East Europe Review 16(1), 120–151.
Radenković Šošić, Bojana i Marija Koprivica Lelićanin. 2022. „Ironija i iskrenost u oglašavanju: reklame kompanije Taffo“. U Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru 10, uredile Snežana Gudurić, Jasmina Dražić i Mirjana Stefanović, 410–422. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
Radenković Šošić, Bojana. 2023. Italijanski jezik oglašavanja, Kragujevac: Filum.
Spaić, Bojan, ur. 2025. Protest je ispit. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Tomić, Đorđe. 2009. „ULIČNE STUDIJE – ODSEK: PROTEST! STUDENTSKI PROTESTI TOKOM ‘ERE MILOŠEVIĆ’“. U Društvo u pokretu: Novi društveni pokreti u Jugoslaviji od 1968. do danas, uredili Đorđe Tomić i Petar Atanacković, 188–237.
Van De Velde, Cécile. 2024. „The power of slogans: using protest writings in social movement research“. Social Movement Studies 23(5) 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022. 2084065
Vermeulen, Timotheus and Robin Van den Akker. 2010. „Notes on metamodernism“. Journal of aesthetics & culture 2(1), 5677.
Van Dijk, Teun. A. 2015. „Critical Discourse Analysis“. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis edited by Deborah Tannen, Heidi. E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118584194.ch22
Velikonja, Mitja. 2020. Politički grafiti: primeri iz postsocijalističkih država Balkana i Centralne Evrope. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Zvijer, Nemanja, Aleksandra Marković i Marija Radoman. 2025. „Svi u blokade! Analiza parola tokom studentskih blokada u Srbiji 2024/2025“. Sociologija 67(4): 589–613. https://doi.org/ 10.2298/SOC2504589Z
Zvijer, Nemanja, Marija Radoman, and Aleksandra Marković. 2025. „The Formal Features of Protest Slogans as an Element of Symbolic Struggle in Serbia’s Faculty Blockades (2024–2025)“. In New Divisions, Struggles and Solidarities in South East Europe: Book of Proceedings, International Scientific Conference, Belgrade, June 13–14, 2025. Belgrade: Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia. doi:10.5937/snds25004Z
Živković, Dragiša. 2001. Rečnik književnih termina. Beograd: Nolit.
Whitley, Bernard E., Mary E. Kite, and Heather L. Adams. 2012. Principles of Research in Behavioral Science. New York: Routledge.
Wodak, Ruth. 2004. „Critical discourse analysis“. Qualitative research practice 185, 185–204.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.


