Orthodox Memes between Digital Folklore and Propaganda: Identities, Ideologies and Lived Religiosity in Serbian Cyberspace

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v21i1.12

Keywords:

internet meme, digital folklore, lived religion, visual social semiotics, Orthodox memes

Abstract

This paper analyzes Orthodox internet memes as a contemporary form of digital folklore, preaching, and lived religion. Memes are examined as digital cultural artifacts that emerge within participatory online culture and function as a means of communication, identity negotiation, and the articulation of ideological positions. Special attention is given to religious memes as expressions of lay religiosity, as well as to their role as a space and medium for conflicts between ecclesiastical Orthodoxy, folk Orthodoxy, and critical attitudes toward religion and the Church. The memes were collected over a three-year period using a netnographic method, and the analysis employs visual social semiotics. Three types of Orthodox memes were identified: (1) retraditionalizing, dogmatic, and affirmative memes; (2) “folk” memes that humorously reflect elements of folk Orthodoxy and everyday religious practices; and (3) critical memes that problematize religion, ecclesiastical authorities, and the social role of religiosity. Particular attention is devoted to the analysis of the Orthodox Chad format as an example of an ideologically saturated memetic expression connected to broader global trends of right-wing populism, identity politics, and the crisis of masculinity. The paper concludes that Orthodox memes function not merely as entertaining content, but as significant semiotic and political resources through which religious and national identities are produced, normalized, and contested, making them an important source for understanding contemporary (digital) religiosity and cultural conflicts in Serbia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiello, Giorgia. 2006. “Theoretical Advances in Critical Visual Analysis: Perception, Ideology, Mythologies and Social Semiotics”. Journal of Visual Literacy 26(2): 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2006.11674635

Antonijević, Dragana. 2023. Antropologija folklora. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu i Dosije studio.

Antonijević, Dragana i Ana Banić Grubišić. 2021. „’Samo sapun Srbina spasava’– humorističke po(r)uke o higijeni tokom Kovid–19 pandemije u Srbiji”. Savremena srpska folkloristika 9, uredili Sikimić, Biljana, Branko Zlatković i Marija Dumnić Vilotijević, 397– 418. Beograd: Udruženje folklorista Srbije.

Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2023. Internet mimovi između folklora i popularne kulture. Beograd: Univerzitet, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju; Dosije studio.

Bauman, Richard. 1992. “Contextualization, Tradition, and the Dialogue of Genres: Icelandic Legends of the Kraftaskald”. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 125–146. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Baym, Nancy. 2010. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bellar, Wendi, Heidi Campbell, Kyong Cho, Andrea Terry, Ruth Tsuria, Aya Yadlin and Jordan Ziemer. 2014. “Reading Religion in Internet Memes”. Journal of Religion, Media & Digital Culture 2 (January). https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-90000031.

Burroughs, Benjamin, and Gavin Feller. 2015. “Religious Memetics: Institutional Authority in Digital/Lived Religion”. Journal of Communication Inquiry 39 (4): 357–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859915603096.

Campbell, Heidi (Ed.). 2013. Digital religion: Understanding religious practices in new media worlds. New York, NY: Routledge.

Campbell, Heidi. 2012. “Understanding the relationship between religious practice online and offline in a networked society”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80(1): 64–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1374200

Campbell, Heidi. Lane Joiner, and Samantha Lawrence. 2018. “Responding to the Meme-ing of the Religious Other”. Journal of Religion and Communication 14(2): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090787

Crawford, Blyth, Florence Keen and Guillermo Suarez-Tangil. 2021. “Memes, Radicalisation, and the Promotion of Violence on Chan Sites”. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 15 (1):982-91. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18121.

Čolović, Ivan. 2000. Politika simbola. Beograd: XX vek.

De Seta, Gabriele. 2020. “Digital Folklore”. In Second International Handbook of Intenet Research, Edited by Jeremy Hunsinger, Matthew M. Allen and Lisbeth Klastrup, 171-183. Springer

Denisova, Anastasia. 2019. “Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts”. Routledge Advances in Internationalizing Media Studies 25. New York: Routledge.

Donovan, Joan, Emily Dreyfuss and Brian Friedberg. 2022. Meme Wars : The Untold Story of the Online Battles Upending Democracy in America. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Elsner, Regina. 2025. “The Role of Orthodoxy in Ukraine’s Response to War: From Politics to Theology”. Canadian Slavonic Papers 67 (1–2): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2025.2500198

Fedun, Basil. 2025. Orthobros and orthobroxy : digital colonialization of Eastern Orthodoxy. Master thesis. University of Texas at Austin.

Gal, Noam, Limor Shifman, and Zohar Kampf. 2016. “‘It Gets Better’: Internet Memes and the Construction of Collective Identity”. New Media & Society 18 (8): 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784.

Gianolla, Cristiano, Lisete Mónico and Manuel João Cruz. 2024. “Emotion Narratives on the Political Culture of Radical Right Populist Parties in Portugal and Italy”. Politics and Governance, 12, Article 8556. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.85563

Hall, David D. 1997. Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hall, Stuart. 2001. “Encoding/decoding”. Media and cultural studies: Keyworks, 2. https://blog.richmond.edu/watchingthewire/files/2015/08/Encoding-Decoding.pdf,

Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press.

Jewitt, Carey and Rumiko Oyama. 2001. “Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach”. In Handbook of visual analysis, edited by T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, (134–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Jost, François. 2022. Est-ce que tu mèmes?. Paris: CNRS Editions.

Jovanov, Lazar. 2017. “Serbian Orthodoxy Between Traditional and Universal Values: Discourse Analysis of the Journal Orthodoxy”. Sociološki pregled 51 (1): 135-156. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg1701135J

Jovanović, Miloš. 2025. “Humor Against Hegemony: Irony, Satire аnd Parody Aimed аt The Serbian Orthodox Church“. The Sociological Annual (Годишњак за социологију) 21 (34): 71-95. https://doi.org/10.46630/gsoc.34.2025.05.

Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2003. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. 3rd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Кnobel, Michele and Colin Lankshear. 2007. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production”. In A New Literacies Sampler, edited by Knobel, M. and C. Lankshear, 199-227. New York: Peter Lang.

Kozinets, Robert. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: SAGE.

Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

McGuire, Meredith B. 2008. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mihăilescu, Michaela-Georgiana. 2024. “Never Mess With the “Memers”: How Meme Creators Are Redefining Contemporary Politics”. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241296256.

Milner, Ryan M. 2013a. “Media Lingua Franca: Fixity, Novelty, and Vernacular Creativity in Internet Memes”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research 3 (October).

Milner, Ryan. 2013b. “Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz”. The Fibreculture Journal 22.

Milner, Ryan. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Molina, Maria. 2020. “What makes an internet meme a meme? Six essential characteristics”. In Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media, edited by Sheree Josephson, James D. Kelly, Ken Smith, 380–394. New York: Routledge.

Monti, Nicollo. 2025. “The chad effect: Memes and masculinities”. Semiotica dei filtri: Eduted by Piluso Francesco P, Massimo Leone, 83–99. Gezano di Roma: Aracne

https://doi.org/10.53136/97912218180555

Nissenbaum, Asaf and Limor Shifman. 2017. “Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board”. New media & society 19(4): 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313

Papacharissi Zizi. 2002. “The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere”. New Media & Society, 4(1): 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244

Pavićević, Aleksandra. „Povratak religije”. Etnološko-antropološki pojmovnik srpske kulture. Pristupljeno 10.1. 2026. Link: https://pojmovnik.rs/pojmovnik/P/POVRATAK RELIGIJE

Phillips, Whitney and Ryan Milner. 2017. “Decoding memes: Barthes’ punctum, feminist standpoint theory, and the political significance of #YesAllWomen”. In Entertainment Values, 195– 211. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Postigo-Fuentes, Ana Yara. 2025. “Relational Humor and Identity Framing in the “Virgin vs. Chad” Meme Format”. Behavioral Sciences 15 (9): 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091251.

Radisavljević Ćiprazinović, Dragana. 2006. Religioznost i tradicija. Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja.

Shifman, Limor. 2013. “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker”. Journal of computer-mediated communication 18(3): 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013

Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Toelken, Barre. 1996. The Dynamics of Folklore. Revised and Expanded. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Topinka, Robert J. 2018. “Politically Incorrect Participatory Media: Racist Nationalism on r/ImGoingToHellForThis”. New Media & Society 20 (5): 2050–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712516.

Trifunović, Vesna. 2010. „Internet kao teren: primer sakupljanja folklorne građe”. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 58(1): 157-168.

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. “Semiotics and iconography”. In Handbook of visual analysis, edited by T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, 92–118. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wieneke, Marisa. 2024. Memes as Folklore: Toward a Method for Meme Analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Wiggins, Bradley and Bret Bowers. 2015. “Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape”. New media & society 17(11): 1886–1906.

Wiggins, Bradley E. 2019. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.

Žikić, Bojan. 2010. „Antropološko proučavanje popularne kulture”. Etnoantropološki problemi 5 (2): 17-39. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i2.1.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Petković, Dejan. 2026. “Orthodox Memes Between Digital Folklore and Propaganda: Identities, Ideologies and Lived Religiosity in Serbian Cyberspace”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 21 (1):309–332. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v21i1.12.