Humour and Antiquity in Film: Roman Scandals and Monty Python’s Life of Brian

Authors

  • Lada Stevanović Institute of Ethnography SASA, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.5

Keywords:

Roman Scandals, Life of Brian, antiquity, film, parody

Abstract

Antiquity appears in films from the very beginning of cinema. As in other examples of reception, the presence of antiquity depends on the context of reception, the specificity of the medium which includes the relationship with the audience, as well as the personal mark of the author. The subject of this paper are two movies set in antiquity: Roman Scandals (1933) and The Life of Brian (1977). Both films are comedies, the plots of which are set in the ancient past, and both are satirical, meaning that they have a contemporary social sting. Also, both comedies belong to the genre of swords and sandals (if we take this as an umbrella term for all films related to antiquity, and not only the epic sagas of the mid-1950s and 1960s), revealing a similar, parodic attitude to the mentioned genre. The film Roman Scandals, a musical comedy with elements of burlesque, is set both in contemporary America (the midwestern city of West Rome) and ancient Rome, constructing the complex process of identification and differentiation with ancient Rome. All this has to do with the remarkable usage of Rome in American culture and history, especially since the time when America started to break ties with Britain. This is explicitly marked in the scene of the exhibition in the Museum of Rome, which, as it is emphasized, belongs to the period of the Roman invasion of Britain. Humorous twists are numerous, being constructed in language, in problems of adaptations and dialogues between cultures, and in the parody of the genre and its motifs. The Life of Brian also parodies the genre of swords and sandals and its subgenre – biblical and Christian movies. Although both films are set in antiquity, the humorous procedures construct the satirical tone, which always bears a contemporary social sting. The anachronisms, and overlapping of history and contemporariness are constructed differently in those two films. However, they both raise, among other things, a question crucial for the research field of classical reception (to which this paper belongs), and that is the way in which antiquity is used in the invention of tradition (Hobsbawm). The paper also gives attention to the genre of parody, which already appeared in antiquity, continuing its existence through the Middle Ages, especially regarding the sacred texts and forms which, according to Bakhtin, all had their parodic version. In view of the fact that both films construct humour in numerous ways, the paper focuses particularly on the humorous procedures set in the context of antiquity, which among other things, raises the question of the attitude towards antiquity that these films pose.

References

Amadu, Kristina. 2019. Šta je antika? Prevela Jelena Loma. Loznica: Karpos.

Babić, Staša. 2008. Grci i drugi. Beograd: Clio.

Bakogianni, Anastasia. 2016. „What is so ‘classical’ about Classical Reception? Theories, Methodologies and Future Prospects“. Codex – Revista de Estudos Clássicos 4 (1): 96–113. DOI: 10.25187/codex.v4i1.3339

Bayless, Martha. 1999. Parody in the Middle Ages. The Latin Tradition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Bandić, I. Miloš. 1985. „Parodija“. Rečnik književnih termina, uredio D. Živković, 527-528. Beograd: Nolit.

Barthes, Roland. 1999. „Smrt autora“. Suvremene književne teorije, priredio i preveo M. Beker, 197-201. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

Bahtin, Mihail Mihajlovič. 1978. Stvaralaštvo Fransoa Rablea i narodna kultura srednjeg veka i renesanse. Preveli I. Šop, T. Vučković. Beograd: Nolit.

Berg, A Scott. 2013. Goldwin. A biography. London, New York, Toronto, New Delhi: Simon & Schuster.

Crossley, G. James. 2011. „The Life of Brian or Life of Jesus? Uses of Critical Biblical Scholarship and Non-orthodox Views of Jesus in Monty Python’s Life of Brian“. Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception 1, no. I: 93-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11157/rsrr1-1-10

Detienne, Marcel. 2007. The Greeks and Us. A Comparative Anthropology of Ancient Greeks. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fleming, Katie. 2006. „The Use and Abuse of Antiquity“. In Classics and the Uses of Reception, edited by Chalres Martindale and Richard F. Thomas, 127-137. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.

Fisk, Džon. 2001. Popularna kultura. Beograd: Clio.

Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2006. „Muzeologija u vakuumu“. Etnoantropološki problemi 1 (1): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v1i2.3

Handler, Richard. 1988. Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Hardwick, Lorna and Christopher Stray. 2011. „Introduction: Making Connections“. A Companion to Classical Receptions, edited by L. Hardwick and C. Stray, 1–11. Hong Kong: Wiley.

Hobsbom, Erik. 2011. „Uvod“. Izmišljanje tradicije, uredili ErikHobsbom i Rejndžer Terens, 9-26. Beograd: XX vek.

Hobsbom Erik & Rejndžer Terens. 2002. Izmišljanje tradicije. Prevele Slobodanka Glišić i Mladena Prelić. Beograd: XX vek.

Joshel, R. Sandra, Margaret Malmud and Maria Wyke. 2001. „Introduction“. Imperial Projections. Ancient Rome in Modern Popular Culture, edited by Sandra R. Joshel, Margaret Malmud and Donlad T. McGuire, Jr, 1-22. Baltimeor and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

Ludot-Vlasak Rnan. 2015. „Introduction: The Poetics and Politics of Antiquity in the Long Nineteenth Century“. Transatlantica, Revue d’etudes américanes. Anemrican Studies Journal 2: 1-5. http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/7830

Macdonald J. Sharon. 2003. „Museums, national, postnational and transcultural identities“. Museum and Society 1 (1): 1-16.

Malmud, Margaret. 2008. „Sword-and-Scandals“. Arethusa 41 (Winter): 157-183.

Malvi, Lora. 2012. „Vizuelno zadovoljstvo i narativni film“. Studije kulture, priredila Jelena Đorđević, prevela Ljiljana Marković, 387-409. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Maričić, Gordan, Ifigenija Radulović and JelenaTodorović. 2018 „Two radio dramas of Love, Hate and Revenge“, Istraživanja 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/i.2018.29.176-191

Rose, A. Margaret. 2014. „Parody“. Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, edited by Salvatore Attardo. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.

Routt, D. William D and Richard J Thompson. 1990. „’Keep Young and Beautiful’: Surplus and Subversion in Roman Scandals“. Journal of Film & Video 42 (1): 17-35.

Skoje, Matilde. 2016. „Antika na filmu“. Antičko nasleđe i njegova evropska recepcija, priredili Matilde Skoje i Jert Vestrhejm. Prevela Jelena Loma, 363-401. Loznica: Karpos.

Stevanović, Lada. 2019. „Crni humor na filmskom platnu: od narodne do popularne kulture“. Etnoantropološki problemi 14(4): 1187-1201. DOI https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i4.6

Stevanović, Lada. 2020. Antika i mi(t). Beograd, Loznica: EI SANU i Karpos.

The Pythons. 2003. The Pythons: Autobiography. London: Orion.

Winkler, M. Martin. 2001. „The Roman Empier in American Cinema after 1945“. Imperial Projections. Ancient Rome in Modern Popular Culture, edited by Sandra R. Joshel, Margaret Malmud and Donlad T. McGuire, Jr., 50-76. Baltimeor and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-10

How to Cite

Stevanović, Lada. 2021. “Humour and Antiquity in Film: Roman Scandals and Monty Python’s Life of Brian”. Etnoantropološki Problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 16 (1):135–154. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.5.