Depuis le corps physique jusqu’à l’incarnation dynamique: vers une étude anthropologique du mouvement corporel dans les sports de combat
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i4.8Mots-clés :
théories d’incarnation, incarnation dynamique, dualisme ontologique, habitus, mouvement corporelRésumé
L’objectif de ce travail est de trouver une approche théorique du corps, qui serait la plus appropriée pour une étude anthropologique du mouvement corporel dans les sports de combat. Le travail a été conçu de manière à suivre le développement du rapport de l’anthropologie envers le corps depuis la période formative jusqu’à nos jours, et cela est fait du point de vue du paradigme de l’« incarnation » comme d’une orientation théorique permettant une compréhension plus approfondie du lien entre les milieux culturels spécifiques dans lesquels se développent les sports de combat et de celui de la signification des mouvements mêmes du corps. La partie introductive présente un résumé bref des orientations théoriques « non incarnées », qui ont posé les bases pour la « révolution somatique », pour qu’ensuite l’attention soit consacrée à des auteurs qui ont le plus contribué à l'étude anthropologique de l’incarnation. Quatre perspectives théoriques concernant le corps ont été analysées: physique, socio-culturelle, incarnée, et la perspective de l’incarnation dynamique. Le travail se penche également sur la question du dépassement des abîmes ontologiques entre le corps et l’entendement, qui représentent l’héritage de la dichotomie cartésienne. Une attention particulière, à l’aide des exemples concrets, est consacrée à des perspectives d’incarnation et d’incarnation dynamique, ainsi qu’à leur potentiel d’application dans des recherches anthropologiques sur les pratiques corporelles de combat.
Téléchargements
Références
Ardener, Edwin. 1973. “‘Behavior’: A Social Anthropological Criticism”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society of Oxford 4 (3): 153-155.
Bar-On Cohen, Einat. 2006. “Kime and the Moving Body: Somatic Codes in Japanese Martial Arts”. Body and Society 12 (4): 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X06070885
Bates, Crispin. 1995. “Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: The Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry”. In The Concept of Race in South Asia, edited by Peter Robb, 3-35. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Benedict, Ruth. (1934) 1968. Patterns of Culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Benoist, Jean Marie. 1978. The Structural Revolution. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. (1775) 1973. The Anthropological Treatises. Boston: Haven.
“Dr. Paul Broca”. 1880. Science 1 (8): 93-93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2900242
Crossley, Nick. 2005. “Mapping Reflexive Body Techniques: On Body Modification and Maintenance”. Body and Society 11 (1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X05049848
Csordas, Thomas J. 1990. “Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology”. Ethos 18: 5-47. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010
Csordas, Thomas J. 2012. “Embodiment: Agency, Sexual Difference, and Illness”. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees, 137-156. Oxford, Malden, Mass.: Wiley‐Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340488
De Castro, Eduardo Vivieros. 1998. “Cosmological Deixis and Ameridian Perspectivism”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469-488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
Descola, Philippe. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.
Descartes, René. (1641) 1971. Discourse on Method and the Meditations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Douglas, Mary. (1966) 1978. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361832
Douglas, Mary. 1973. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426623
Douglas, Mary. (1992) 1994. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430866
Downey, Greg. 2005. “Educating the Eyes: Biocultural Anthropology and Physical Education”. Anthropology in Action: Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice 12 (2): 56-71. https://doi.org/10.3167/096720105793233922
Downey, Greg. 2012. “Balancing between Cultures: Equilibrium in Capoeira”. In The Encultured Brain: An Introduction to Neuroanthropology, edited by Daniel H. Lende and Greg Downey, 169-194. Boston: The MIT Press.
Street, Brian Vincent. 2021. “Sir Edward Burnett Tylor”. Encyclopedia Britannica, March 2021. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Edward-Burnett-Tylor
Farnell, Brenda. 1994. “Ethno-graphics and the Moving Body”. MAN 29 (4): 929-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033975
Farnell, Brenda. 1995. Do You See What I Mean? Plains Indian Sign Talk and the Embodiment of Action. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Farnell, Brenda. 1999. “Moving Being, Acting Selves”. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 341-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/223398
Farnell, Brenda. 2000. “Getting Out of the Habitus: An Alternative Model of Dynamically Embodied Social Action”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 397-418. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2661082
Farnell, Brenda. 2002. “Dynamic Embodiment in Assiniboine (Nakota) Storytelling”. Anthropological Linguistics 44 (1): 37-64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30028824
Farnell, Brenda and Charles Varela. 2008. The Second Somatic Revolution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3): 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00369.x
Farnell, Brenda. 2011. “Theorizing ‘the Body’ in Visual Culture”. In Visions of Culture: A History of Visual Anthropology, edited by Marcus Banks and Jay Ruby, 136-158. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frank, Аrthur W. 1990. “Bringing Bodies Back In: A Decade Review”. Theory, Culture and Society 7: 131-162.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. “Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison”. In On Violence: A Reader, edited by Bruce B. Lawrence and Aisha Karim, 444-471. New York: Vintage Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.34
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gibson, James J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gossett, Thomas F. (1963) 1997. Race: The History of an Idea in America. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hallowell, Alfred Irving. 1955. Culture and Experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Harré, Rom and E. H. Madden. 1975. Casual Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Totova, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield Pub.
Harré, Rom. 1978. “Powers”. In Dispositions, edited by Raimo Tuomela. Synthese Library. Monographs on Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, Philosophy of Science, Sociology of Science and of Knowledge, and on the Mathematical Methods of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 113. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1282-8_13
Harris, Marvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Harper.
Hatfield, Gary. 2018. “René Descartes”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/descartes/
Hertz, Robert. (1909) 1960. Death and the Right Hand, translated by R. Needham. London: Cohen and West.
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466025
Ingold, Tim. 2006. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-animating Thought”. Ethnos 71 (1): 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111
Ivanović, Zorica i Šarčević, Predrag. 2002. „O statusu tela u antropologiji“. Kultura 105-106: 9-24.
Jackson, Jean. 1994. “Cronic Pain and the Tension between the Body as Subject and Object”. In Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self, edited by Thomas J. Csordas, 201-228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langer, Susanne K. 1957. Problems in Art: Ten Philosophical Lectures. New York: Scribner.
Lyon, Margot. L. and Jack M. Barbalet. 1994. “Society’s Body: Emotion and the ‘Somatization’ of Social Theory”. In Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self, edited by Thomas J. Csordas, 48-66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1929. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. New York: Horace Liveright.
Manning, Peter K. and Horacio Fabrega. 1973. “The Experience of Self and Body: Health and Illness in the Chiapas Highlands”. In Phenomenological Sociology, edited by George Psathas, 59-73. New York: Wiley.
Mascia-Lees, Frances E. 2012. “Aesthetic Embodiment and Commodity Capitalism”. In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, edited by Frances E. Mascia‐Lees, 3-23. Oxford, Malden, Mass.: Wiley‐Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340488.ch1
Mauss, Mauss. 1936. “Les techniques du corps”. Journal de Psychologie, 32.3-4. Communication présentée à la Société de Psychologie le 17 mai 1934. http://dxdoi.org/doi:10.1522/cla.mam.tec
Mead, Margaret (ed). 1955. Cultural Patterns and Technical Change. New York: Mentor Books.
Mead, Margaret. (1928) 1961. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: Morrow.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714
Merlau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ophir, Hodel. 2016. “The Signature of the Moving Body: Agency and Embodied Education Ideologies of Dance Teachers”. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 47 (2): 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12148
Pettinen, Katja. 2012. “From Habits of Doing to Habits of Feeling: Skill Acquisition in Taijutsu Practice”. In The Encultured Brain: An Introduction to Neuroanthropolgy, edited by Daniel H. Lende and Greg Downey, 195-212. Boston: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9219.003.0010
Samimian-Darash, Limor. 2012. “Rebuilding the Body Through Violence and Control”. Ethnography 14 (1): 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112448026
Samudra, Jaida Kim. 2008. “Memory in Our Body: Thick Participation and the Translation of Kinesthetic Experience”. American Ethnologist 35 (4): 665–681. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27667518
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy and Margaret Lock. 1987. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1: 6-41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/648769
Srdić, Anđa. 2009. „Uticaj dalekoistočnih isceliteljsko-meditativnih tehnika na promenu predstava o telesnosti u Srbiji“. Magistarska teza. Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Synnott, Anthony and David Howes. 1992. “From Measurement to Meaning. Anthropologies of the Body”. Anthropos 87 (1-3): 147–166. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40462579
Varela, Charles R. 1994. “Harré and Merleau Ponty: Beyond the Absent Moving Body in Embodied Social Theory”. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 24 (2): 167-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00251.x
Varela, Charles R. and Rom Harré. 1996. “Conflicting Varieties of Realism: Causal Powers and the Problems of Social Structure”. Journal of Theory of Social Behavior 26 (3): 313-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00293.x
Varela, Charles R. 2003. Reaching for a Paradigm: Dynamic Embodiment. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12 (4): 125-131.
Williams, Drid. 1982. “Semasiology: A Semantic Anthropologists View of Human Movements and Actions”. In Semantic Anthropology, edited by David Parkin, 161-182. New York: Academic Press.
Williams, Drid. 1991. Ten Lectures on Theories of the Dance. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
Yang. Кatharine. 1994. “Whose Body? An Introduction to Bodylore”. The Journal of American Folklore 107 (423): 3-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/541069
Yuasa, Yasuo. 1993. The Body, Self-Cultivation and Ki-Energy, translated by Shigenori Nagatomo and Monte S. Hull. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Žikić, Bojan. 2014. „Dva tela ili jedno itd“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (4): 849-878. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i4.2
Žikić, Bojan. 2018. Antropologija tela. Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta i Dosije studio.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
