O mogućnostima naučnog objašnjenja zasnovanog na metodološkom individualizmu u antropologiji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i1.1Ključne reči:
metodološki individualizam, metodološki holizam, naučno objašnjenje, kognitivizam, akcijaApstrakt
Rad se bavi primenom metodološkog individualizma u antropologiji. U radu se preispituju kritike metodološkog individualizma koje ističu da ovaj pristup nije odgovarajući za antropologiju zbog specifičnosti te discipline. Autori polaze od toga da postoje prednosti ovog epistemološkog okvira za razumevanje fenomena kojima se bavi antropologija. Ispitivanje mogućnosti naučnog objašnjenja u okviru metodološkog individualizma stavlja se u relaciju sa suprotstavljenim epistemološkim okvirom metodološkog holizma. Druga pretpostavka autora je da antropologija nije isključivo holistička nauka, jer istorija antropološke teorije pokazuje da ova nauka ima tradiciju metodološkog individualizma. Rad prikazuje ključna dostignuća antropologa koji su svoje istraživačke i teorijske nalaze definisali primenom metodološkog individualizma. Takođe se ispituju alternativni oblici naučnog objašnjenja koji slede metodološki individualizam, u radovima savremenih antropologa (Holi, Štuhlik), kao i autora iz drugih oblasti koji slede isti metodološki postupak (Budon), a čiji zaključci su relevantni za antropologiju. Zaključak rada je da metodološki individualizam ima značajno mesto u antropologiji i da postoje područja ove discipline koja mogu imati heurističku korist od epistemoloških pristupa koji slede principe metodološkog individualizma.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Barth, Fredrik. 1959. Segmentary Opposition and the Theory of Games: A Study of Pathan Organization. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 89 (1): 5-21.
Barth, Fredrik. 1966. Models of Social Organisation. Occasional Paper 23. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
Barth, Fredrik. 2007. Overview: Sixty Years in Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 1-16.
Bell, Duran. 1995. On the Nature of Sharing: Beyond the Range of Methodological Individualism. Current Anthropology 36 (5): 826-830.
Boettke, Peter. 1998. Rational Choice and Human Agency in Economics and Sociology: Exploring the Weber-Austrian Connection. In: Merits and Limits of Markets, ed. H. Giersch. Berlin: Springer.
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2008. Napomena priređivača. U: Kliford Gerc, ur. Aleksandar Bošković, Kultura 118/119.
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2010. Kratak uvod u antropologiju. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
Bošković, Aleksandar. 2015. Ozbiljne igre: Teorija u antropologiji posle 1980-ih. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (1): 19-41.
Bošković, Aleksandar i Suzana Ignjatović. 2012. Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice. Ethnos 77 (2): 289-294.
Boudon, Raymond. 1998. Etudes sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, Raymond. 2001. Sociology that Really Matte., Inaugural Lecture. European Academy of Sociology, Swedish Cultural Center.
Boudon, Raymond. 2003a. Raison, bonnes, raisons. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, Raymond. 2003b. La conversion de Coleman à la théorie du choix rationnel: impressions et conjectures. Revue française de sociologie 44 (2): 389-398.
Boudon, Raymond. 2004. [2002] Théorie du choix rationnel ou individualisme méthodologique? Revue du MAUSS, 2 (24): 281-309.
Boudon, Raymond. 2009 [1977]. Effets pervers et ordre social. Paris: PUF.
Boudon, Raymond. 2011. Ordinary rationality: the core of analytical sociology. In: P. Demeulenaere (eds.) Analytical sociology and social mechanisms.Cambridge University Press.
Boudon, Raymond and François Bourricaud. 2003. A Critical Dictionary of Sociology. London: Routledge.
Bubandt, Nils, and Ton Otto. 2010. Anthropology and the predicaments of holism. In: (eds.), Experiments in Holism, eds. T. Otto and N. Bubandt. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bush, Paul D. 2008. Culture, values and institutions. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Davidson, Donald. 1963. Actions, Reasons, and Causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685-700.
Davis, John B. 2008. The conception of the socially embedded individual. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dirkem, Emile. 1963. [1895] Pravila sociološke metode. Beograd: Savremena škola.
Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on individualism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Durkheim, E. (1968) [1912] Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: PUF. URL: http://classiques.uqac.ca/
Đurić, Mihailo. 1964. Sociologija Maksa Vebera. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
Edling, Christofer and Peter Hedström. 2005. Analytical Sociology in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 15 (4): 511.
Elster, Jon. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Paris: Edition de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland and Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Hawkes, Kristen, et al. 1993. Hunter-gatherers: Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods. Current Anthropology 34 (4): 341-361.
Hedström, Peter and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. In: Peter Hedström, Richard Swedberg (ed.) Social Mechanisms.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2007. Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2): 211-26.
Holy Ladislav. 1976. Kin Groups: Structural Analysis and the Study of Behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 107-131.
Holy, Ladislav and Milan Stuchlik. 1983. Actions, Norms and Representations: Foundations of an anthropological inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ignjatović, Suzana. 2012. Komparacija primene teorije racionalnog izbora u sociologiji i antropologiji. U: Pomeraćemo granice, ur. Mirjana Rasević i Milan Marković. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.
Ignjatović, Suzana. 2015. „Eshatološka“ rasprava o budućnosti antropologije. Koncept krize antropologije u zborniku The End of Anthropology. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (1): 43-54.
Ignjatović, Suzana. 2016. Nasleđe Rejmona Budona. Sociologija 58 (1): 32-52.
Keyes, Charles. 2002. Weber and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 233-255.
Kincaid, Harold. 2014. Dead Ends and Live Issues in the Individualism-Holism Debate. In: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, eds. Julie Zahle, Finn Collin. Berlin: Springer.
Kulenović, Nina. 2014. Metodološki individualizam nasuprot metodološkom holizmu. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (2): 309-333.
Little, Daniel. 2014. Actor-Centered Sociology and the New Pragmatism. In: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, eds. Julie Zahle, Finn Collin. Berlin: Springer.
Lukes, Steven. (1968) Methodological Individualism Reconsidered. The British Journal of Sociology 19 (2): 119-129.
Mayhew, Anne. 2008. Institutions, culture and values. In: The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, eds. John Davis, Wilfred Dolfsma. Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar.
Nettle, Daniel. 1997. On the Status of Methodological Individualism. Current Anthropology 38(2): 283-286.
Ortner, Sherry. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126-166.
Parker, Wayne D. 2006. “Methodological individualism vs. methodological holism: neoclassicism, institutionalism and socionomic theory”. Paper presented at the joint annual congress of the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP) and the Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), Paris, France, July 5-8, 2006.
Peacock, James. 2004. The Anthropological Lens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poper, Karl. 1993. Otvoreno društvo i njegovi neprijatelji. Tom II, Beograd: BIGZ.
Rapport, Nigel. 1997. Transcendent Individual. London and New York: Routledge.
Rapport, Nigel, and Joanna Overing. 2000. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Samuels Warren. 1972. The Scope of Economics Historically Considered. Land. Economics 48 (3): 248-268.
Steel, Daniel. 2006. Methodological Individualism, Explanation, and Invariance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4): 440-463.
Stuchlik, Milan. 2014 [1977]. Goals and Behaviour. Historická sociologie 2/2014: 9-42.
Udehn, Lars, 2001. Methodological Individualism. London: Routledge.
Udehn, Lars. 2002. The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 479-507.
Udehn, Lars. 2003. The methodology of rational choice. In: The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, eds. Stephen Turner, Paul Roth. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Vargas, Eduardo Viana et al. 2008. The debate between Tarde and Durkheim. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2006: 761-777.
Veber, M. (1976) Privreda i društvo (tom 1). Beograd: Prosveta.
Watkins, J. W. N. 1955. Methodological Individualism: A Reply. Philosophy of Science 22 (1): 58-62.
Watkins, J. W. N. 1957. Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (30): 104-117.
Watkins, J. W. N. 1958. The Alleged Inadequacy of Methodological Individualism. The Journal of Philosophy 55 (9): 390-395.
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2009. Comments on Rational Choice and the Humanities. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities 1(1). http://occasion.stanford.edu/node/34
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2018 Suzana Ignjatović, Aleksandar Bošković
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
