Upotreba etnografskih analogija u arheološkom zaključivanju

Autori

  • Zorica Kuzmanović Odeljenje za arheologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v4i1.7

Ključne reči:

arheološka epistemologija, zaključivanje po analogiji, teorija srednjeg opsega, etnoarheologija, relaciona analogija

Apstrakt

Kao metodološki princip analogija je prisutna u svim naučnim disciplinama iako, s logičkog stanovišta, strogo posmatrano, ne zadovoljava kriterijume koji bi je okvalifikovali kao pouzdano sredstvo zaključivanja. Pitanje relevantnosti analoškog zaključivanja bilo je naročito važno za arheologiju koja je, težeći naučnoj objektivnosti, pokušavala da sazna kakva je bila prošlost.  Istorija tog akademskog stremljenja ka naučnom idealu razotkrila je, međutim, suštinsku nepouzdanost, logičku nedoslednost i najzad neobjektivnost svih arheoloških zaključaka o prošlosti, ukazavši na činjenicu da sve što saznajemo o prošlosti, saznajemo, ili bolje reći, interpretiramo po analogiji na sadašnjost.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Binford, L. 1977. General Introduction. In: For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling. L.R.Binford (ed.). New York. Academic Press.

Binford, L. 1978. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. New York. Academic Press.

Binford, L. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York. Academic Press.

Binford, L. 1983a. In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. New York. Academic Press.

Binford, L. 1983b. Working at Archaeology: The Late 1960s and Early 1970s. In: Working at Archaeology. L.R.Binford (ed.). New York. Academic Press.

Borčić, B. 1998. O metodu analogije. Nastava matematike XLIII/4: 1-6.

Cunningham, J. J. 2003. Transcending the „Obnoxious Spectator“: a case for processual pluralism in etnoarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22: 389-410.

David, N. and Kramer, C. 2001. Etnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Gibbon, G. 1989. Explanation in Archaeology. Oxford. Basil Blackwell.

Gould, R.A. 1977. Some Current Problems in Ethnoarchaeology. In: Experimental Archaeology. D. Ingersoll, J.E. Yellen and W. Macdonald (eds.). New York. Columbia University Press. 359-377.

Gould, R.A. 1980. Living Archaeology. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Gould, R.A. and Watson, P. J. 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 355-381.

Hodder, I. 1982. The Present Past, London. L.T.Batsford.

Kelly, J. H. and Hanen, M. P. 1990. Archaeology and The Metodology of Science, Albuqerque. University of New Mexico Press.

Kobylinski, Z. 1989. Ethno-archaeological cognition and cognitive ethno-archaeology. In: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression.I. Hodder (ed.). London. Routledge.

Koen, M. i Nejgel, E. 2004. Uvod u logiku i naučni metod. Beograd. JASEN.

Lucas, G. 2001. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork. London. Routledge.

Olsen, B. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Beograd. Geopoetika.

Primorac, Z. i Ule, A. 2006. Mjesto i uloga metafora i analogija u kompleksnom i pojmovnom mišljenju. Prolegomena Vol. 5 No. 1: 29-51.

Porčić, M. 2006. Etnoarheologija - sadašnjost kao ključ za prošlost. Етноантрополошки проблеми 1. св.2: 105-121.

Spencer, C. S.1992. Homology, Analogy, and Comparative Research in Archaeology. Behavior Science Research 26: 163-168.

Trigger, B.G. 1989 A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press .

Trigger, B.G. 1998. Sociocultural Evolution. Oxford. Blackwell.

Džonson, M. 2008. Arheološka teorija. Beograd. Clio.

Schiffer, M. B. 1988. The Structure of Archaeological theory. American Antiquity Vol. 53. No. 3: 461- 485.

Wylie, A. 1982. An analogy by any other name is just as analogical: a commentary on the Gould – Watson dialogue. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 382-401.

Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from Things. Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Los Angeles. University of California Press.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2009-06-18

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Naučni članci

Najčitanije od istog autora

1 2 > >>