Teren i javna arheologija (ili zašto je potrebno preispitivati i naizgled jasne veze?)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i3.3Ključne reči:
javna arheologija, arheološki teren, autoritet struke, narativi o prošlosti, SrbijaApstrakt
Javna arheologija, arheologija zajednice ili arheologija za javnost neki su od termina koji označavaju otvaranje arheologije i za ne-arheologe, višestruke načine na koje arheolozi dosežu do javnosti ili je uključuju u disciplinarnu praksu, s uverenjem da arheologija ne treba da deluje u izolaciji. Javnost se prvenstveno osposobljava i obučava društvenom značaju arheologije. Da li je tako i u Srbiji?
Arheolozi su u javnosti primarno vidljivi kao neko ko iskopava i otkriva prošlost. Bilo da javnost obaveštavamo, edukujemo ili uključujemo, bilo da radimo za javnost ili sa njom – ili se javnost sama bavi arheologijom – arheološki teren je za javnu arheologiju ne samo najprepoznatljivija i najpopularnija slika arheologije, nego nesumnjivo i osnovni prostor aktivnosti. U Srbiji, terenska iskopavanja se percipiraju bezmalo kao jedini način na koji arheolozi proizvode prošlost, a rukovodioci iskopavanja, učesnici u iskopavanjima ili tumači iskopavanja prepoznaju se kao verodostojni (i često jedini) glasnogovornici discipline. Autoritet se stiče kroz otkrića, a vidljivost kroz popularizaciju. Javna arheologija se uglavnom razume samo kao odnosi s javnošću, čak kao odnosi sa medijima. Neretko se poseže za senzacionalnim, jedinstvenim i zlatnim, ulazeći u sferu populizma, uglavnom da bi se obezbedila društvena i politička potpora sopstvenim projektima, (dalje) finansiranje i prestiž. Autorizovani narativi prošlosti i ponuđeno upakovano nasleđe mahom prilično korumpiraju sliku arheologije i doprinose pogrešnim razumevanjima prošlosti. U radu se predstavljaju primeri dobre i loše prakse, s namerom da se potreba za promovisanjem dopuni odgovornošću, a javna arheologija u Srbiji novim ciljevima.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Assmann, Aleida. 2008. „Transformations between History and Memory“. Social Research 75 (1): 49–72.
Asman, Alaida. 2018. Oblici zaborava. Beograd: XX vek.
Assmann, Jan. 1995. „Collective Memory and Cultural Identity“. New German Critique 65: 125–133.
Babić, Staša. 2001. „Janus on the bridge“. In Images of Rome: perceptions of ancient Rome in Europe and the United States in the modern age, edited by Richard Hingley, 309–322. Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series no. 44.
Babić, Staša. 2014a. „Afterword: When empires collapse“. In The Edges of the Roman World, edited by Marko A. Janković, Vladimir D. Mihajlović and Staša Babić, 252–256. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Babić, Staša. 2014b. „Zanat arheologa i dijalog sa javnošću“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 563–573. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i3.1
Babić, Staša. 2018. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti. Beograd: Clio.
Balaban, Radmila. 2018. „‘Izgubljeni u prevodu’ – uloga arheologije u društvenom kontekstu Srbije“. U Srpska arheologija između teorije i činjenica VI. Arheološko nasleđe. Knjiga apstrakta, uredili Zorica Kuzmanović i Marko A. Janković, 50–53. Filozofski fakultet: Beograd.
David W. Blight (2009). „Memory Boom: Why and Why Now?“. In Memory in Mind and Culture, edited by Pascal Boyer, 238–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crnobrnja, Adam N. 2017. „Arheološko nasleđe u Srbiji danas – briga države ili posao entuzijasta“. Moderna konzervacija 5: 77–96.
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2015a. „Dunavski limes u Srbiji: uloga muzeja u interpretaciji i promociji Granica Rimskog carstva“. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja 22(1): 365–385.
Cvjetićanin, Tatajana. 2015b. „Predmeti ili narativi. Arheološke postavke u Srbiji: doba artefakata“. Etnoantropološki problemi 10 (3): 557–593. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i3.2
Cvjetićanin, Tatjana. 2018. „Muzejska arheologija u Srbiji i mit o neutralnosti“. Etnoantropološki problemi 13 (3): 575–594. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i3.1
Ćosić, Natalija. 2016. „Autoritet i proizvodnja arheološkog znanja“. Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (3): 749–774. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i3.6
Faulkner, Neil (2000). „Archaeology from below“. Public Archaeology 1(1): 21–33.
Gavrilović, Eliana, Ivana Janković, Ivan Kručičanin, Marina Pejović i Ljubica Vinulović. 2017. Priručnik za muzejsku edukaciju. Beograd: Narodni muzej u Beogradu.
Claire Giraud-Labalte, Kate Pugh, Sneška Quaedvlieg-Mihailović, Joanna Sanetra-Szeliga, Brian Smith, Aziliz Vandesande, Clara Thys (eds). 2015. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Krakow: Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe Consortium by the International Cultural Centre (dostupno na: http://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope/outcomes/).
Glasnik SAD 30. 2015. Sesija „Uništavanje arheološke baštine u Srbiji“, održana na XXXVII skupu i godišnjoj skupštini Srpskog arheološkog društva u Kragujevcu, 14. oktobra 2014. Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva 30: 259–371.
Grima, Reuben. 2016. „But Isn’t All Archaeology ‘Public’ Archaeology?“ Public Archaeology 15 (1): 50–58.
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2007a. Archaeology is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Holtorf, Cornelius. 2007b. „Can You Hear Me at the Back? Archaeology, Communication and Society“. European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957108095982
Huyssen, Andreas. 2000. „Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia“. Public Culture 12 (1): 21–38.
Karl, Raimund. 2016. „Archaeological Responses to 5 Decades of Metal Detecting in Austria“. Open Archaeology 2 (1): 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0020
Kajda, Kornelia, Amala Marx, Holly Wright, Julian Richards, Arkadiusz Marciniak, Kai Salas Rossenbach, Michal Pawleta, Monique H. van den Dries, Krijn Boom, Maria Pia Guermandi, Felipe Criado-Boado, David Barreiro, Anita Synnestvedt, Kostantinos Kotsakis, Kostantinos Kasvikis, Eleftheria Theodoroudi, Friedrich Lüth, Mayssoun Issa and Isabelle Frase. 2017. „Archaeology, Heritage, and Social Value: Public Perspectives on European Archaeology“. European Journal of Archaeology 21 (1): 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2017.19
Korać, Miomir, Snežana Golubović, Nemanja Mrđić, Gordana Jeremić i Stefan Pop-Lazić. 2014. Roman Limes in Serbia / Rimski Limes u Srbiji. Beograd: Arheološki institut.
Kuzmanović, Zorica and Vladimir D. Mihajlović. 2015. „Roman Emperors and Identity Construction in Modern Serbia“. Identities 22(4): 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.969269
Matsuda, Akira. 2004. „The Concept of ‘the Public’ and the Aims of Public Archaeology“. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 15: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.5334/257
Matsuda, Akira. 2016. „A Consideration of Public Archaeology Theories“. Public Archaeology 15 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2016.1209377
Matsuda, Akira and Katsuyuki Okamura. 2011. Introduction to New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology, edited by Katsuyuki Okamura and Akira Matsuda, 1–18. London: Springer.
Merriman, Nick (ed). 2004. Public Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Milosavljević, Monika. 2011. „Arheologija nad moštima“. Antropologija 11 (2): 115–140.
Moshenska, Gabriel. 2009. „What is Public Archaeology?“ Present Pasts 1(1): 46–48. https://doi.org/10.5334/pp.7
Moshenska, Gabriel. 2017a. „Introduction: Public Archaeology as Practice and Scholarship Where Archaeology Meets the World“. In Key Concepts in Public Archaeology, edited by Gabriel Moshenska, 1–13. London: University College London Press.
Moshenska, Gabriel (ed). 2017b. Key Concepts in Public Archaeology. London: University College London Press.
Oldham, Mark. 2017. „Bridging the Gap: Classification, Theory and Practice in Public Archaeology“. Public Archaeology 16 (3–4): 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2017.1499398
Pruitt, Tara C. 2011. „Authority and the production of knowledge in archaeology“, Doctoral thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.15966
Ramos, Maria, and David Duganne (prepared by). 2000. Exploring Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Archaeology. Washington, D.C.: Reprot by Harris Interactive on the behalf of the Society for American Archaeology.
Richardson, Lorna-Jane and Jaime Almansa-Sánchez. 2015. „Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics“. World Archaeology 47 (2): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599
Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2008. Archaeology Matters. Action Archaeology in the Modern World. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Scarre, Chris and Goeffrey Scarre. 2006. Introduction to The Ethics of Archaeology. Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice, edited by Chris Scarre and Geoffrey Scarre, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schadla-Hall, Tim. 1999. „Editorial: Public Archaeology“. European Journal of Archaeology 2 (2): 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.147
Skeates, Robin, John Carman and Carol McDavid. 2012. „Introduction: questioning archaeology’s place in the world“. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology, edited by Robin Skeates, John Carman and Carol McDavid, 1–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meisels, Tamar. 2009. „‘Historical Rights’ to Land“. In Territorial Rights, edited by Tamar Meisles, 31–49. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9262-6_3
Marek, Tamm. 2013. „Beyond History and Memory: New Perspectives in Memory Studies History“. Compass 11 (6): 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12050
Vuković, Jasna i Vujović, Miroslav. 2014. „Od informacije do poruke: arheologija i mediji u Srbiji“. Etnoantropološki problemi 9 (3): 609–624. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v9i3.4
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2019 Tatjana Cvjetićanin
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
