« Alien » et narration dans l’anthropocène: évolutionnisme, créationnisme et pseudo-archéologie dans la science-fiction

Auteurs

  • Uroš Matić Austrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences
  • Sonja Žakula Institute of Ethnography, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i3.3

Mots-clés :

Alien, science-fiction, anthropocène, narration, évolutionnisme, créationnisme, pseudo-archéologie

Résumé

Ce travail analyse le changement du métarécit dans la franchise Alien (1979) lancé par le réalisateur Ridley Scott dans le film homonyme et suivie de la série de trois films réalisés par James Cameron (1986), David Fincher (1992) et Jean-Pierre Jeunet (1997). La franchise a été relancée en 2012 par le film Prometheus réalisé par Ridley Scott. L’intrigue des quatre premiers films est située à la fin de l’anthropocène et traite de l’horreur de la vie extraterrestre offrant l’approche évolutionniste au développement de la race humaine. Dans le monde où la planète Terre est « un trou de merde », comme le prétend un des protagonistes de la troisième suite du film Alien, les humains terraforment les autres corps célestes et colonisent l’univers. Pourtant, le renouveau de la franchise par le film Prometheus apporte le changement du métarécit qui passe de l’évolutionnisme au créationnisme et à la pseudo-archéologie aux motifs bibliques. Les humains cessent d’être les actants primaires et leur création et leur destruction sont attribuées aux ingénieurs extraterrestres. Ayant en vue l’idée proposée par Donna Haraway que la narration est essentielle pour la survie de la planète Terre, ce travail démontre le danger de la popularisation du créationnisme et de la pseudo-archéologie dans les récits de science-fiction, observée aussi dans les travaux récents de Ridley Scott (Raised by Wolves, 2020). Les humains ne sont pas les objets et ne peuvent pas être mis au même rang ontologique que les androïdes. La responsabilité pour la vie sur la planète Terre et dans l’univers, faute de preuve du contraire, reste collectivement entre les mains des humains et non pas entre celles des Autres extraterrestres. Le travail propose comme solution le changement du récit dans la science-fiction conformément aux connaissances contemporaines anthropologiques et archéologiques sur l’anthropocène et ses conséquences. La narration insistant sur la culpabilité collective mais aussi individuelle (individus; corporations) et sur la responsabilité pour le développement et pour les conséquences de l’anthropocène c’est la narration pour la survie de la planète Terre.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Ahrens, Jörn. 2007. „Imagologien des Ursprungs: Ridley Scotts Alien als Beispiel einer Mythologie der Mo-derne”. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 81: 440–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374638

Babić, Staša. 2019. „Arheološka stratigrafija, ravna ontologija i tanka deskripcija. Beleška o (in-ter)disciplinarnom dijalogu”. Etnoantropološki problemi 14 (3): 811–831. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v14i3.4

Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2013. „Kulturno nasleđe u postapokaliptičnim vizijama budućnosti”. Etno-antropološke sveske 21: 101–114.

Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2018. Filmovi na temu postapokalipse: antropološki ogledi. Beograd: Dosije studio.

Brace, Selina, Yoan Dikemann, Thomas J. Booth et al. 2019. „Ancient genomes indicate population replace-ment in early Neolithic Britain”. Nature ecology and evolution 3: 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559–019–0871–9

Chachkhiani, Ketevan et al. 2019. „Donna Haraway: Story Telling for Earthly Survival directed by Fabrizio Terranova. 2016. 90 minutes. $18.27 (DVD) and https://earthlysurvival.org“. Comparative Education Re-view 63 (3): 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1086/704138

Chapman, John. 1998. „The impact of modern invasions and migrations on archaeological explanation. A bio-graphical sketch of Marija Gimbutas“. In Excavating Women: A History of Women in European Archaeo-logy, edited by Margarita Díaz-Andreu and Marie Louise Stig Sørensen, 295–314. London and New York: Routledge.

Colebrook, Claire. 2019. „The Future in the Anthropocene: Extinction and the Imagination“. In Climate and Literature, edited by Adeline Johns-Putra, 263–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108505321.017

Creed, Barbara. 2005. Phallic Panic: Film, Horror and the Primal Uncanny. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Domanska, Ewa. 2014. „Archaeology of the Anthropocene. The New Age of the Anthropocene“. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1 (1): 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1.i1.73

Đorđević, Ivan. 2006. „Upotreba tradicjskih motiva u domaćoj naučno-fantastičnoj književnosti”. Glasnik Et-nografskog instituta SANU 54 (1): 101–111. doi: 0350–0861/2006/0350–08610654101D

Đorđević, Ivan. 2009. Antropologija naučne fantastike – tradicija u žanrovskoj književnosti. Beograd: Etno-grafski institut SANU.

Edgeworth, Matt. 2014. „Archaeology of the Anthropocene. Introduction“. Journal of Contemporary Archaeo-logy 1 (1): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1.i1.73

Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 1986. „Naučna fantastika mitologija tehnološkog društva”. Etnološke sveske (stara serija: 1978–1990) 7: 58–63.

Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2008. „Čitanje naučne fantastike i (kao) etnografije, ili obrnuto”. Antropologija 6 (6): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i4.11

Gavrilović, Ljiljana. 2011. Svi naši svetovi: o antropologiji, naučnoj fantastici i fantaziji. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.

Gimbutas, Marija. 1979. The Gods and Goddesses of Old Europe, 7000 to 3500 BC: Myths, Legends and Cult Images. London: Thames and Hudson.

Gimbutas, Marija. 1989. The Language of the Goddess: Unearthing the Hidden Symbols of Western Civilizati-on. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

Gilchrist, Roberta. 1999. Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. London and New York: Routledge.

Gorman, Alice. 2014. „Archaeology of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene in the Solar System“. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1, (1): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1.i1.73

Graves-Brown, Paul. 2014. „Archaeology of the Anthropocene. When was the Anthropocene? (and Why?)“. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1, (1): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1.i1.73

Haraway, Donna J. 1984. „Primatology Is Politics by Other Means.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984: 489–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1984.2.192523

Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Hurley, Kelly. 1995. „Reading Like an Alien: Posthuman Identity in Ridley Scott´s Alien and David Cronen-berg’s Rabid“. In Posthuman Bodies, edited by Judith M. Halberstam and Ira Livingston, 203–224. Bloo-mington and Indianapols: Indianapolis University Press.

Kelly, Jason. M. 2014. „Archaeology of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene and Transdisciplinarity“. Jour-nal of Contemporary Archaeology 1, (1): 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1.i1.73

Lane, Paul J. 2015. „Archaeology in the age of the Anthropocene. A critical assessment of its scope and socie-tal contributions“. Journal of Field Archaeology 40 (5): 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000022

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

Littau, Karin. 2011. „Media, mythology and morphogenesis: Aliens“. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354856510383360

Malinowsky, Bronislaw. 1954. Magic, Science and Religion and other essays. New York: Doubleday.

Marshall, Alan. 1995. „Development and imperialism in space“. Space Policy 11 (1): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265–9646(95)93233-B

Matić, Uroš. 2015. „Pyramids, dragons and whores: (Post)colonial myths and metafictions in “A Song of Ice and Fire” novels by G. R. R. Martin“. In Archaeology: Myths within and without, edited by Benjamin Hinson and Barbora Janulikova, 172–184. Cambridge: Archaeological Review from Cambridge.

Matić, Uroš. 2021. Violence and Gender in Ancient Egypt. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429340666

Matić, Uroš and Jensen Bo, eds. 2017. Archaeologies of Gender and Violence. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Musk, Elon. 2018. „Making Life Multi-Planetary“. New Space 6 (1): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2018.29013.emu

McKay, Christopher P. 2019. „Prerequisites to Human Activity on Mars: Scientific and Ethical Aspects“. Theology and Science 17 (3): 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1633060

Nielsen, Nicky. 2020. Egyptomaniacs. How We Became Obsessed with Ancient Egypt. South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Books.

Noonan, Boonie. 2015. Gender in Science Fiction Films, 1964–1979: A Critical Study. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.

Palavestra, Aleksandar. 2011. Kulturni konteksti arheologije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Peeters, Susan and Hub Zwart. 2020. „Neanderthals as familiar strangers and the human spark: How the ‘gol-den years’ of Neanderthal research reopen the question of human uniqueness“. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656–020–00327-w

Poarije, Žan. 1999. Istorija etnologije. Beograd: XX vek.

Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina C. 2011. „Thoughts in Circles: Kulturkreislehre as a Hidden Paradigm in Past and Present Archaeological Interpretations“. In Investigating Archaeological Cultures. Material Culture, Vari-ability, and Transmission, edited by Benjamin W. Roberts and Marc Vander Linden, 41–59. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1–4419–6970–5_3

Ribić, Vladimir. 2010. „Svemir kao američki imperijalni prostor“. U Naš svet, drugi svetovi. Antropologija, naučna fantastika i kulturni identiteti, uredio Bojan Žikić, 145–164. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar i Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.

Ripple, William J., Christoper Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome et al. (15,364 scientist signatories from 184 coun-tries). 2017. „World’s Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice“. BioScience 67 (12): 1026–1028.

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. 2000. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Stoermer, Eugene F. and Paul J. Crutzen. 2000. The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter 41: 17–18.

Tsing, Anna., Heather Swanson, Elaine Gan and Nils Bubandt, eds. 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet. Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Yanagisako, Sylvia and Carol Delaney. 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge.

Žakula, Sonja. 2012. „Da li kiborzi sanjaju biomehaničke ovce? Telo i hiperrealnost”. Antropologija 12 (2): 43–61.

Žakula, Sonja. 2013. „(Ne)razumeti Darvina: evolucija i konstrukcija granice između ljudi i životinja”. U Zbornik radova Etnografskog instituta SANU – Kulturna prožimanja: antropološke perspektive, uredio Srđan Radović, 31–48. Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU.

Žakula, Sonja. 2017. „Zoološki vrtovi u antropološkoj perspektivi”. Doktorska dis. Filozofski fakultet, Univer-zitet u Beogradu.

Žakula, Sonja. 2021. „Ljudsko-životinjski odnosi u žiži interesovanja:igra/studija slučaja u Srbiji”. Etnoantro-pološki problemi 16 (1): 105–133. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.4

Žikić, Bojan. 2010. „Antropološko proučavanje popularne kulture“. Etnoantropološki problemi 5 (2): 17–39. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i2.1

Žižek, Slavoj. 2004. Organs Without Bodies: Deleuze and Consequences. London and New York: Routledge.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2010. Living in the End Times. New York: Verso.

Internet Sources

Saltre, Frederik and Corey J.A. Bradshaw. 2019. „Are we really in a sixth mass extinction? Here’s the science“. Published November 2019.

https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-how-biodiversity-experts-recognise-that-we-re-midst-a-mass-extinction (23.8.2021.)

Drake, Nadia. 2015. „Will humans survive the sixth great extinction?“. Published June 2015.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/150623-sixth-extinction-kolbert-animals-conservation-science-world (23.8.2021.)

Filmography

Alien, 1979. Directed by Ridley Scott. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox & Brandywine productions. 1999. DVD

Aliens, 1986. Directed by James Cameron. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox, Brandywine productions & Pi-newood studios. 1999. DVD

Alien 3, 1992. Directed by David Fincher. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox & Brandywine productions. 2003. DVD

Babe, 1995. Directed by Chris Noonan. Sydney: Kennedy Miller productions and Universal pictures. 1997. DVD

Alien: Resurrection, 1997. Directed by Jean – Pierre Jeunet. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox & Brandywine productions. 2000. DVD

Babe: Pig in the City, 1998. Directed by George Miller. Sydney: Kennedy Miller productions. 1999. DVD

Prometheus, 2012. Directed by Ridley Scott. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox, Dune Entertainment, Scot Free Productions and Brandywine. 2012. DVD

Mad Max: Fury Road, 2015. Directed by George Miller. Los Angeles: Warner Bros., Village Roadshow Pictu-res, Kennedy Miller Mitchell production & RatPac – Dune Entertainment. 2015. DVD

Alien: Covenant, 2017. Directed by Ridley Scott. Los Angeles: 20th Century Fox, TSG Entertainment, Scott Free Productions & Brandywine. 2017. DVD

Raised by Wolves, 2020. Season 1, Episodes 1–10. September 3rd, HBO Max. Directed by Ridley Scott, Luke Scott, Sergio Mimica-Gezzan, Alex Gabassi and James Hawes, written by Aaron Guzikowski, Heather Bellson, Don Joh, Karen Campbell and Sinead Daly.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2021-11-16

Comment citer

Matić, Uroš, et Sonja Žakula. 2021. « « Alien » Et Narration Dans l’anthropocène: évolutionnisme, créationnisme Et Pseudo-archéologie Dans La Science-Fiction ». Problèmes d’ethnologie Et d’anthropologie 16 (3):677–698. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i3.3.

Articles les plus lus par le même auteur ou la même autrice

1 2 > >>