Sur la conception de la communauté académique dans les conditions des transformations contemporaines de l’institution de l’université
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v9i4.10Mots-clés :
culture académique, communauté académique, identité, réformes de l’université, administration et corps des enseignants-chercheursRésumé
Le concept de „culture académique“ est un objet de recherche injustement négligé dans l’anthropologie et les autres sciences sociales. Bien qu’en sociologie, on lui ait, au cours du XXe siècle, périodiquement accordé une attention théorique, la notion de culture académique reste, dans son acception largement adoptée, quelque chose qui paraît évident. Conçue généralement comme un ensemble statique et hautement formalisé des croyances et des comportements, la culture académique est rarement directement étudiée comme un processus dynamique exposé à des influences du monde non-académique ou „extérieur“. La conception de la „culture académique“ est analysée ici comme une catégorie variable et non-cohérente, et les processus d’identification des membres de „la communauté académique“ avec une „culture“ ainsi définie comme fluide et pluridimensionnelle. Le plus grand accent dans cet article est mis sur une sorte d’influence qu’exercent sur le fonctionnement de l’université et sa „culture“ les réformes actuelles de l’université et les systèmes de gestion nouveaux qui s’y développent. Ce genre de changement est directement lié à la transformation du rapport de l’extérieur et de celui intérieur envers le travail académique et par conséquent envers la „communauté académique“; nous estimons que certains de ces changements perçus dans les contextes académiques différents sont pertinents également pour une plus large intelligence des changements identitaires que sont en train de vivre aujourd’hui les membres des communautés académiques.
Téléchargements
Références
Apple, Michael W. 2005. Audit Cultures, Commodification, and Class and Race Strategies in Education. Policy Futures in Education 3 (4): 379-399.
Arimoto, Akira. 2010. The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan. European Review 18: 117-139.
Bok, Derek. 2005. Univerzitet na tržištu. Beograd: Clio.
Ball, Stephen J. 1990. "Management as moral technology: a luddite analysis". In Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge, S. J. Ball (ed), 153-166. London: Routledge.
Chomsky, Noam. 2014. How Higher Education Ought to Be: On Academic Labor. Edited transcript of remarks given by Noam Chomsky via Skype on 4 February 2014 to a gathering of members and allies of the Adjunct Faculty Association of the United Steelworkers in Pittsburgh, PA. Dostupno na: http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/28/on-academic-labor/.
Clark, Burton R. 1980. Academic Culture. Higher Education Research Group, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University. Dostupno na: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED187186.
Cohen, Michael D. and James G. March. 1974. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Dill, David D. 2012. "The Management of Academic Culture Revisted: Integrating Universities in an Enterpreneural Age". In Managing Reform in Universities: The Dynamics of Culture, Identity and Organisational Change, B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, and C. Sarrico (eds.), 222-237. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuko, Mišel. 1997. Nadzirati i kažnjavati. Nastanak zatvora. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Fuko, Mišel. 2010. Tehnologija sopstva. Polja LV (463): 70-87.
Gačanović, Ivana. 2009. Antropološke perspektive u/o kulturi revizije. Antropologija 8: 81-97.
Gačanović, Ivana. 2010. Problem globalnog rangiranja univerziteta ili o iskušenjima savremenih visokoobrazovnih sistema. Etnoantropološki problemi n.s. 5 (2): 185-204.
Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2011. The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters. Oxford University Press.
Grubor, Nebojša. 2008. Univerzitet – ideja u krizi. Analiza institucije polazeći od J. Habermasa. Theoria 4: 43-57.
Illich, Ivan. 1971. Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Jarić, Isidora i Martina Vukasović. 2009. Bolonjska reforma visokog školstva u Srbiji - mapiranje faktora niske efikasnosti studiranja. Filozofija i društvo 20 (2): 119-151.
Jaspers, Karl. 2003. Ideja univerziteta. Beograd: Plato.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2010. Antropologija između scijentizma i disolucije. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar; Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.
Kun, Tomas S. 1974. Struktura naučnih revolucija. Beograd: Nolit.
Kuper, Adam. 1999. Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
Laurence, Mike. 2009. Reconstituting the Political: Foucault and the Modern University. Ontario: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Dostupno na: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1450011.
Lolić, Marinko. 2009. Jaspersov pokušaj rehabilitacije ideje univerziteta. Filozofija i društvo 3: 41-59.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
Metzger, Walter P. 1978. Ac.ic Freedom and Scientific Freedom. Daedalus 107 (2): 3-114.
Neyland, Daniel and Steve Woolgar. 2002. Accountability in Action? The Case of a Database Purchasing Decision. British Journal of Sociology 53: 259–274.
O’Neill, Onora. 2002. Called to Account. Third 2002 Reith Lecture. London: BBC.
Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Power, Michael. 2003. Evaluating the Audit Explosion. Law & Policy 25 (3): 185-202.
Ramirez, Francisco O. 2006. "Growing Commonalities and Persistent Differences in Higher Education: Universities between Global Models and National Legacies." In The New Institutionalism in Education, H.D. Meyer and B. Rowan (eds.), 123-142. State University of New York Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1997/98. Does Academic Freedom have Philosophical Presuppositions? Beogradski krug 3-4 – 1-2: 38-46.
Rose, Nikolas. 1988. Calculable minds and manageable individuals. History of the Human Sciences 1 (2): 179-200.
Rose, Nikolas. 1991. Experts of the Soul. Psychologie und Geschichte 3 (1-2): 91-99.
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 1999. Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British Higher Education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 557-575.
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 2000. Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, M. Strathern (ed), 57-89. London: Routledge.
Silver, Harold. 2003. Does a University Have a Culture? Studies in Higher Education XXVIII: 157-69.
Simons, M. and J. Masschelein. 2007. "Only Love for the Truth Can Save Us: Truth-Telling at the (World)university?" In Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research, M. Peters and T. Besley (eds.), 139-61. New York: Peter Lang.
Slaughter, S. and P. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1997. ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review 5 (3): 305-321.
Strathern, Marylin (ed.) 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.
Strathern, Marylin. 2000a. "Accountability… and ethnography". In Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, M. Strathern (ed), 279-304, London and New York: Routledge.
Wilson, Logan. 1942. The Academic Man : A Study in the Sociology of a Profession. London, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Logan. 1979. American Academics: Then and Now. Oxford University Press.
Wedel, Janine R., Cris Shore, Gregory Feldman and Stacy Lathrop. 2005. Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600 (July): 30-51.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.


