Archaeology as Knowledge of Alternative Solutions: Athenian Democracy and its Neighbours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v17i3.6Keywords:
democracy, polis, chiefdom, heterarchy, archaeological knowledgeAbstract
From the early modern age, democracy has been regarded as one of the key social values, (meant to) secure equal representation of all the members of a community in political decision-making. The roots of this mode of social organization are explicitly linked to the ancient role-model, embodied in the Athenian constitution of the 5th century. The initial knowledge upon which the modern notions of ancient democracy are founded is derived almost exclusively from the preserved written sources. On the other hand, the considerations of the wider context in which the Athenian democracy emerged have often neglected the insights into the social ordering of the communities who simultaneously inhabited the European hinterland, encompassed by the term Iron Age. Archaeological knowledge of these communities, generated over the last couple of decades, indicates a variety of situations transcending the traditional interpretation based upon the concept of chiefdom. Situating the Athenian democracy in the context of various other social solutions, simultaneously realized in its hinterland, may elucidate the ways of its functioning, as well as the whole range of possible alternatives. Finally, such comparative approach may lead to a more detailed understanding of similarities and differences between the ancient model of democracy and the modern modes of organization denoted by the same term.
Downloads
References
Babić, Staša. 2002. „‘Princely Graves’ of the Central Balkans - Critical history of research“. Journal of European Archaeology V (1): 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.2002.5.1.70
Babić, Staša. 2004. Poglavarstvo i polis. Starije gvozdeno doba Centralnog Balkana i grčki svet (Chiefdom and Polis. Early Iron Age Central Balkans and the Greek World), Beograd: Balkanološki institut
Babić, Staša. 2008. Grci i Drugi. Antička percepcija i percepcija antike, Beograd: Klio
Babić, Staša. 2010. „Prošlost kao Drugi – Drugi kao prošlost“. Etnoantropološki problemi 5/2: 259 – 268. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i2.12
Babić, Staša. 2012. „Klasični uzori i kako ih steći. Prilog razmišljanju o ulozi klasične starine u obrazovanju“. Antropologija 12/2: 41–52
Babić, Staša. 2021. „The Status of Archaeological Knowledge in the Study of Status: Notes on Classical Greece“. In Consumption, Status, and Sustainability. Ecological and Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Paul Roscoe & Cindy Isenhour, 171–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Babić, Staša. 2022. „Reconsidering the “Princely Graves” of the Central Balkan Iron Age“. In Oxford Handbook of the Balkan Praehistory, edited by Michael Galaty, William Parkinson, Attila Gyucha. (u pripremi)
Babić, Staša i Zorica Kuzmanović. 2019. „Glasinac – Notes on Archaeological Terminology“. Godišnjak Centra za balkanološka ispitivanja ANUBIH/ Jahrbuch Zentrum für Balkanforschungen 48: 157–166.
Balot, Ryan K. & Larissa M. Atkinson. 2014. „Women and Slaves in Greek Democracy“. In Companion to Greek Democracy and Roman Republic, edited by Dean Hammer, 389–404. Oxford: Wiley-Blackell
Benjamin, Volter. 2017. „O pojmu istorije“. U Anđeo istorije, preveo i priredio Jovica Aćin, 151–166. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Brock, Roger & Stephen Hodkinson. 2002. „Introduction: Alternatives to the Democratic Polis“. In Alternatives to Athens. Varieties of Political Organization and Community in Ancient Greece, edited by Roger Brock and Stephen Hodkinson, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Cartledge, Paul. 2002. The Greeks. A Portrait of Self and Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Chapman, Robert. 2003. Archaeologies of Complexity. London, New York: Routledge
Collis, John & Raimund Karl. 2018. „Politics and power“. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age, edited by Colin Haselgrove, Katherine Rebay-Salisbury, Peter S. Wells, Oxford: Oxford University Press DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696826.013.11
Crumley, Carole L. 1995. „Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies“. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6 (1): l–5. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1995.6.1.1
Dougherty, Carol & Leslie Curke (eds) 2003. The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture. Contact, Conflict, Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Finley, Moses. 1985. Democracy Ancient and Modern. Rutgers University Press
Graeber, David. 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press
Graeber, David & David Wengrow. 2022. The Dawn of Everything. A New History of Humanity. London: Allen Lane
Hammer, Dean (ed.). 2014. Companion to Greek Democracy and Roman Republic. Oxford: Wiley-Blackell
Hansen, Mogens Herman. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demostenes. Oxford: Blackwell
Hartog, François. 2001. Memories of Odysseus. Frontier Tales from Ancient Greece. The University of Chicago Press
Konstan, David. 2014. „Reading the past (On Comparison)“. In Companion to Greek Democracy and Roman Republic, edited by Dean Hammer, 8–19. Oxford: Wiley-Blackell https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118878347.ch1
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2011. „Gordijev interpretativni čvor: rimski pisani izvori, ideja sociokulturne evolucije i koncept romanizacije“. Etnoantropološki problemi 6/3: 679–698. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v6i3.8
Mihajlović, Vladimir D. 2020. „Confusing Iron Ages: Communities of the middle Danube region between “tribal hierarchy” and heterarchy“. In Alternative Iron Ages. Social Theory from Archaeological Analysis, edited by Brais X. Currás & Ines Sastre 218–256. London, New York: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351012119
Milosavljević, Monika. 2022. „Uraaa, varvari! Kritičko preispitivanje (auto)varvarizacije materijalne kulture u srpskoj arheologiji XX veka“. Arhaika 9:35–55.
Morris, Ian. 1994. „Archaeologies of Greece“. In Classical Greece – Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies, edited by Ian Morris, 8–47. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press,
Morley, Neville. 2009. Antiquity and Modernity. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell
Nevett, Lisa C. (ed.). 2017. Theoretical Approaches to the Archaeology of Ancient Greece. Manipulating Material Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Nippel, Wilfried. 2015. Ancient and Modern Democracy. Cambridge University Press
Pluciennik, Mark. 2005. Social Evolution. London: Duckworth
Raaflaub, Kurt. 2014. „Why Greek Democracy? Its Emergence and Nature in Context“. In Companion to Greek Democracy and Roman Republic, edited by Dean Hammer, 23–43. Oxford: Wiley-Blackell https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118878347.ch2
Ransijer, Žak. 2017. Mržnja prema demokratiji. Loznica: Karpos
Ruprecht, Louis A. 1996. Afterwords. Hellenism, Modernism, and the Myth of Decadence. New York: State University of New York Press
Sastre, Inés & Brais X. Currás. 2020. „Introduction“. In Alternative Iron Ages. Social Theory from Archaeological Analysis, edited by Brais X. Currás & Inés Sastre, London, 1–5. New York: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351012119
Thurston, T. L. 2009. „Unity and Diversity in the European Iron Age: Out of the Mists, Some Clarity?“. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 17: 347–423.
Thurston, T. L. 2010. „Bitter Arrows and Generous Gifts: What Was a ‘King’ in the European Iron Age?“. In Pathways to power New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequality, edited by T. Douglas Price and Gary M. Feinman, 193–254. New York: Springer
Thurston, T. L. 2018. „Regions, groups, and identity: an intellectual history“. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Iron Age, edited by Colin Haselgrove, Katherine Rebay-Salisbury, Peter S. Wells. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696826.001.0001
Vasiljević, Vera. 2016. Senka Egipta, Beograd: Dosije studio
Vinkelman, Johan Joakim. 1996. Istorija drevne umetnosti, prevod D. Gojković. Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.