Ethical and Aesthetical in Collaborative and Participative Art Practices:  Lexicon Tânja Ostojić

Jasmina Čubrilo

doi:10.21301/eap.v13i2.12

Autori

Jasmina Čubrilo Odeljenje za istoriju umetnosti, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i2.12

Ključne reči:

participativne i kolaborativne umetničke prakse, umetnik kao etnogaf, zajednica/provizorna društvena grupa, etički kriterijum, estetički kriterijum

Apstrakt

U radu će se, na primeru projekta umetnice Tanje Ostojić pod nazivom Leksikon Tânja Ostojić započetog 2011. godine, analizirati izazovi, dvosmislenosti, kontradiktornosti interdisciplinarne prirode savremenih participativnih i kolaborativnih umetničkih praksi, teorijskih koncepata i paradigmi preko kojih i u okviru kojih se one prepoznaju i objašnjavaju. Participativni, odnosno kolaborativni umetnički radovi se gotovo po pravilu realizuju kroz različite neumetničke prakse, na granici političkog ili društvenog angažmana, često u odsustvu standardnih umetničkih postupaka, medija, materijala, izraza, čak i bez ikakvog vizuelnog karaktera. Generišu ih ili konstruišu različite situacije kao odgovori na specifične kontekste. Njihova, sada već konvencionalizovana struktura, pored umetnika podrazumeva uključivanje javne sfere i njenih subjekata, uspostavljanje bliskog odnosa s postojećom ili s novouspostavljenom društvenom grupom u određenom vremenskom periodu, a metod na koji se savremene participativne umetničke prakse oslanjaju svakako je saradnja. Treći ključni element participativnih i kolaborativnih praksi jeste društveni problem koji postaje „materijal“ za rad. Stoga, u ovom radu će se, na temelju interdisciplinarnog pristupa savremene istorije umetnosti i na osnovu aktuelnih debata u okviru studija savremene umetnosti, razmatrati funkcije i značenja umetnika i zajednice u kolabrativnim i participativnim umetničkim praksama.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Adorno, Theodor. 2002. Aesthetic Theory. London, New York: Continuum.

Benjamin, Valter. 1974. „Pisac kao proizvođač“. U Eseji, 95-113. Beograd: Nolit.

Bourriaud, Nicolas. 1998. Esthétique relationnelle. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

Bishop, Claire. 2014. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. OCTOBER 110: 51-79.

Bishop, Claire. 2006. The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents. Artforum: 178-183.

Charnley, Kim. 2011. Dissensus and the politics of collaborative practice. Art and the Public Sphere 1 (1): 37-53.

Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Clifford, James. 2000. „An Ethnographer in the Field, interview by Alex Coles“. In Site-Specificity: The Ethnographic Turn, ed. Alex Coles, 56-59. London: Black Dog Publishing Limited.

Downey, Anthony. 2009. An Ethics of Engagement Collaborative Art Practices and the Return of Ethnogapher. Third Text 23 (5): 593-603.

Foster, Hal. 1995. “The Artist as Ethnographer?” In The Traffic in Culture, Refiguring Art and Anthropology, ed. George E. Marcus, Fred R. Myers, 302-309. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

Gablik, Suzi. 1992. Connective Aesthetics: Art after Individualism. American Art 6 (2): 2–7.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.

Green, Renée. 2010. “L’artiste comme ethnographe?” In Une anthologie de la revue Texte zur Kunst de 1990 à 1998, éd. Catherine Chevalie & Andreas Fohr, 504-517. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.

Groys, Boris. 2002. “Art in the Age of Biopolitics: From Artwork to Art Documentation”. In Documenta 11_Platform 5: Exhibition, ed. Okwui Enwezor, 108-114. Kassel: Documenta und Museum Fridricianum.

Hjort, Larissa and Kristen Sharp. 2014. The art of ethnography: the aesthetics or ethics of participation. Visual Studies 29 (2): 128-135.

Kester, Grant. 1995. Aesthetic Evangelists: Conversion and Empowerment in Contemporary Community Art. Afterimage 22: 5-11.

Kester, Grant. 2005. “Conversational Pieces: The Role of Dialogue in Socially-Engaged Art” . In Theory in Contemporary Art since 1985, ed. Zoya Kocur & Simon Leung, 76-88. Malden, MA, Oxford, UK, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.

Kosuth, Joseph. 2008. „The Artist as Anthropologists“. In The Everyday: Documents of Contemporary Art, ed. Stephen Johnstone, 182-184. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kwon, Miwon. 2000. „Experience vs. Interpretation: Traces of Ethnography in the Works of Lan Tuazon and Nikki S. Lee“. In Site-Specificity: The Ethnographic Turn, ed. by Alex Coles, 74-91. London: Black Dog Publishing Limited.

Kwon, Miwon. 2002. One Place After Another, Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1992. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy Political. New York & London: Routledge.

Lind, Maria and Hito Steyerl. 2009. „Introduction“ to The Green Room. Reconsidering the Documentary and Contemporary Art #1, ed. Maria Lind and Hito Steyerl, 10-26. Berlin: Sternberg Press.

Martin, Stewart. 2007. Critique of Relational Aesthetics. Third Text 21 (4): 369-386.

Milenković, Miloš. 2007. Istorija postmoderne antropologije, teorija etnografije. Beograd: Srpski genealoški centar, Etnološka biblioteka; Odeljenje za etnologiju i kulturnu antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu. Dostupno na:

http://www.anthroserbia.org/Content/PDF/Publications/3_MilosMilenkovic_PoslePostmo

dernizma.pdf. (pristupljeno 1. februara 2018)

Möntiman, Nina. 2002. Kunst ald sozialer Raum: Andrea Fraser, Martha Rosler, Rikrit Tiravanija, Renée Green. Köln: Walther Konig Verlag.

Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. Citizenship and Political Identity. October 61: 28-32.

Osborne, Peter. 2012. Theorem 4: Autonomy, Can It be True of Art and Politics at the Same Time?, open! Platform for Art, Culture and the Public Domain 1-6, https://www.onlineopen.org/download.php?id=364 (pristupljeno 12. marta 2017.)

Rampley, Matthew. 2000. „Anthropology at the origins of Art History“. In Site-Specificity: The Ethnographic Turn, ed. Alex Coles, 138-163. London: Black Dog Publishing Limited.

Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics. London, New York: Continuum. Rancière, Jacques. 2013. Dissensus, On Politics and Aesthetics. London, New Delhi, New York, Sidney: Bloomsbury.

Ransijer, Žak. 2012. Sudbina slika. Podela čulnog. Beograd: Centar za medije i komunikacije.

Sheikh, Simon. 2008. „Talk Value: Cultural Industry and the Knowledge Economy“. In On Knowledge Production: A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art, ed. Marija Hlavajova, Jill Winder and Binna Choi, 182-197. Utrecht: BAK.

Siegenthaler, Fiona. 2016. Towards an ethnographic turn in contemporary art scholarship. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies 27 (6): 737-752.

Steyerl, Hito. 2009. „A Language of Practice“. In The Green Room. Reconsidering the Documentary and Contemporary Art #1, ed. Maria Lind and Hito Steyerl, 224-231. Berlin: Sternberg Press.

Verwoert, Jan. 2009. „Research and display. Transformations of the Documentary Practice in Recent Art“. In The Green Room. Reconsidering the Documentary and Contemporary Art #1, ed. Maria Lind and Hito Steyerl, 188-211. Berlin: Sternberg Press Green Room.

Young, Iris Marion. 1990. „The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference“. In Feminism/Postmodrenism, ed. Linda J. Nicholson, 300-323. New York: Routledge.

Izvori

http://www.van.at/see/tanja/

https://misplacedwomen.wordpress.com/

http://www.lepeuplequimanque.org/

http://www.msub.org.rs/izlozba-leksikon-tanja-ostojic-salon-msub

http://www.leksikon-yu-mitologije.net/leksikon/