Everyday Misanthropy: Attitudes towards Owning a Dog as a Pet in Today's Serbia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i2.5

Keywords:

misanthropy, anthropology, the relationship between humans and animals, pets – dogs, contemporary Serbia

Abstract

Although the general thematic framework of this text is the relationship between humans and animals, the comments and testimonies about dogs presented in this text are, in fact, comments and testimonies about humans. Dog behavior represents a framework and an occasion for dealing with human behavior by commentators and respondents. It aims to highlight the inaction of what is being commented on or what is being said, whether it is seen through the perspective of people who own dogs, or that of people who do not and who consider the current practice of keeping them excessive. Not all comments and statements are unambiguously formulated according to the "for" and "against" principle of a given practice, but in spite of that, most of them have a clear value orientation in favor or against it. The commentators and respondents’ tendency to present their point of view as unbiased is the starting point of their discursive confrontation with the opinions and behaviors that they do not like. The final part of the procedure is the evaluation of other people in a way that it equates them with their attitudes: people are assessed based on the evaluation of how well their opinion aligns with the part of the worldview related to the specific topic being commented on by those who are evaluating. The purpose of the evaluation is to establish one's own statement about what the sociocultural normative should look like in terms of what is being commented on. The evaluation is based on personal views and experiences related to the behavior of the actors in the given practice – dogs and their owners – with the notion of what is culturally normal in this regard. The notion of cultural normality is based on what is perceived as common everyday interaction among people, guided by the idea of sociability, as well as on the knowledge of the legal regulations of the given area. The idea of the commentators and respondents is that it is possible to establish an ideal image of the behavior of dog owners, their pets, and the people they interact with in public in sociocultural everyday life. Respecting mutual needs in terms of using shared physical space, as well as maintaining hygiene in it, having a positive affective attitude towards both dogs and people, not disturbing others in any way, including unprovoked judgment, are the basic elements of this ideal image – regardless of the perspective from which it is viewed. Deviation from this in specific actions – whether it is not collecting feces after a dog's defecation, mocking dog owners for any reason, or anything else – is considered non-committal. Misanthropic attitudes, therefore, arise in the expected form of disdain for such behavior, or at least pointing out human mistakes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boghrati, Reihane, Jonah Berger. 2023. “Quantifying cultural change: Gender bias in music“. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 152 (9): 2591-2602. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001412

Candea, Matei. 2010. “’I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: Engagement and detachment in human–animal relations”. American Ethnologist 37 (2): 241–258. DOI:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01253.х

Carey, Matthew. 2017. Mistrust. An Ethnographic Theory. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.

Cochrane, Alasdair. 2012. Animal Rights without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Çavuş Alan, Seda, Abdullah Özen, Nurhan Halisdemir. 2023. “Development and validation of a scale for measuring pet owners’ loyalty to their pet”. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 47 (1): 26-33. DOI:10.55730/1300-0128.4265

Charmaraman, Linda, Elizabeth Kiel, Amanda M. Richer, Alyssa Gramajo and Megan K. Mueller. 2022. “Associations between Pet Care Responsibility, Companion Animal Interactions, and Family Relationships during COVID-19”. Animals 12: 3274. DOI:10.3390/ani12233274

Cohen-Vrignaud, Simon Reader. 2024. “The Importance of Being Bitchy”. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies 30 (2): 157-180. DOI: 10.1215/10642684-11028990

Cooper, David E. 2018. Animals and Misanthropy. London: Routledge.

De Freitas, Julian, Hagop Sarkissian, George E. Newman, Igor Grossmann, Felipe De Brigard, Andres Luco, Joshua Knobe. 2018. “Consistent Belief in a Good True Self in Misanthropes and Three Interdependent Cultures”. Cognitive Science 42 (Suppl. 1): 134–160. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12505

De Proost, Michiel, Nicky Hudson,Veerle Provoost. 2021. „‘Nothing will stop me from giving the gift of life’: a qualitative analysis of egg donor forum posts”. Culture, Health & Sexuality 23 (5): 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1722242

Doré, Antoine, Jérôme Michalon, Teresa Líbano Monteiro. 2019. “Place et incidence des animaux dans les familles”. Enfances Familles Générations 32: 1-28. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1064505ar

Duarte Cardoso, Sandra, Yasemin Salgirli Demirbas, Ceres Berger Faraco, Liliana de Sousa, Gonçalo da Graça Pereira. 2021. „Non-human animal theories: from mechanism to abolitionism“. Journal of the Turkish Veterinary Medical Society 92 (1): 76-82. DOI: 10.33188/vetheder.705992.

Eason, Fenella. 2020. Human–Canine Collaboration in Care: Doing Diabetes. London: Routledge.

Farnworth, Mark J. 2018. “Pets”. In Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, eds Jennifer Vonk and Todd Shackelford, 5190-5201. Berlin/ New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

Forrest, Rachel, Leena Awawdeh, Maria Pearson and Natalie Waran. 2023. “Pet Ownership in Aotearoa New Zealand: A National Survey of Cat and Dog Owner Practices”. Animals 13: 631. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ani13040631

Fuentes, Agustin. 2006. “The Humanity of Animals and the Animality of Humans: A View from Biological Anthropology Inspired by J. M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello”. American Anthropologist 108 (1): 124–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804738

Gorunović, Gordana. 2023. “Antropološka analiza video-narativa o makaki majmunima na Youtube кanalima: kada se divlje životinje pretvore u ‘kućne ljubimce’“. U Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa “Društvo i politika” Izazovi digitalne transformacije: između svakodnevie i transhumanizma, 139-153. Banja Luka: Univerzitet političkih nauka.

Hamlett, Jane, Julie-Marie Strange. 2023. Pet Revolution: Animals and the Making of Modern British Life. London: Reaktion Books.

Harris, Joseph. 2022. Misanthropy in the Age of Reason: Hating Humanity from Shakespeare to Schiller. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Harris, Marvin. 1976. "History and Significance of the Emic/Etic Distinction". Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 329–350. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553

Harris, Marvin. 1980. Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York: Random House.

Ingold, Tim. 1988 “Introduction”. To What is an animal? edited by Tim Ingold, 1-16. London: Routledge.

Irvine, Leslie, Cilia Laurent. 2017. “More‐than‐human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households”. Sociology Compass 11 (2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12455

Jackson, Michael. 1990 “The Man Who Could Turn Into an Elephant: Shape-shifting among the Kuranko of Sierra Leone”. In Personhood and Agency: The Experience of Self and Others in African Cultures, Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology 14, edited by Michael Jackson and Ivan Karp, 59-78. Stockholm/ Washington, DC: Almquist and Wiksell/ Smithsonian Institution Press.

Jolly, Helina, Terre Satterfield, Milind Kandlikar, Suma TR. 2022. “Indigenous insights on human–wildlife coexistence in southern India”. Conservation Biology. 36: e13981. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13981

Jovanovic, Verica, Marija Milic, Jelena Dotlic, Smiljana Cvjetkovic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Natasa Maksimovic, Maja Sekulic, Tatjana Gazibara. 2023. “Mandatory and seasonal vaccination against COVID-19: Attitudes of the vaccinated people in Serbia”. Epidemiology and Infection 151: e83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823000614.

Khare, R. S. 1992. “The Other's Double. The Anthropologist's Bracketed Self: Notes on Cultural Representation and Privileged Discourse”. New Literary History 23 (1): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/469155.

Kidd, Ian James. 2020. “Animals, Misanthropy and Humanity”. Journal of Animal Ethics 10 (6): 66-72. DOI: 10.5406/janimalethics.10.1.0066.

Kidd, Ian James. 2023. “From Vices to Corruption to Misanthropy”. TheoLogica 7 (2): 138-160. https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v7i2.66863

Kovačević, Ivan. 2001. Semiologija mita i rituala I. Tradicija. Beograd. Srpski genealoški centar.

Leach, Edmund. 1982. Social Anthropology. Glasgow: Fontana.

Leach, Edmund. 1988. “Antropološki aspekti jezika. Kategorije životinja i jezično nasilje”. Quorum 2: 83-106.

Linder, Erich, Herwig Grimm. 2023. “What Is Wrong with Eating Pets? Wittgensteinian Animal Ethics and Its Need for Empirical Data”. Animals 13: 2747. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ani13172747

Melgar, Natalia, Maximo Rossi, Tom W. Smith. 2013. “Individual Attitudes Toward Others, Misanthropy Analysis in a Cross-Country Perspective”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 72 (1): 222-241.

Morson, Gary Saul. 1996. “Misanthropology”. New Literary History 27 (1): 57-72.

Mosse, David. 2006. “Anti-social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities”. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12 (4): 935-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00371.x.

Nabono Martins, Juliana. 2023. “Homophobia in Brazilian football: A critical discourse analysis of fans’ comments in online football forums”. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 58 (2): 392–410. DOI: 10.1177/10126902221107323

Nadasdy, Paul. 2007. “The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human–animal sociality”. American Ethnologist 34 (1) 25–43. DOI: 10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.25

Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, Rubia R. Valente. 2022. “Misanthropolis: Do cities promote misanthropy?” Cities 131: 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103945

Peterson, Helen, Kristina Engwall. 2019. “'Why Would You Want a Baby When You Could Have a Dog?'” Voluntarily Childless Women’s 'Peternal' Feelings, Longing and Ambivalence“. Social Sciences 8: 126. doi:10.3390/socsci8040126

Rand, Jacquie, Zohre Ahmadabadi, Jade Norris and Michael Franklin. 2023. “Attitudes and Beliefs of a Sample of Australian Dog and Cat Owners towards Pet Confinement”. Animals 13: 1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ani13061067

Redmalm, David. 2019. “To make pets live, and to let them die: The biopolitics of pet keeping”. In Death Matters: Cultural Sociology of Mortal Life, edited by Tora Holmberg, Annika Jonsson, and Fredrik Palm, 241-263. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11485-5_12.

Rock, Melanie, Chris Degeling. 2013. “Public Health Ethics and a Status for Pets as Person-Things Revisiting the Place of Animals in Urbanized Societies”. Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):485–495. DOI 10.1007/s11673-013-9478-z

Ryder, Richard D. 2004. “Speciesism revisited”. Think 2 (6): 83-92. DOI: 10.1017/s1477175600002840

Saunders, Jessica. 2017. „Layla Parast , Susan H. Babey, Jeremy V. Miles, Exploring the differences between pet and non-pet owners: Implications for human-animal interaction research and policy“. PLoS ONE 12: e0179494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179494.

Seaboch, Melissa S., Sydney N. Cahoon. 2021. “Pet primates for sale in the United States”. PLoS ONE 16 (9): e0256552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0256552

Shepherd, Allison J. 2008. “Results of the 2006 AVMA survey of companion animal ownership in US pet-owning households”. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 232 (5):695–696. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.232.5.695

Sik, Domonkos. 2021. “From Lay Depression Narratives to Secular Ritual Healing: An Online Ethnography of Mental Health Forums”. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 45 (4): 751–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09702-5

Solhjoo, Niloofar, Maja Krtalić, Anne Goulding. 2022. “Pets and people: information experience of multispecies families”. Journal of Documentation 78 (5): 1092-1108. DOI 10.1108/JD-03-2021-0052

Stajić, Mladen, Bojan Žikić, Marko Pišev. 2021. „Šumovi u komunikaciji: „dvostruka obavezanost“ tokom epidemije kovida 19 u Srbiji“. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 69 (3): 593-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2103593S

Steinmetz, Kevin F. 2012. “Message Received: Virtual Ethnography in Online Message Boards”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11 (1): 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100103

Svoboda, Toby. 2022. A Philosophical Defense of Misanthropy. New York: Routledge.

Thrift, Nigel. 2005. “But malice aforethought: cities and the natural history of hatred”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (2): 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00157.x

Tourigny, Eric 2020. “Do all dogs go to heaven? Tracking human-animal relationships through the archaeological survey of pet cemeteries”. Antiquity 94 (378): 1614–1629. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.191

Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1984. Dominance & Affection. The Making of Pets. New Haven, CT and London, UK: Yale University Press.

Turska, Julia J. David Ludwig. 2023. “Back by popular demand, ontology. Productive tensions between anthropological and philosophical approaches to ontology”. Synthese 202: 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04243-x

Vučinić Nešković, Vesna. 2013. Metodologija terenskog istraživanja u antropologiji. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet i Srpski genealoški centar.

Valentе, Rubia R, Ryan A. Smith. 2022. „Religiosity and Misanthropy across the Racial and Ethnic Divide”. Religions 14: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rel14030393

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere. Four lectures given in the Department of Social Anthropology, Cambridge University, February–March 1998, HAU Masterclass Series Volume 1. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.

Walsh, Froma. 2009a. “Human-Animal Bonds I: The Relational Significance of Companion Animals”. Family Process 48 (4): 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x

Walsh, Froma. 2009b. “Human-Animal Bonds II: The Role of Pets in Family Systems and Family Therapy”. Family Process 48 (44): 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x

Weir, Lorna. 2008. “The Concept of Truth Regime”. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 33 (2): 367-389. https://www.jstor.org/stable/canajsocicahican.33.2.367

Wilson, Richard A. 2004. “The Trouble with Truth: Anthropology's Epistemological Hypochondria”. Anthropology Today 20 (5): 14-17.

Wilson Samuel M, Leighton C. Peterson. 2002. “The Anthropology of Online Communities”. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 449-467. doi: 10.n46/annurev.anthro.3l.040402.085436

Yvinec, Cédric. 2014. “Temporal dimensions of selfhood: theories of person among the Suruí of Rondônia (Brazilian Amazon)”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 20 (1): 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12077

Zlatović, Anja. 2022. “Vremenski process smrti na internetu”. Antropologija 22 (1): 9-34.

Žakula, Sonja. 2013. “Narativizacija jednog događaja u Beogradskom zoološkom vrtu: semiotička analiza priče o keruši Gabi i jaguaru, Etnoantropološki problemi 8 (4): 1047-1069. https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.v8i4.8

Žakula, Sonja. 2021. “Ljudsko-životinjski odnosi u žiži interesovanja: igra/studija slučaja u Srbiji”. Etnoantropološki problemi 16 (1): 105-133. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.4

Žakula, Sonja. 2023. “The city as multispecies space: Dog walking in downtown Belgrade during the COVID-19 lockdown”. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 71 (2) 97-112. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2302097Z

Žakula, Sonja, Ivana Živaljević. 2018. “Izučavanje ljudsko – životinjskih odnosa u antropologiji i arheologiji I”. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 66 (2); 255-270, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z

Žakula, Sonja, Ivana Živaljević. 2019. “Izučavanje ljudsko – životinjskih odnosa u antropologiji i arheologiji II”. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU 67 (1); 155-174, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901153Z

Žikić, Bojan. 2015. "What Makes People Good or Bad? (Mis)Anthropological Essay on Searching for Social/Cultural Reasons on Judging the Other People." Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (4): 927–943, https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v10i4.8

Žikić, Bojan. 2016. "Why Do We Need Misanthropology in Anthropology? An Exploratory Essay in Deliberating the Research Subfield." Etnoantropološki problemi 11 (4): 967–988, https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v11i4.1

Žikić, Bojan. 2018. Antropologija tela. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet i Dosije studio.

Žikić, Bojan. 2021. „Kognitivna i medicinska mizantropologija: korona-žurke i kolo kod spomenika“. Etnoantropološki problemi 16 (2): 391–420, https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i2.4

Žikić, Bojan. 2023. Rizik i poricanje. Antropološko proučavanje kovida-19 u Srbiji 2020-2022. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet i Dosije studio.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Žikić, Bojan. 2024. “Everyday Misanthropy: Attitudes towards Owning a Dog As a Pet in Today’s Serbia”. Etnoantropološki Problemi Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 19 (2):427–457. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i2.5.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>