Problem globalnog rangiranja univerziteta ili o iskušenjima savremenih visokoobrazovnih sistema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v5i2.9Ključne reči:
globalizacija, rangiranje univerziteta, antropologija nauke, antropologija obrazovanja, kvalitet i kvantitetApstrakt
U radu je razmotreno sve popularnije globalno rangiranje univerziteta i njegov uticaj na promenu same ideje univerzitetâ i njihovih društvenih i kulturnih uloga. Jedna od suštinskih posledica ove pojave jeste sve veća potreba da se svojstva, odlike i rezultati upoređuju na globalnom nivou. Sam proces upoređivanja najčešće podrazumeva redukovanje pojava na što manji broj njihovih karakteristika, i ako je moguće, što merljivijih. Sve popularnija, i u političkom smislu sve relevantnija globalna rangiranja univerziteta predstavljaju jedan od pojavnih oblika datog fenomena. U ovom radu sam, dakle, pokušala da ukažem na važnost i kompleksnost implikacija ovog fenomena na opštu ideju visokog obrazovanja, od kojih je jedna od najuočljivijih ta da univerziteti danas podležu svojevrsnoj manipulaciji koja je u funkciji kontrole, efikasnosti, iskoristivosti i drugih pragmatičnih faktora koji nisu u suštinskoj vezi sa kvalitetom visokog obrazovanja u njegovom izvornom značenju.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Cooper, Paul. 2004. The gift of education: an anthropological perspective on the commoditization of learning. Anthropology Today 20(6): 5–9.
Cooper, Paul. 2007. Knowing your ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty in UK Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education 13(1): 19-29.
Delanty, Gerard. 2003. Ideologies of the Knowledge Society and the Cultural Contradictions of Higher Education. Policy Futures in Education 1(1): 71-82.
Derek, Bok. 2005. Univerziteti na tržištu. Beograd: Clio.
Douglas, Jacqueline and Alex Douglas. 2006. Evaluating teaching quality. Quality in Higher Education 12(1): 3–13.
Evans, Lewis. 1997. The Quest for Quality in Universities. Agenda 4(4): 399-406.
Florian, Răzvan V. 2007. Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 72(1): 25-32.
Gačanović, Ivana. 2009. Antropološke perspektive o/u kulturi revizije. Antropologija 8: 82-97.
Griffith, A. and K. Rask. 2007. The Influence of the US News and World Report Collegiate Rankings on the Matriculation Decision of High-Ability Students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review 26(2): 244-55.
Hazelkorn, Ellena. 2009a. Impact of Global Rankings on Higher Education Research and the Production of Knowledge. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, Occasional Paper No. 15: 1-14. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Dostupno na: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/ 0018/001816/181653e.pdf
Hazelkorn, Ellena. 2009b. Rankings and the (re)Construction of Knowledge. Centre for Social and Educational Research. Dostupno na: http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article =1005&context=cseroth
Holmes, Richard. 2006. The THES University Rankings: Are They Really World Class?. Asian Journal of University Education 2(1): 1-14. Dostupno na: http://www.oocities.com/universities06/ajueart.pdf
Kornbrot, Diana Eugenie. 2007. Misleading ‘quality’ measures in Higher Education: problems from combining diverse indicators that include subjective ratings and academic performance and costs. Radical Statstics 94: 48-63.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2008. Odnos države prema humanističkim naukama u Srbiji početkom XX veka: Citatometrija kao pokušaj ubistva srpske antropologije. Etnoantropološki problemi 3(2): 27-43.
Kovačević, Ivan. 2009. O ćurkama, pilićima i citatnim indeksima. Antropologija 8: 9-31.
Liessmann, Konrad Paul. 2008. Teorija neobrazovanosti: Zablude društva znanja. Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk.
Milenković, Miloš. 2009. O brojanju i merenju (drugih) ljudi (za novac). Antropologija 8: 33-52.
Myers, Luke and Jonathan Robe. 2009. College rankings: History, Criticism and Reform. A Report from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, Washington, DC. Dostupno na: http://www.centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/College _Rankings _History.pdf
Roberts, Andy. 2002. A Principled Complementarity of Method: In Defence of Methodological Eclecticism and the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate. The Qualitative Report 7(3). Dostupno na: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-3/roberts.html
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 1999. Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 557-75.
Shore, Cris and Susan Wright. 2000. “Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture and higher education”. In M. Strathern (ed.) Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, 57– 89. London: Routledge.
Stella, Antony and David Woodhouse. 2006. Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. AUQA Occasional Publication: 1-26. Dostupno na: http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/ranking_of_higher_education_institutions_final.pdf
Strathern, Marylin. 2000. The Tyranny of Transparency. British Educational Research Journal 26(3): 309-321.
Webster, David S. 1992. „Reputational Rankings of Colleges, Universities and Individual Disciplines and Fields of Stduy, From Their Beginnings to the Present”. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 8, ed. J. C. Smart, 234-304. New York: Agathon Press.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
World Cat
AnthroSerbia
